Cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Cumulative co2 land use was 1.53 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.53 billion
Change on year
up 1.9%
World rank
76th
of 197 countries
All-time high
1.53 billion
in 2024
All-time low
-2.74 million
in 1857
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso is 1.53 billion, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.9% on the previous year and up 23.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso peaked at 1.53 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, -2.74 million, in 1857.
Burkina Faso ranks 76th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | -899,256 | — |
| 1851 | -1.55 million | +71.9% |
| 1852 | -2.01 million | +29.9% |
| 1853 | -2.33 million | +16.1% |
| 1854 | -2.55 million | +9.3% |
| 1855 | -2.68 million | +5.1% |
| 1856 | -2.74 million | +2.3% |
| 1857 | -2.74 million | +0.1% |
| 1858 | -2.70 million | -1.7% |
| 1859 | -2.61 million | -3.2% |
| 1860 | -2.54 million | -2.9% |
| 1861 | -2.48 million | -2.4% |
| 1862 | -2.42 million | -2.1% |
| 1863 | -2.37 million | -2.1% |
| 1864 | -2.32 million | -2.3% |
| 1865 | -2.26 million | -2.5% |
| 1866 | -2.20 million | -2.8% |
| 1867 | -2.13 million | -3.1% |
| 1868 | -2.05 million | -3.5% |
| 1869 | -1.97 million | -3.9% |
| 1870 | -1.77 million | -10.2% |
| 1871 | -1.46 million | -17.5% |
| 1872 | -1.07 million | -26.6% |
| 1873 | -623,576 | -41.9% |
| 1874 | -127,068 | -79.6% |
| 1875 | 407,327 | -420.6% |
| 1876 | 974,221 | +139.2% |
| 1877 | 1.57 million | +60.9% |
| 1878 | 2.18 million | +39.3% |
| 1879 | 2.82 million | +29.0% |
| 1880 | 3.49 million | +23.9% |
| 1881 | 4.19 million | +20.0% |
| 1882 | 4.90 million | +17.0% |
| 1883 | 5.63 million | +14.8% |
| 1884 | 6.36 million | +13.1% |
| 1885 | 7.11 million | +11.7% |
| 1886 | 7.86 million | +10.6% |
| 1887 | 8.62 million | +9.6% |
| 1888 | 9.38 million | +8.8% |
| 1889 | 10.15 million | +8.2% |
| 1890 | 11.03 million | +8.7% |
| 1891 | 11.97 million | +8.5% |
| 1892 | 12.96 million | +8.2% |
| 1893 | 13.97 million | +7.8% |
| 1894 | 15.01 million | +7.4% |
| 1895 | 16.07 million | +7.0% |
| 1896 | 17.14 million | +6.7% |
| 1897 | 18.22 million | +6.3% |
| 1898 | 19.31 million | +6.0% |
| 1899 | 20.41 million | +5.7% |
| 1900 | 22.01 million | +7.8% |
| 1901 | 23.99 million | +9.0% |
| 1902 | 26.25 million | +9.4% |
| 1903 | 28.70 million | +9.3% |
| 1904 | 31.29 million | +9.1% |
| 1905 | 34.01 million | +8.7% |
| 1906 | 36.81 million | +8.2% |
| 1907 | 39.68 million | +7.8% |
| 1908 | 42.62 million | +7.4% |
| 1909 | 45.61 million | +7.0% |
| 1910 | 48.60 million | +6.5% |
| 1911 | 51.57 million | +6.1% |
| 1912 | 54.54 million | +5.8% |
| 1913 | 57.52 million | +5.5% |
| 1914 | 60.51 million | +5.2% |
| 1915 | 63.49 million | +4.9% |
| 1916 | 66.48 million | +4.7% |
| 1917 | 69.47 million | +4.5% |
| 1918 | 72.45 million | +4.3% |
| 1919 | 75.43 million | +4.1% |
| 1920 | 78.77 million | +4.4% |
| 1921 | 82.43 million | +4.6% |
| 1922 | 86.37 million | +4.8% |
| 1923 | 90.55 million | +4.8% |
| 1924 | 94.93 million | +4.8% |
| 1925 | 99.50 million | +4.8% |
| 1926 | 104.25 million | +4.8% |
| 1927 | 109.17 million | +4.7% |
| 1928 | 114.23 million | +4.6% |
| 1929 | 119.41 million | +4.5% |
| 1930 | 124.97 million | +4.7% |
| 1931 | 130.76 million | +4.6% |
| 1932 | 136.73 million | +4.6% |
| 1933 | 142.84 million | +4.5% |
| 1934 | 149.06 million | +4.4% |
| 1935 | 155.40 million | +4.3% |
| 1936 | 161.85 million | +4.1% |
| 1937 | 168.38 million | +4.0% |
| 1938 | 174.97 million | +3.9% |
| 1939 | 181.64 million | +3.8% |
| 1940 | 189.19 million | +4.2% |
| 1941 | 197.36 million | +4.3% |
| 1942 | 205.90 million | +4.3% |
| 1943 | 214.75 million | +4.3% |
| 1944 | 223.86 million | +4.2% |
| 1945 | 233.21 million | +4.2% |
| 1946 | 242.75 million | +4.1% |
| 1947 | 252.46 million | +4.0% |
| 1948 | 262.26 million | +3.9% |
| 1949 | 272.20 million | +3.8% |
| 1950 | 281.75 million | +3.5% |
| 1951 | 290.80 million | +3.2% |
| 1952 | 299.71 million | +3.1% |
| 1953 | 308.69 million | +3.0% |
| 1954 | 317.89 million | +3.0% |
| 1955 | 327.46 million | +3.0% |
| 1956 | 337.29 million | +3.0% |
| 1957 | 347.31 million | +3.0% |
| 1958 | 357.88 million | +3.0% |
| 1959 | 368.40 million | +2.9% |
| 1960 | 376.71 million | +2.3% |
| 1961 | 384.07 million | +2.0% |
| 1962 | 390.20 million | +1.6% |
| 1963 | 396.05 million | +1.5% |
| 1964 | 401.11 million | +1.3% |
| 1965 | 405.60 million | +1.1% |
| 1966 | 409.66 million | +1.0% |
| 1967 | 413.73 million | +1.0% |
| 1968 | 417.57 million | +0.9% |
| 1969 | 420.89 million | +0.8% |
| 1970 | 424.03 million | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 426.78 million | +0.6% |
| 1972 | 429.77 million | +0.7% |
| 1973 | 432.40 million | +0.6% |
| 1974 | 435.48 million | +0.7% |
| 1975 | 438.54 million | +0.7% |
| 1976 | 441.24 million | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 443.68 million | +0.6% |
| 1978 | 446.18 million | +0.6% |
| 1979 | 448.58 million | +0.5% |
| 1980 | 451.16 million | +0.6% |
| 1981 | 453.75 million | +0.6% |
| 1982 | 456.30 million | +0.6% |
| 1983 | 466.52 million | +2.2% |
| 1984 | 480.56 million | +3.0% |
| 1985 | 497.21 million | +3.5% |
| 1986 | 515.44 million | +3.7% |
| 1987 | 535.24 million | +3.8% |
| 1988 | 555.55 million | +3.8% |
| 1989 | 577.35 million | +3.9% |
| 1990 | 599.75 million | +3.9% |
| 1991 | 622.65 million | +3.8% |
| 1992 | 646.50 million | +3.8% |
| 1993 | 670.59 million | +3.7% |
| 1994 | 695.12 million | +3.7% |
| 1995 | 720.47 million | +3.6% |
| 1996 | 745.14 million | +3.4% |
| 1997 | 769.04 million | +3.2% |
| 1998 | 792.37 million | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 813.95 million | +2.7% |
| 2000 | 834.73 million | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 856.22 million | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 877.03 million | +2.4% |
| 2003 | 898.78 million | +2.5% |
| 2004 | 921.61 million | +2.5% |
| 2005 | 947.71 million | +2.8% |
| 2006 | 986.68 million | +4.1% |
| 2007 | 1.02 billion | +3.1% |
| 2008 | 1.05 billion | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 1.08 billion | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 1.11 billion | +3.1% |
| 2011 | 1.14 billion | +2.9% |
| 2012 | 1.17 billion | +2.9% |
| 2013 | 1.21 billion | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 1.24 billion | +2.7% |
| 2015 | 1.27 billion | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 1.30 billion | +2.3% |
| 2017 | 1.33 billion | +2.5% |
| 2018 | 1.36 billion | +2.3% |
| 2019 | 1.39 billion | +2.1% |
| 2020 | 1.42 billion | +2.0% |
| 2021 | 1.44 billion | +2.0% |
| 2022 | 1.47 billion | +1.9% |
| 2023 | 1.50 billion | +1.9% |
| 2024 | 1.53 billion | +1.9% |
Burkina Faso compared with similar countries
- Burkina Faso's 1.53 billion is above the median for low income countries, which is 1.53 billion, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Burkina Faso's 1.53 billion is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 98% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1875 | +420.6% | -127,068 | 407,327 |
| 1876 | +139.2% | 407,327 | 974,221 |
| 1874 | +79.6% | -623,576 | -127,068 |
| 1851 | -71.9% | -899,256 | -1.55 million |
| 1877 | +60.9% | 974,221 | 1.57 million |
| 1873 | +41.9% | -1.07 million | -623,576 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | -2.28 million | -2.74 million | -899,256 | 10 |
| 1860s | -2.27 million | -2.54 million | -1.97 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 289,195 | -1.77 million | 2.82 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 6.77 million | 3.49 million | 10.15 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 15.61 million | 11.03 million | 20.41 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 33.10 million | 22.01 million | 45.61 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 62.01 million | 48.60 million | 75.43 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 97.96 million | 78.77 million | 119.41 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 152.66 million | 124.97 million | 181.64 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 229.39 million | 189.19 million | 272.20 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 323.72 million | 281.75 million | 368.40 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 401.56 million | 376.71 million | 420.89 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 436.67 million | 424.03 million | 448.58 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 498.91 million | 451.16 million | 577.35 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 707.56 million | 599.75 million | 813.95 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 946.31 million | 834.73 million | 1.08 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.25 billion | 1.11 billion | 1.39 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.47 billion | 1.42 billion | 1.53 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Burkina Faso
More climate change data for Burkina Faso
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 118.69 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 29,986 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 10,729 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 19,257 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 40.49 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 687.74 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,646 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,267 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,379 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.78 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Burkina Faso was 1.53 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The highest recorded value was 1.53 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.74 million in 1857.
- How does Burkina Faso rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Burkina Faso ranks 76th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).