Cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho
Lesotho: Cumulative co2 land use was 233.61 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho stood at 233.61 million. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
The figure is up 3.0% on the previous year and up 47.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho peaked at 233.61 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 94,238, in 1850.
That places Lesotho 130th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 94,238 | — |
| 1851 | 200,457 | +112.7% |
| 1852 | 315,617 | +57.4% |
| 1853 | 437,775 | +38.7% |
| 1854 | 565,612 | +29.2% |
| 1855 | 698,248 | +23.4% |
| 1856 | 834,989 | +19.6% |
| 1857 | 975,320 | +16.8% |
| 1858 | 1.12 million | +14.7% |
| 1859 | 1.27 million | +13.1% |
| 1860 | 1.42 million | +12.0% |
| 1861 | 1.57 million | +11.1% |
| 1862 | 1.74 million | +10.2% |
| 1863 | 1.90 million | +9.5% |
| 1864 | 2.07 million | +8.8% |
| 1865 | 2.24 million | +8.2% |
| 1866 | 2.41 million | +7.7% |
| 1867 | 2.59 million | +7.2% |
| 1868 | 2.76 million | +6.8% |
| 1869 | 2.94 million | +6.5% |
| 1870 | 3.13 million | +6.5% |
| 1871 | 3.33 million | +6.5% |
| 1872 | 3.55 million | +6.3% |
| 1873 | 3.76 million | +6.1% |
| 1874 | 3.99 million | +5.9% |
| 1875 | 4.22 million | +5.7% |
| 1876 | 4.45 million | +5.5% |
| 1877 | 4.68 million | +5.3% |
| 1878 | 4.92 million | +5.1% |
| 1879 | 5.17 million | +4.9% |
| 1880 | 5.40 million | +4.6% |
| 1881 | 5.64 million | +4.4% |
| 1882 | 5.88 million | +4.2% |
| 1883 | 6.12 million | +4.1% |
| 1884 | 6.36 million | +3.9% |
| 1885 | 6.60 million | +3.8% |
| 1886 | 6.84 million | +3.6% |
| 1887 | 7.08 million | +3.5% |
| 1888 | 7.32 million | +3.4% |
| 1889 | 7.56 million | +3.3% |
| 1890 | 7.80 million | +3.3% |
| 1891 | 8.06 million | +3.3% |
| 1892 | 8.32 million | +3.3% |
| 1893 | 8.59 million | +3.2% |
| 1894 | 8.86 million | +3.2% |
| 1895 | 9.14 million | +3.1% |
| 1896 | 9.42 million | +3.1% |
| 1897 | 9.70 million | +3.0% |
| 1898 | 9.98 million | +2.9% |
| 1899 | 10.27 million | +2.9% |
| 1900 | 10.59 million | +3.1% |
| 1901 | 10.94 million | +3.3% |
| 1902 | 11.32 million | +3.4% |
| 1903 | 11.71 million | +3.5% |
| 1904 | 12.12 million | +3.5% |
| 1905 | 12.54 million | +3.5% |
| 1906 | 12.98 million | +3.5% |
| 1907 | 13.42 million | +3.4% |
| 1908 | 13.87 million | +3.4% |
| 1909 | 14.33 million | +3.3% |
| 1910 | 14.80 million | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 15.29 million | +3.3% |
| 1912 | 15.79 million | +3.3% |
| 1913 | 16.30 million | +3.2% |
| 1914 | 16.81 million | +3.2% |
| 1915 | 17.34 million | +3.1% |
| 1916 | 17.87 million | +3.1% |
| 1917 | 18.40 million | +3.0% |
| 1918 | 18.94 million | +2.9% |
| 1919 | 19.49 million | +2.9% |
| 1920 | 20.09 million | +3.1% |
| 1921 | 20.75 million | +3.2% |
| 1922 | 21.43 million | +3.3% |
| 1923 | 22.15 million | +3.3% |
| 1924 | 22.89 million | +3.4% |
| 1925 | 23.66 million | +3.3% |
| 1926 | 24.44 million | +3.3% |
| 1927 | 25.24 million | +3.3% |
| 1928 | 26.05 million | +3.2% |
| 1929 | 26.87 million | +3.2% |
| 1930 | 27.99 million | +4.2% |
| 1931 | 29.34 million | +4.8% |
| 1932 | 30.87 million | +5.2% |
| 1933 | 32.54 million | +5.4% |
| 1934 | 34.33 million | +5.5% |
| 1935 | 36.23 million | +5.5% |
| 1936 | 38.21 million | +5.5% |
| 1937 | 40.27 million | +5.4% |
| 1938 | 42.39 million | +5.3% |
| 1939 | 44.58 million | +5.2% |
| 1940 | 46.46 million | +4.2% |
| 1941 | 48.13 million | +3.6% |
| 1942 | 49.63 million | +3.1% |
| 1943 | 51.02 million | +2.8% |
| 1944 | 52.30 million | +2.5% |
| 1945 | 53.49 million | +2.3% |
| 1946 | 54.62 million | +2.1% |
| 1947 | 55.69 million | +2.0% |
| 1948 | 56.70 million | +1.8% |
| 1949 | 57.67 million | +1.7% |
| 1950 | 58.69 million | +1.8% |
| 1951 | 59.75 million | +1.8% |
| 1952 | 60.88 million | +1.9% |
| 1953 | 62.06 million | +1.9% |
| 1954 | 63.23 million | +1.9% |
| 1955 | 64.49 million | +2.0% |
| 1956 | 65.77 million | +2.0% |
| 1957 | 67.08 million | +2.0% |
| 1958 | 68.44 million | +2.0% |
| 1959 | 69.82 million | +2.0% |
| 1960 | 71.10 million | +1.8% |
| 1961 | 72.25 million | +1.6% |
| 1962 | 73.36 million | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 74.53 million | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 75.66 million | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 77.01 million | +1.8% |
| 1966 | 78.50 million | +1.9% |
| 1967 | 80.29 million | +2.3% |
| 1968 | 82.04 million | +2.2% |
| 1969 | 83.94 million | +2.3% |
| 1970 | 85.63 million | +2.0% |
| 1971 | 87.20 million | +1.8% |
| 1972 | 88.78 million | +1.8% |
| 1973 | 90.32 million | +1.7% |
| 1974 | 92.55 million | +2.5% |
| 1975 | 94.18 million | +1.8% |
| 1976 | 94.55 million | +0.4% |
| 1977 | 94.97 million | +0.4% |
| 1978 | 96.09 million | +1.2% |
| 1979 | 96.76 million | +0.7% |
| 1980 | 97.66 million | +0.9% |
| 1981 | 98.31 million | +0.7% |
| 1982 | 98.86 million | +0.6% |
| 1983 | 100.03 million | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 101.27 million | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 102.10 million | +0.8% |
| 1986 | 104.44 million | +2.3% |
| 1987 | 106.70 million | +2.2% |
| 1988 | 107.96 million | +1.2% |
| 1989 | 109.78 million | +1.7% |
| 1990 | 111.22 million | +1.3% |
| 1991 | 113.11 million | +1.7% |
| 1992 | 114.66 million | +1.4% |
| 1993 | 115.87 million | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 116.94 million | +0.9% |
| 1995 | 118.03 million | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 119.26 million | +1.0% |
| 1997 | 120.38 million | +0.9% |
| 1998 | 121.26 million | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 122.34 million | +0.9% |
| 2000 | 123.27 million | +0.8% |
| 2001 | 123.32 million | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 127.04 million | +3.0% |
| 2003 | 133.19 million | +4.8% |
| 2004 | 137.76 million | +3.4% |
| 2005 | 140.17 million | +1.7% |
| 2006 | 146.46 million | +4.5% |
| 2007 | 151.77 million | +3.6% |
| 2008 | 154.90 million | +2.1% |
| 2009 | 156.60 million | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 157.29 million | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 156.90 million | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 155.66 million | -0.8% |
| 2013 | 158.62 million | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 158.88 million | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 166.33 million | +4.7% |
| 2016 | 175.88 million | +5.7% |
| 2017 | 185.32 million | +5.4% |
| 2018 | 191.31 million | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 198.24 million | +3.6% |
| 2020 | 205.46 million | +3.6% |
| 2021 | 212.70 million | +3.5% |
| 2022 | 219.89 million | +3.4% |
| 2023 | 226.89 million | +3.2% |
| 2024 | 233.61 million | +3.0% |
Lesotho compared with similar countries
- Lesotho's 233.61 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 12% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Lesotho's 233.61 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 15% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +112.7% | 94,238 | 200,457 |
| 1852 | +57.4% | 200,457 | 315,617 |
| 1853 | +38.7% | 315,617 | 437,775 |
| 1854 | +29.2% | 437,775 | 565,612 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 650,624 | 94,238 | 1.27 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 2.16 million | 1.42 million | 2.94 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 4.12 million | 3.13 million | 5.17 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 6.48 million | 5.40 million | 7.56 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 9.01 million | 7.80 million | 10.27 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 12.38 million | 10.59 million | 14.33 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 17.10 million | 14.80 million | 19.49 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 23.36 million | 20.09 million | 26.87 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 35.67 million | 27.99 million | 44.58 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 52.57 million | 46.46 million | 57.67 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 64.02 million | 58.69 million | 69.82 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 76.87 million | 71.10 million | 83.94 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 92.10 million | 85.63 million | 96.76 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 102.71 million | 97.66 million | 109.78 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 117.31 million | 111.22 million | 122.34 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 139.45 million | 123.27 million | 156.60 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 170.44 million | 155.66 million | 198.24 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 219.71 million | 205.46 million | 233.61 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Lesotho
More climate change data for Lesotho
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 6.55 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,116 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 715.74 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,401 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 50.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 61.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 51.99 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9.3 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.1962 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Lesotho was 233.61 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Lesotho?
- The highest recorded value was 233.61 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Lesotho?
- The lowest recorded value was 94,238 in 1850.
- How does Lesotho rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Lesotho ranks 130th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Lesotho?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lesotho data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).