Cumulative co2 land use in Estonia
Estonia: Cumulative co2 land use was 216.48 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
216.48 million
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
132nd
of 197 countries
All-time high
483.67 million
in 1942
All-time low
14.18 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Estonia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Estonia is 216.48 million, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and down 4.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Estonia peaked at 483.67 million in 1942 and was at its lowest, 14.18 million, in 1850.
Estonia ranks 132nd of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 175 years of available data.
Cumulative co2 land use in Estonia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 14.18 million | — |
| 1851 | 28.27 million | +99.4% |
| 1852 | 42.27 million | +49.5% |
| 1853 | 56.27 million | +33.1% |
| 1854 | 70.56 million | +25.4% |
| 1855 | 84.78 million | +20.1% |
| 1856 | 99.02 million | +16.8% |
| 1857 | 113.33 million | +14.5% |
| 1858 | 127.73 million | +12.7% |
| 1859 | 142.31 million | +11.4% |
| 1860 | 154.14 million | +8.3% |
| 1861 | 164.98 million | +7.0% |
| 1862 | 175.40 million | +6.3% |
| 1863 | 185.42 million | +5.7% |
| 1864 | 194.91 million | +5.1% |
| 1865 | 204.00 million | +4.7% |
| 1866 | 212.77 million | +4.3% |
| 1867 | 221.37 million | +4.0% |
| 1868 | 229.53 million | +3.7% |
| 1869 | 237.46 million | +3.5% |
| 1870 | 245.24 million | +3.3% |
| 1871 | 252.62 million | +3.0% |
| 1872 | 259.68 million | +2.8% |
| 1873 | 266.49 million | +2.6% |
| 1874 | 273.19 million | +2.5% |
| 1875 | 279.64 million | +2.4% |
| 1876 | 285.95 million | +2.3% |
| 1877 | 292.12 million | +2.2% |
| 1878 | 298.19 million | +2.1% |
| 1879 | 304.21 million | +2.0% |
| 1880 | 309.93 million | +1.9% |
| 1881 | 315.39 million | +1.8% |
| 1882 | 320.82 million | +1.7% |
| 1883 | 326.20 million | +1.7% |
| 1884 | 331.39 million | +1.6% |
| 1885 | 336.41 million | +1.5% |
| 1886 | 341.34 million | +1.5% |
| 1887 | 346.17 million | +1.4% |
| 1888 | 350.85 million | +1.4% |
| 1889 | 355.40 million | +1.3% |
| 1890 | 359.94 million | +1.3% |
| 1891 | 364.29 million | +1.2% |
| 1892 | 368.43 million | +1.1% |
| 1893 | 372.38 million | +1.1% |
| 1894 | 376.24 million | +1.0% |
| 1895 | 380.06 million | +1.0% |
| 1896 | 383.79 million | +1.0% |
| 1897 | 387.44 million | +1.0% |
| 1898 | 391.15 million | +1.0% |
| 1899 | 394.74 million | +0.9% |
| 1900 | 398.17 million | +0.9% |
| 1901 | 401.65 million | +0.9% |
| 1902 | 404.94 million | +0.8% |
| 1903 | 408.24 million | +0.8% |
| 1904 | 411.40 million | +0.8% |
| 1905 | 414.57 million | +0.8% |
| 1906 | 417.61 million | +0.7% |
| 1907 | 420.61 million | +0.7% |
| 1908 | 423.52 million | +0.7% |
| 1909 | 426.40 million | +0.7% |
| 1910 | 429.10 million | +0.6% |
| 1911 | 431.71 million | +0.6% |
| 1912 | 434.26 million | +0.6% |
| 1913 | 436.86 million | +0.6% |
| 1914 | 439.32 million | +0.6% |
| 1915 | 441.78 million | +0.6% |
| 1916 | 444.14 million | +0.5% |
| 1917 | 446.50 million | +0.5% |
| 1918 | 448.82 million | +0.5% |
| 1919 | 451.02 million | +0.5% |
| 1920 | 453.24 million | +0.5% |
| 1921 | 455.36 million | +0.5% |
| 1922 | 457.42 million | +0.5% |
| 1923 | 459.43 million | +0.4% |
| 1924 | 461.43 million | +0.4% |
| 1925 | 463.36 million | +0.4% |
| 1926 | 465.21 million | +0.4% |
| 1927 | 466.92 million | +0.4% |
| 1928 | 468.61 million | +0.4% |
| 1929 | 470.30 million | +0.4% |
| 1930 | 471.88 million | +0.3% |
| 1931 | 473.43 million | +0.3% |
| 1932 | 474.88 million | +0.3% |
| 1933 | 476.21 million | +0.3% |
| 1934 | 477.46 million | +0.3% |
| 1935 | 478.57 million | +0.2% |
| 1936 | 479.69 million | +0.2% |
| 1937 | 480.63 million | +0.2% |
| 1938 | 481.60 million | +0.2% |
| 1939 | 482.47 million | +0.2% |
| 1940 | 483.05 million | +0.1% |
| 1941 | 483.46 million | +0.1% |
| 1942 | 483.67 million | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 483.62 million | -0.0% |
| 1944 | 483.41 million | -0.0% |
| 1945 | 483.06 million | -0.1% |
| 1946 | 482.49 million | -0.1% |
| 1947 | 481.75 million | -0.2% |
| 1948 | 480.78 million | -0.2% |
| 1949 | 479.72 million | -0.2% |
| 1950 | 478.63 million | -0.2% |
| 1951 | 477.69 million | -0.2% |
| 1952 | 476.60 million | -0.2% |
| 1953 | 475.12 million | -0.3% |
| 1954 | 473.26 million | -0.4% |
| 1955 | 471.13 million | -0.4% |
| 1956 | 468.32 million | -0.6% |
| 1957 | 464.67 million | -0.8% |
| 1958 | 459.76 million | -1.1% |
| 1959 | 450.92 million | -1.9% |
| 1960 | 442.45 million | -1.9% |
| 1961 | 434.60 million | -1.8% |
| 1962 | 426.73 million | -1.8% |
| 1963 | 419.19 million | -1.8% |
| 1964 | 411.99 million | -1.7% |
| 1965 | 404.91 million | -1.7% |
| 1966 | 398.13 million | -1.7% |
| 1967 | 391.74 million | -1.6% |
| 1968 | 385.81 million | -1.5% |
| 1969 | 380.06 million | -1.5% |
| 1970 | 374.64 million | -1.4% |
| 1971 | 369.49 million | -1.4% |
| 1972 | 364.58 million | -1.3% |
| 1973 | 360.22 million | -1.2% |
| 1974 | 355.88 million | -1.2% |
| 1975 | 351.88 million | -1.1% |
| 1976 | 348.14 million | -1.1% |
| 1977 | 344.53 million | -1.0% |
| 1978 | 340.95 million | -1.0% |
| 1979 | 337.75 million | -0.9% |
| 1980 | 334.80 million | -0.9% |
| 1981 | 332.00 million | -0.8% |
| 1982 | 329.45 million | -0.8% |
| 1983 | 326.96 million | -0.8% |
| 1984 | 324.69 million | -0.7% |
| 1985 | 322.58 million | -0.6% |
| 1986 | 320.63 million | -0.6% |
| 1987 | 318.63 million | -0.6% |
| 1988 | 316.67 million | -0.6% |
| 1989 | 314.83 million | -0.6% |
| 1990 | 313.12 million | -0.5% |
| 1991 | 311.67 million | -0.5% |
| 1992 | 309.43 million | -0.7% |
| 1993 | 304.03 million | -1.7% |
| 1994 | 297.21 million | -2.2% |
| 1995 | 291.79 million | -1.8% |
| 1996 | 286.86 million | -1.7% |
| 1997 | 283.63 million | -1.1% |
| 1998 | 279.23 million | -1.6% |
| 1999 | 276.30 million | -1.0% |
| 2000 | 269.25 million | -2.6% |
| 2001 | 260.00 million | -3.4% |
| 2002 | 257.07 million | -1.1% |
| 2003 | 249.77 million | -2.8% |
| 2004 | 250.10 million | +0.1% |
| 2005 | 246.95 million | -1.3% |
| 2006 | 243.91 million | -1.2% |
| 2007 | 239.70 million | -1.7% |
| 2008 | 236.84 million | -1.2% |
| 2009 | 235.31 million | -0.6% |
| 2010 | 232.54 million | -1.2% |
| 2011 | 229.88 million | -1.1% |
| 2012 | 227.82 million | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 226.07 million | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 225.48 million | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 225.08 million | -0.2% |
| 2016 | 223.45 million | -0.7% |
| 2017 | 222.07 million | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 220.98 million | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 219.62 million | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 218.64 million | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 217.69 million | -0.4% |
| 2022 | 217.07 million | -0.3% |
| 2023 | 216.69 million | -0.2% |
| 2024 | 216.48 million | -0.1% |
Estonia compared with similar countries
- Estonia's 216.48 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million, 67% of the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Estonia's 216.48 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 51% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Estonia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +99.4% | 14.18 million | 28.27 million |
| 1852 | +49.5% | 28.27 million | 42.27 million |
| 1853 | +33.1% | 42.27 million | 56.27 million |
| 1854 | +25.4% | 56.27 million | 70.56 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 77.87 million | 14.18 million | 142.31 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 198.00 million | 154.14 million | 237.46 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 275.73 million | 245.24 million | 304.21 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 333.39 million | 309.93 million | 355.40 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 377.85 million | 359.94 million | 394.74 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 412.71 million | 398.17 million | 426.40 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 440.35 million | 429.10 million | 451.02 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 462.13 million | 453.24 million | 470.30 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 477.68 million | 471.88 million | 482.47 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 482.50 million | 479.72 million | 483.67 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 469.61 million | 450.92 million | 478.63 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 409.56 million | 380.06 million | 442.45 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 354.80 million | 337.75 million | 374.64 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 324.12 million | 314.83 million | 334.80 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 295.33 million | 276.30 million | 313.12 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 248.89 million | 235.31 million | 269.25 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 225.30 million | 219.62 million | 232.54 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 217.31 million | 216.48 million | 218.64 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Estonia
More climate change data for Estonia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 22.20 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 871.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 170.85 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 700.96 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.6447 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 178.32 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 175.54 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.79 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.6624 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Estonia?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Estonia was 216.48 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Estonia?
- The highest recorded value was 483.67 million in 1942.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Estonia?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.18 million in 1850.
- How does Estonia rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Estonia ranks 132nd out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Estonia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Estonia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).