Cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia
Tunisia: Cumulative co2 land use was 555.23 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
555.23 million
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
104th
of 197 countries
All-time high
557.05 million
in 2022
All-time low
666,811
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia is 555.23 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 0.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia peaked at 557.05 million in 2022 and was at its lowest, 666,811, in 1850.
Tunisia ranks 104th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 666,811 | — |
| 1851 | 1.58 million | +136.3% |
| 1852 | 2.63 million | +67.2% |
| 1853 | 3.79 million | +43.9% |
| 1854 | 5.02 million | +32.4% |
| 1855 | 6.30 million | +25.5% |
| 1856 | 7.62 million | +21.0% |
| 1857 | 8.98 million | +17.8% |
| 1858 | 10.37 million | +15.4% |
| 1859 | 11.78 million | +13.6% |
| 1860 | 13.26 million | +12.5% |
| 1861 | 14.77 million | +11.4% |
| 1862 | 16.31 million | +10.4% |
| 1863 | 17.88 million | +9.6% |
| 1864 | 19.46 million | +8.8% |
| 1865 | 21.06 million | +8.2% |
| 1866 | 22.67 million | +7.6% |
| 1867 | 24.29 million | +7.2% |
| 1868 | 25.92 million | +6.7% |
| 1869 | 27.57 million | +6.3% |
| 1870 | 29.28 million | +6.2% |
| 1871 | 31.04 million | +6.0% |
| 1872 | 32.82 million | +5.7% |
| 1873 | 34.62 million | +5.5% |
| 1874 | 36.43 million | +5.2% |
| 1875 | 38.26 million | +5.0% |
| 1876 | 40.09 million | +4.8% |
| 1877 | 41.93 million | +4.6% |
| 1878 | 43.78 million | +4.4% |
| 1879 | 45.63 million | +4.2% |
| 1880 | 47.59 million | +4.3% |
| 1881 | 49.60 million | +4.2% |
| 1882 | 51.64 million | +4.1% |
| 1883 | 53.70 million | +4.0% |
| 1884 | 55.78 million | +3.9% |
| 1885 | 57.88 million | +3.8% |
| 1886 | 59.98 million | +3.6% |
| 1887 | 62.09 million | +3.5% |
| 1888 | 64.20 million | +3.4% |
| 1889 | 66.33 million | +3.3% |
| 1890 | 68.47 million | +3.2% |
| 1891 | 70.63 million | +3.2% |
| 1892 | 72.80 million | +3.1% |
| 1893 | 74.98 million | +3.0% |
| 1894 | 77.17 million | +2.9% |
| 1895 | 79.36 million | +2.8% |
| 1896 | 81.55 million | +2.8% |
| 1897 | 83.75 million | +2.7% |
| 1898 | 85.95 million | +2.6% |
| 1899 | 88.15 million | +2.6% |
| 1900 | 91.07 million | +3.3% |
| 1901 | 94.38 million | +3.6% |
| 1902 | 97.91 million | +3.7% |
| 1903 | 101.59 million | +3.8% |
| 1904 | 105.37 million | +3.7% |
| 1905 | 109.23 million | +3.7% |
| 1906 | 113.15 million | +3.6% |
| 1907 | 117.11 million | +3.5% |
| 1908 | 121.12 million | +3.4% |
| 1909 | 125.16 million | +3.3% |
| 1910 | 128.25 million | +2.5% |
| 1911 | 130.85 million | +2.0% |
| 1912 | 133.16 million | +1.8% |
| 1913 | 135.29 million | +1.6% |
| 1914 | 137.30 million | +1.5% |
| 1915 | 139.22 million | +1.4% |
| 1916 | 141.06 million | +1.3% |
| 1917 | 142.86 million | +1.3% |
| 1918 | 144.61 million | +1.2% |
| 1919 | 146.32 million | +1.2% |
| 1920 | 148.69 million | +1.6% |
| 1921 | 151.42 million | +1.8% |
| 1922 | 154.36 million | +1.9% |
| 1923 | 157.45 million | +2.0% |
| 1924 | 160.65 million | +2.0% |
| 1925 | 163.93 million | +2.0% |
| 1926 | 167.29 million | +2.0% |
| 1927 | 170.71 million | +2.0% |
| 1928 | 174.19 million | +2.0% |
| 1929 | 177.71 million | +2.0% |
| 1930 | 182.36 million | +2.6% |
| 1931 | 187.61 million | +2.9% |
| 1932 | 193.24 million | +3.0% |
| 1933 | 199.11 million | +3.0% |
| 1934 | 205.17 million | +3.0% |
| 1935 | 211.37 million | +3.0% |
| 1936 | 217.68 million | +3.0% |
| 1937 | 224.09 million | +2.9% |
| 1938 | 230.58 million | +2.9% |
| 1939 | 237.15 million | +2.8% |
| 1940 | 243.69 million | +2.8% |
| 1941 | 250.24 million | +2.7% |
| 1942 | 256.80 million | +2.6% |
| 1943 | 263.39 million | +2.6% |
| 1944 | 270.00 million | +2.5% |
| 1945 | 276.63 million | +2.5% |
| 1946 | 283.29 million | +2.4% |
| 1947 | 289.96 million | +2.4% |
| 1948 | 296.67 million | +2.3% |
| 1949 | 303.39 million | +2.3% |
| 1950 | 311.95 million | +2.8% |
| 1951 | 321.00 million | +2.9% |
| 1952 | 329.84 million | +2.8% |
| 1953 | 338.22 million | +2.5% |
| 1954 | 346.16 million | +2.3% |
| 1955 | 353.63 million | +2.2% |
| 1956 | 360.80 million | +2.0% |
| 1957 | 367.90 million | +2.0% |
| 1958 | 375.07 million | +1.9% |
| 1959 | 382.49 million | +2.0% |
| 1960 | 387.81 million | +1.4% |
| 1961 | 391.73 million | +1.0% |
| 1962 | 394.86 million | +0.8% |
| 1963 | 401.18 million | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 405.37 million | +1.0% |
| 1965 | 408.52 million | +0.8% |
| 1966 | 411.10 million | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 413.24 million | +0.5% |
| 1968 | 421.82 million | +2.1% |
| 1969 | 435.19 million | +3.2% |
| 1970 | 443.28 million | +1.9% |
| 1971 | 453.08 million | +2.2% |
| 1972 | 463.11 million | +2.2% |
| 1973 | 471.54 million | +1.8% |
| 1974 | 480.20 million | +1.8% |
| 1975 | 488.90 million | +1.8% |
| 1976 | 496.47 million | +1.5% |
| 1977 | 499.68 million | +0.6% |
| 1978 | 500.85 million | +0.2% |
| 1979 | 498.11 million | -0.5% |
| 1980 | 498.44 million | +0.1% |
| 1981 | 501.45 million | +0.6% |
| 1982 | 506.75 million | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 510.36 million | +0.7% |
| 1984 | 511.45 million | +0.2% |
| 1985 | 510.41 million | -0.2% |
| 1986 | 509.90 million | -0.1% |
| 1987 | 508.70 million | -0.2% |
| 1988 | 509.68 million | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 509.42 million | -0.1% |
| 1990 | 510.00 million | +0.1% |
| 1991 | 510.14 million | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 511.73 million | +0.3% |
| 1993 | 510.71 million | -0.2% |
| 1994 | 513.01 million | +0.5% |
| 1995 | 515.50 million | +0.5% |
| 1996 | 516.60 million | +0.2% |
| 1997 | 519.19 million | +0.5% |
| 1998 | 522.66 million | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 523.24 million | +0.1% |
| 2000 | 522.39 million | -0.2% |
| 2001 | 521.87 million | -0.1% |
| 2002 | 522.42 million | +0.1% |
| 2003 | 522.69 million | +0.1% |
| 2004 | 522.14 million | -0.1% |
| 2005 | 523.48 million | +0.3% |
| 2006 | 525.16 million | +0.3% |
| 2007 | 528.72 million | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 531.35 million | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 543.45 million | +2.3% |
| 2010 | 550.21 million | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 552.47 million | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 555.90 million | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 554.50 million | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 552.91 million | -0.3% |
| 2015 | 552.58 million | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 555.47 million | +0.5% |
| 2017 | 556.09 million | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 556.36 million | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 556.53 million | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 556.70 million | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 556.93 million | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 557.05 million | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 556.55 million | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 555.23 million | -0.2% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 555.23 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 29% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 555.23 million is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 84.69 million, 6.6× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +136.3% | 666,811 | 1.58 million |
| 1852 | +67.2% | 1.58 million | 2.63 million |
| 1853 | +43.9% | 2.63 million | 3.79 million |
| 1854 | +32.4% | 3.79 million | 5.02 million |
| 1855 | +25.5% | 5.02 million | 6.30 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 5.87 million | 666,811 | 11.78 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 20.32 million | 13.26 million | 27.57 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 37.39 million | 29.28 million | 45.63 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 56.88 million | 47.59 million | 66.33 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 78.28 million | 68.47 million | 88.15 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 107.61 million | 91.07 million | 125.16 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 137.89 million | 128.25 million | 146.32 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 162.64 million | 148.69 million | 177.71 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 208.84 million | 182.36 million | 237.15 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 273.41 million | 243.69 million | 303.39 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 348.71 million | 311.95 million | 382.49 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 407.08 million | 387.81 million | 435.19 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 479.52 million | 443.28 million | 500.85 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 507.66 million | 498.44 million | 511.45 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 515.28 million | 510.00 million | 523.24 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 526.37 million | 521.87 million | 543.45 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 554.30 million | 550.21 million | 556.53 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 556.49 million | 555.23 million | 557.05 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More climate change data for Tunisia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 241.72 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,824 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,319 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,505 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.75 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 125.16 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,551 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,529 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 21.55 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.77 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Tunisia was 555.23 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 557.05 million in 2022.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 666,811 in 1850.
- How does Tunisia rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Tunisia ranks 104th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).