Cumulative co2 land use in Hungary
Hungary: Cumulative co2 land use was 591.70 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
591.70 million
Change on year
down 1.8%
World rank
102nd
of 197 countries
All-time high
956.29 million
in 1953
All-time low
15.46 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Hungary, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Hungary stood at 591.70 million.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.8% on the previous year and down 12.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Hungary peaked at 956.29 million in 1953 and was at its lowest, 15.46 million, in 1850.
Hungary ranks 102nd of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 175 years of available data.
Cumulative co2 land use in Hungary, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 15.46 million | — |
| 1851 | 30.43 million | +96.8% |
| 1852 | 44.94 million | +47.7% |
| 1853 | 59.07 million | +31.4% |
| 1854 | 72.75 million | +23.2% |
| 1855 | 85.85 million | +18.0% |
| 1856 | 98.60 million | +14.8% |
| 1857 | 111.01 million | +12.6% |
| 1858 | 122.98 million | +10.8% |
| 1859 | 134.69 million | +9.5% |
| 1860 | 146.15 million | +8.5% |
| 1861 | 157.18 million | +7.5% |
| 1862 | 167.86 million | +6.8% |
| 1863 | 178.26 million | +6.2% |
| 1864 | 188.41 million | +5.7% |
| 1865 | 198.51 million | +5.4% |
| 1866 | 208.49 million | +5.0% |
| 1867 | 218.41 million | +4.8% |
| 1868 | 228.04 million | +4.4% |
| 1869 | 237.38 million | +4.1% |
| 1870 | 247.75 million | +4.4% |
| 1871 | 258.54 million | +4.4% |
| 1872 | 269.53 million | +4.3% |
| 1873 | 280.72 million | +4.2% |
| 1874 | 291.95 million | +4.0% |
| 1875 | 303.03 million | +3.8% |
| 1876 | 314.21 million | +3.7% |
| 1877 | 325.50 million | +3.6% |
| 1878 | 336.71 million | +3.4% |
| 1879 | 347.96 million | +3.3% |
| 1880 | 359.08 million | +3.2% |
| 1881 | 370.04 million | +3.1% |
| 1882 | 380.81 million | +2.9% |
| 1883 | 391.47 million | +2.8% |
| 1884 | 402.11 million | +2.7% |
| 1885 | 412.83 million | +2.7% |
| 1886 | 423.60 million | +2.6% |
| 1887 | 434.41 million | +2.6% |
| 1888 | 444.99 million | +2.4% |
| 1889 | 455.42 million | +2.3% |
| 1890 | 466.99 million | +2.5% |
| 1891 | 479.03 million | +2.6% |
| 1892 | 491.24 million | +2.5% |
| 1893 | 503.57 million | +2.5% |
| 1894 | 515.84 million | +2.4% |
| 1895 | 527.83 million | +2.3% |
| 1896 | 539.85 million | +2.3% |
| 1897 | 551.86 million | +2.2% |
| 1898 | 563.66 million | +2.1% |
| 1899 | 575.44 million | +2.1% |
| 1900 | 587.01 million | +2.0% |
| 1901 | 598.30 million | +1.9% |
| 1902 | 609.42 million | +1.9% |
| 1903 | 620.42 million | +1.8% |
| 1904 | 631.36 million | +1.8% |
| 1905 | 642.11 million | +1.7% |
| 1906 | 652.48 million | +1.6% |
| 1907 | 662.83 million | +1.6% |
| 1908 | 673.13 million | +1.6% |
| 1909 | 683.19 million | +1.5% |
| 1910 | 692.07 million | +1.3% |
| 1911 | 700.52 million | +1.2% |
| 1912 | 708.43 million | +1.1% |
| 1913 | 715.86 million | +1.0% |
| 1914 | 722.89 million | +1.0% |
| 1915 | 729.71 million | +0.9% |
| 1916 | 736.45 million | +0.9% |
| 1917 | 743.09 million | +0.9% |
| 1918 | 749.62 million | +0.9% |
| 1919 | 755.78 million | +0.8% |
| 1920 | 763.20 million | +1.0% |
| 1921 | 771.36 million | +1.1% |
| 1922 | 779.69 million | +1.1% |
| 1923 | 788.27 million | +1.1% |
| 1924 | 796.40 million | +1.0% |
| 1925 | 804.86 million | +1.1% |
| 1926 | 813.26 million | +1.0% |
| 1927 | 821.89 million | +1.1% |
| 1928 | 830.83 million | +1.1% |
| 1929 | 839.44 million | +1.0% |
| 1930 | 847.73 million | +1.0% |
| 1931 | 855.71 million | +0.9% |
| 1932 | 863.53 million | +0.9% |
| 1933 | 871.40 million | +0.9% |
| 1934 | 879.08 million | +0.9% |
| 1935 | 886.75 million | +0.9% |
| 1936 | 894.30 million | +0.9% |
| 1937 | 901.52 million | +0.8% |
| 1938 | 908.84 million | +0.8% |
| 1939 | 916.14 million | +0.8% |
| 1940 | 921.97 million | +0.6% |
| 1941 | 927.08 million | +0.6% |
| 1942 | 931.63 million | +0.5% |
| 1943 | 936.28 million | +0.5% |
| 1944 | 940.03 million | +0.4% |
| 1945 | 943.07 million | +0.3% |
| 1946 | 946.10 million | +0.3% |
| 1947 | 948.62 million | +0.3% |
| 1948 | 950.59 million | +0.2% |
| 1949 | 952.44 million | +0.2% |
| 1950 | 954.22 million | +0.2% |
| 1951 | 955.12 million | +0.1% |
| 1952 | 956.17 million | +0.1% |
| 1953 | 956.29 million | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 955.84 million | -0.0% |
| 1955 | 955.06 million | -0.1% |
| 1956 | 953.85 million | -0.1% |
| 1957 | 952.51 million | -0.1% |
| 1958 | 950.87 million | -0.2% |
| 1959 | 949.00 million | -0.2% |
| 1960 | 947.65 million | -0.1% |
| 1961 | 945.50 million | -0.2% |
| 1962 | 943.46 million | -0.2% |
| 1963 | 941.55 million | -0.2% |
| 1964 | 939.82 million | -0.2% |
| 1965 | 937.60 million | -0.2% |
| 1966 | 935.22 million | -0.3% |
| 1967 | 933.15 million | -0.2% |
| 1968 | 931.44 million | -0.2% |
| 1969 | 928.89 million | -0.3% |
| 1970 | 926.30 million | -0.3% |
| 1971 | 923.90 million | -0.3% |
| 1972 | 921.43 million | -0.3% |
| 1973 | 918.20 million | -0.4% |
| 1974 | 915.13 million | -0.3% |
| 1975 | 911.38 million | -0.4% |
| 1976 | 907.43 million | -0.4% |
| 1977 | 903.16 million | -0.5% |
| 1978 | 898.35 million | -0.5% |
| 1979 | 893.70 million | -0.5% |
| 1980 | 888.91 million | -0.5% |
| 1981 | 884.40 million | -0.5% |
| 1982 | 880.37 million | -0.5% |
| 1983 | 876.82 million | -0.4% |
| 1984 | 873.49 million | -0.4% |
| 1985 | 869.80 million | -0.4% |
| 1986 | 866.57 million | -0.4% |
| 1987 | 863.58 million | -0.3% |
| 1988 | 860.61 million | -0.3% |
| 1989 | 857.64 million | -0.3% |
| 1990 | 855.66 million | -0.2% |
| 1991 | 846.44 million | -1.1% |
| 1992 | 838.44 million | -0.9% |
| 1993 | 831.03 million | -0.9% |
| 1994 | 827.55 million | -0.4% |
| 1995 | 822.51 million | -0.6% |
| 1996 | 817.89 million | -0.6% |
| 1997 | 813.39 million | -0.6% |
| 1998 | 810.49 million | -0.4% |
| 1999 | 800.87 million | -1.2% |
| 2000 | 793.13 million | -1.0% |
| 2001 | 784.73 million | -1.1% |
| 2002 | 778.08 million | -0.8% |
| 2003 | 771.78 million | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 765.29 million | -0.8% |
| 2005 | 758.13 million | -0.9% |
| 2006 | 751.65 million | -0.9% |
| 2007 | 745.78 million | -0.8% |
| 2008 | 740.38 million | -0.7% |
| 2009 | 729.09 million | -1.5% |
| 2010 | 718.01 million | -1.5% |
| 2011 | 708.29 million | -1.4% |
| 2012 | 697.42 million | -1.5% |
| 2013 | 687.66 million | -1.4% |
| 2014 | 678.38 million | -1.3% |
| 2015 | 670.23 million | -1.2% |
| 2016 | 662.95 million | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 655.47 million | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 648.33 million | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 634.14 million | -2.2% |
| 2020 | 629.14 million | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 622.07 million | -1.1% |
| 2022 | 612.67 million | -1.5% |
| 2023 | 602.44 million | -1.7% |
| 2024 | 591.70 million | -1.8% |
Hungary compared with similar countries
- Hungary's 591.70 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million, 1.8× the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Hungary's 591.70 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 1.4× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Hungary changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +96.8% | 15.46 million | 30.43 million |
| 1852 | +47.7% | 30.43 million | 44.94 million |
| 1853 | +31.4% | 44.94 million | 59.07 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 77.58 million | 15.46 million | 134.69 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 192.87 million | 146.15 million | 237.38 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 297.59 million | 247.75 million | 347.96 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 407.48 million | 359.08 million | 455.42 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 521.53 million | 466.99 million | 575.44 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 636.02 million | 587.01 million | 683.19 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 725.44 million | 692.07 million | 755.78 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 800.92 million | 763.20 million | 839.44 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 882.50 million | 847.73 million | 916.14 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 939.78 million | 921.97 million | 952.44 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 953.89 million | 949.00 million | 956.29 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 938.43 million | 928.89 million | 947.65 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 911.90 million | 893.70 million | 926.30 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 872.22 million | 857.64 million | 888.91 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 826.43 million | 800.87 million | 855.66 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 761.80 million | 729.09 million | 793.13 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 676.09 million | 634.14 million | 718.01 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 611.60 million | 591.70 million | 629.14 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Hungary
More climate change data for Hungary
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 285.10 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,529 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 964.55 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,564 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.64 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 91.58 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,555 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,421 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 134.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 9.13 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Hungary?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Hungary was 591.70 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Hungary?
- The highest recorded value was 956.29 million in 1953.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Hungary?
- The lowest recorded value was 15.46 million in 1850.
- How does Hungary rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Hungary ranks 102nd out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Hungary?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Hungary data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).