Cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Cumulative co2 land use was 1.63 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.63 billion
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
74th
of 197 countries
All-time high
1.63 billion
in 2024
All-time low
528,898
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic stood at 1.63 billion. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic peaked at 1.63 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 528,898, in 1850.
Dominican Republic ranks 74th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 528,898 | — |
| 1851 | 1.08 million | +104.1% |
| 1852 | 1.63 million | +50.9% |
| 1853 | 2.19 million | +34.6% |
| 1854 | 2.76 million | +26.0% |
| 1855 | 3.34 million | +20.9% |
| 1856 | 3.92 million | +17.4% |
| 1857 | 4.50 million | +14.9% |
| 1858 | 5.11 million | +13.4% |
| 1859 | 5.70 million | +11.6% |
| 1860 | 7.26 million | +27.3% |
| 1861 | 9.18 million | +26.5% |
| 1862 | 11.32 million | +23.3% |
| 1863 | 13.60 million | +20.1% |
| 1864 | 15.96 million | +17.4% |
| 1865 | 18.41 million | +15.3% |
| 1866 | 20.94 million | +13.8% |
| 1867 | 23.47 million | +12.1% |
| 1868 | 26.03 million | +10.9% |
| 1869 | 28.64 million | +10.0% |
| 1870 | 31.62 million | +10.4% |
| 1871 | 34.74 million | +9.9% |
| 1872 | 37.96 million | +9.3% |
| 1873 | 41.24 million | +8.6% |
| 1874 | 44.56 million | +8.1% |
| 1875 | 47.95 million | +7.6% |
| 1876 | 51.35 million | +7.1% |
| 1877 | 54.78 million | +6.7% |
| 1878 | 58.25 million | +6.3% |
| 1879 | 61.72 million | +6.0% |
| 1880 | 65.85 million | +6.7% |
| 1881 | 70.28 million | +6.7% |
| 1882 | 74.85 million | +6.5% |
| 1883 | 79.53 million | +6.2% |
| 1884 | 84.26 million | +6.0% |
| 1885 | 89.07 million | +5.7% |
| 1886 | 93.90 million | +5.4% |
| 1887 | 98.82 million | +5.2% |
| 1888 | 103.73 million | +5.0% |
| 1889 | 108.71 million | +4.8% |
| 1890 | 114.22 million | +5.1% |
| 1891 | 120.01 million | +5.1% |
| 1892 | 125.88 million | +4.9% |
| 1893 | 131.81 million | +4.7% |
| 1894 | 137.81 million | +4.6% |
| 1895 | 143.92 million | +4.4% |
| 1896 | 150.04 million | +4.2% |
| 1897 | 156.19 million | +4.1% |
| 1898 | 162.34 million | +3.9% |
| 1899 | 168.60 million | +3.9% |
| 1900 | 175.15 million | +3.9% |
| 1901 | 181.80 million | +3.8% |
| 1902 | 188.51 million | +3.7% |
| 1903 | 195.33 million | +3.6% |
| 1904 | 202.18 million | +3.5% |
| 1905 | 209.04 million | +3.4% |
| 1906 | 215.93 million | +3.3% |
| 1907 | 222.83 million | +3.2% |
| 1908 | 229.82 million | +3.1% |
| 1909 | 236.81 million | +3.0% |
| 1910 | 245.35 million | +3.6% |
| 1911 | 254.48 million | +3.7% |
| 1912 | 264.04 million | +3.8% |
| 1913 | 273.75 million | +3.7% |
| 1914 | 283.63 million | +3.6% |
| 1915 | 293.64 million | +3.5% |
| 1916 | 303.83 million | +3.5% |
| 1917 | 314.08 million | +3.4% |
| 1918 | 324.37 million | +3.3% |
| 1919 | 334.73 million | +3.2% |
| 1920 | 346.88 million | +3.6% |
| 1921 | 359.77 million | +3.7% |
| 1922 | 373.07 million | +3.7% |
| 1923 | 386.68 million | +3.6% |
| 1924 | 400.47 million | +3.6% |
| 1925 | 414.42 million | +3.5% |
| 1926 | 428.51 million | +3.4% |
| 1927 | 442.54 million | +3.3% |
| 1928 | 456.80 million | +3.2% |
| 1929 | 471.15 million | +3.1% |
| 1930 | 484.09 million | +2.7% |
| 1931 | 496.52 million | +2.6% |
| 1932 | 508.89 million | +2.5% |
| 1933 | 521.00 million | +2.4% |
| 1934 | 532.96 million | +2.3% |
| 1935 | 544.79 million | +2.2% |
| 1936 | 556.55 million | +2.2% |
| 1937 | 568.27 million | +2.1% |
| 1938 | 580.19 million | +2.1% |
| 1939 | 591.92 million | +2.0% |
| 1940 | 608.69 million | +2.8% |
| 1941 | 627.35 million | +3.1% |
| 1942 | 647.03 million | +3.1% |
| 1943 | 667.63 million | +3.2% |
| 1944 | 688.49 million | +3.1% |
| 1945 | 709.62 million | +3.1% |
| 1946 | 731.26 million | +3.1% |
| 1947 | 752.91 million | +3.0% |
| 1948 | 774.68 million | +2.9% |
| 1949 | 796.55 million | +2.8% |
| 1950 | 815.54 million | +2.4% |
| 1951 | 834.55 million | +2.3% |
| 1952 | 853.80 million | +2.3% |
| 1953 | 873.48 million | +2.3% |
| 1954 | 893.57 million | +2.3% |
| 1955 | 914.34 million | +2.3% |
| 1956 | 936.21 million | +2.4% |
| 1957 | 958.76 million | +2.4% |
| 1958 | 982.10 million | +2.4% |
| 1959 | 1.08 billion | +9.9% |
| 1960 | 1.12 billion | +3.8% |
| 1961 | 1.15 billion | +2.6% |
| 1962 | 1.17 billion | +2.0% |
| 1963 | 1.19 billion | +1.7% |
| 1964 | 1.21 billion | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 1.23 billion | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 1.24 billion | +1.3% |
| 1967 | 1.26 billion | +1.0% |
| 1968 | 1.28 billion | +1.7% |
| 1969 | 1.29 billion | +1.1% |
| 1970 | 1.30 billion | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 1.32 billion | +1.2% |
| 1972 | 1.34 billion | +1.5% |
| 1973 | 1.36 billion | +1.3% |
| 1974 | 1.38 billion | +1.4% |
| 1975 | 1.40 billion | +2.1% |
| 1976 | 1.43 billion | +1.7% |
| 1977 | 1.45 billion | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 1.47 billion | +1.4% |
| 1979 | 1.49 billion | +1.4% |
| 1980 | 1.50 billion | +0.9% |
| 1981 | 1.51 billion | +0.7% |
| 1982 | 1.52 billion | +0.5% |
| 1983 | 1.53 billion | +0.4% |
| 1984 | 1.53 billion | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 1.54 billion | +0.4% |
| 1986 | 1.54 billion | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 1.55 billion | +0.2% |
| 1988 | 1.55 billion | +0.3% |
| 1989 | 1.55 billion | -0.1% |
| 1990 | 1.55 billion | -0.0% |
| 1991 | 1.55 billion | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.55 billion | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.55 billion | +0.1% |
| 1994 | 1.56 billion | +0.6% |
| 1995 | 1.57 billion | +0.4% |
| 1996 | 1.57 billion | -0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.57 billion | +0.2% |
| 1998 | 1.57 billion | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.58 billion | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 1.59 billion | +0.4% |
| 2001 | 1.60 billion | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 1.59 billion | -0.1% |
| 2003 | 1.59 billion | -0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.59 billion | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.59 billion | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.59 billion | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.59 billion | -0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.60 billion | +0.1% |
| 2009 | 1.60 billion | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 1.60 billion | +0.1% |
| 2011 | 1.59 billion | -0.2% |
| 2012 | 1.59 billion | -0.1% |
| 2013 | 1.59 billion | -0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.61 billion | +1.2% |
| 2015 | 1.62 billion | +0.4% |
| 2016 | 1.62 billion | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 1.63 billion | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 1.63 billion | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 1.63 billion | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.63 billion | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.63 billion | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.63 billion | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.63 billion | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.63 billion | +0.0% |
Dominican Republic compared with similar countries
- Dominican Republic's 1.63 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 2.6× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Dominican Republic's 1.63 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 1.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +104.1% | 528,898 | 1.08 million |
| 1852 | +50.9% | 1.08 million | 1.63 million |
| 1853 | +34.6% | 1.63 million | 2.19 million |
| 1860 | +27.3% | 5.70 million | 7.26 million |
| 1861 | +26.5% | 7.26 million | 9.18 million |
| 1854 | +26.0% | 2.19 million | 2.76 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 3.08 million | 528,898 | 5.70 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 17.48 million | 7.26 million | 28.64 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 46.42 million | 31.62 million | 61.72 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 86.90 million | 65.85 million | 108.71 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 141.08 million | 114.22 million | 168.60 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 205.74 million | 175.15 million | 236.81 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 289.19 million | 245.35 million | 334.73 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 408.03 million | 346.88 million | 471.15 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 538.52 million | 484.09 million | 591.92 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 700.42 million | 608.69 million | 796.55 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 914.14 million | 815.54 million | 1.08 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.21 billion | 1.12 billion | 1.29 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.39 billion | 1.30 billion | 1.49 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.53 billion | 1.50 billion | 1.55 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.56 billion | 1.55 billion | 1.58 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.59 billion | 1.59 billion | 1.60 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.61 billion | 1.59 billion | 1.63 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.63 billion | 1.63 billion | 1.63 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
More climate change data for Dominican Republic
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 99.83 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 9,621 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,024 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.41 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 235.59 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,495 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 642.17 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,853 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 2.42 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Dominican Republic was 1.63 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 1.63 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 528,898 in 1850.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Dominican Republic ranks 74th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).