Cumulative co2 land use in Moldova
Moldova: Cumulative co2 land use was 98.64 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
98.64 million
Change on year
down 3.3%
World rank
144th
of 197 countries
All-time high
276.56 million
in 1958
All-time low
4.38 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Moldova, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Moldova recorded 98.64 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024.
That represents a change of down 3.3% on the previous year and down 26.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Moldova peaked at 276.56 million in 1958 and was at its lowest, 4.38 million, in 1850.
Moldova ranks 144th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 175 years of available data.
Cumulative co2 land use in Moldova, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 4.38 million | — |
| 1851 | 8.44 million | +92.6% |
| 1852 | 12.29 million | +45.7% |
| 1853 | 15.97 million | +29.9% |
| 1854 | 19.49 million | +22.0% |
| 1855 | 22.86 million | +17.3% |
| 1856 | 26.12 million | +14.3% |
| 1857 | 29.27 million | +12.0% |
| 1858 | 32.32 million | +10.4% |
| 1859 | 35.28 million | +9.2% |
| 1860 | 38.17 million | +8.2% |
| 1861 | 41.00 million | +7.4% |
| 1862 | 43.77 million | +6.7% |
| 1863 | 46.47 million | +6.2% |
| 1864 | 49.13 million | +5.7% |
| 1865 | 51.75 million | +5.3% |
| 1866 | 54.33 million | +5.0% |
| 1867 | 56.87 million | +4.7% |
| 1868 | 59.37 million | +4.4% |
| 1869 | 61.82 million | +4.1% |
| 1870 | 64.32 million | +4.0% |
| 1871 | 66.83 million | +3.9% |
| 1872 | 69.34 million | +3.8% |
| 1873 | 71.83 million | +3.6% |
| 1874 | 74.32 million | +3.5% |
| 1875 | 76.78 million | +3.3% |
| 1876 | 79.25 million | +3.2% |
| 1877 | 81.69 million | +3.1% |
| 1878 | 84.13 million | +3.0% |
| 1879 | 86.56 million | +2.9% |
| 1880 | 89.01 million | +2.8% |
| 1881 | 91.46 million | +2.8% |
| 1882 | 93.91 million | +2.7% |
| 1883 | 96.35 million | +2.6% |
| 1884 | 98.79 million | +2.5% |
| 1885 | 101.24 million | +2.5% |
| 1886 | 103.69 million | +2.4% |
| 1887 | 106.14 million | +2.4% |
| 1888 | 108.57 million | +2.3% |
| 1889 | 110.99 million | +2.2% |
| 1890 | 113.49 million | +2.2% |
| 1891 | 116.02 million | +2.2% |
| 1892 | 118.58 million | +2.2% |
| 1893 | 121.14 million | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 123.71 million | +2.1% |
| 1895 | 126.28 million | +2.1% |
| 1896 | 128.86 million | +2.0% |
| 1897 | 131.44 million | +2.0% |
| 1898 | 134.02 million | +2.0% |
| 1899 | 136.61 million | +1.9% |
| 1900 | 139.29 million | +2.0% |
| 1901 | 142.02 million | +2.0% |
| 1902 | 144.79 million | +1.9% |
| 1903 | 147.60 million | +1.9% |
| 1904 | 150.43 million | +1.9% |
| 1905 | 153.27 million | +1.9% |
| 1906 | 156.13 million | +1.9% |
| 1907 | 159.01 million | +1.8% |
| 1908 | 161.89 million | +1.8% |
| 1909 | 164.79 million | +1.8% |
| 1910 | 167.35 million | +1.6% |
| 1911 | 169.77 million | +1.4% |
| 1912 | 172.10 million | +1.4% |
| 1913 | 174.36 million | +1.3% |
| 1914 | 176.54 million | +1.3% |
| 1915 | 178.67 million | +1.2% |
| 1916 | 180.75 million | +1.2% |
| 1917 | 182.79 million | +1.1% |
| 1918 | 184.78 million | +1.1% |
| 1919 | 186.73 million | +1.1% |
| 1920 | 188.67 million | +1.0% |
| 1921 | 190.60 million | +1.0% |
| 1922 | 192.50 million | +1.0% |
| 1923 | 194.35 million | +1.0% |
| 1924 | 196.16 million | +0.9% |
| 1925 | 197.97 million | +0.9% |
| 1926 | 199.73 million | +0.9% |
| 1927 | 201.47 million | +0.9% |
| 1928 | 203.19 million | +0.9% |
| 1929 | 204.89 million | +0.8% |
| 1930 | 206.57 million | +0.8% |
| 1931 | 208.23 million | +0.8% |
| 1932 | 209.88 million | +0.8% |
| 1933 | 211.52 million | +0.8% |
| 1934 | 213.17 million | +0.8% |
| 1935 | 214.82 million | +0.8% |
| 1936 | 216.47 million | +0.8% |
| 1937 | 218.10 million | +0.8% |
| 1938 | 219.72 million | +0.7% |
| 1939 | 221.36 million | +0.7% |
| 1940 | 223.15 million | +0.8% |
| 1941 | 225.00 million | +0.8% |
| 1942 | 226.90 million | +0.8% |
| 1943 | 228.86 million | +0.9% |
| 1944 | 230.84 million | +0.9% |
| 1945 | 232.87 million | +0.9% |
| 1946 | 234.93 million | +0.9% |
| 1947 | 236.99 million | +0.9% |
| 1948 | 239.06 million | +0.9% |
| 1949 | 241.16 million | +0.9% |
| 1950 | 243.58 million | +1.0% |
| 1951 | 246.36 million | +1.1% |
| 1952 | 249.55 million | +1.3% |
| 1953 | 253.16 million | +1.4% |
| 1954 | 257.32 million | +1.6% |
| 1955 | 261.74 million | +1.7% |
| 1956 | 266.45 million | +1.8% |
| 1957 | 271.43 million | +1.9% |
| 1958 | 276.56 million | +1.9% |
| 1959 | 275.18 million | -0.5% |
| 1960 | 273.37 million | -0.7% |
| 1961 | 270.88 million | -0.9% |
| 1962 | 267.95 million | -1.1% |
| 1963 | 264.81 million | -1.2% |
| 1964 | 261.18 million | -1.4% |
| 1965 | 257.49 million | -1.4% |
| 1966 | 253.77 million | -1.4% |
| 1967 | 250.35 million | -1.3% |
| 1968 | 246.87 million | -1.4% |
| 1969 | 243.42 million | -1.4% |
| 1970 | 240.02 million | -1.4% |
| 1971 | 236.65 million | -1.4% |
| 1972 | 233.75 million | -1.2% |
| 1973 | 230.73 million | -1.3% |
| 1974 | 227.80 million | -1.3% |
| 1975 | 225.08 million | -1.2% |
| 1976 | 222.26 million | -1.3% |
| 1977 | 219.41 million | -1.3% |
| 1978 | 216.71 million | -1.2% |
| 1979 | 214.23 million | -1.1% |
| 1980 | 211.85 million | -1.1% |
| 1981 | 209.75 million | -1.0% |
| 1982 | 207.57 million | -1.0% |
| 1983 | 205.55 million | -1.0% |
| 1984 | 203.69 million | -0.9% |
| 1985 | 201.96 million | -0.8% |
| 1986 | 200.11 million | -0.9% |
| 1987 | 198.01 million | -1.0% |
| 1988 | 195.62 million | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 193.40 million | -1.1% |
| 1990 | 191.69 million | -0.9% |
| 1991 | 189.64 million | -1.1% |
| 1992 | 187.79 million | -1.0% |
| 1993 | 185.86 million | -1.0% |
| 1994 | 184.23 million | -0.9% |
| 1995 | 182.48 million | -0.9% |
| 1996 | 180.71 million | -1.0% |
| 1997 | 179.00 million | -0.9% |
| 1998 | 176.85 million | -1.2% |
| 1999 | 174.68 million | -1.2% |
| 2000 | 172.47 million | -1.3% |
| 2001 | 170.53 million | -1.1% |
| 2002 | 168.35 million | -1.3% |
| 2003 | 166.07 million | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 163.50 million | -1.5% |
| 2005 | 161.08 million | -1.5% |
| 2006 | 158.67 million | -1.5% |
| 2007 | 156.26 million | -1.5% |
| 2008 | 153.75 million | -1.6% |
| 2009 | 151.70 million | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 149.50 million | -1.4% |
| 2011 | 147.45 million | -1.4% |
| 2012 | 142.65 million | -3.3% |
| 2013 | 138.43 million | -3.0% |
| 2014 | 134.43 million | -2.9% |
| 2015 | 130.54 million | -2.9% |
| 2016 | 126.86 million | -2.8% |
| 2017 | 122.17 million | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 118.33 million | -3.1% |
| 2019 | 114.55 million | -3.2% |
| 2020 | 111.58 million | -2.6% |
| 2021 | 108.66 million | -2.6% |
| 2022 | 105.39 million | -3.0% |
| 2023 | 102.03 million | -3.2% |
| 2024 | 98.64 million | -3.3% |
Moldova compared with similar countries
- Moldova's 98.64 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 16% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Moldova's 98.64 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 23% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Moldova changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +92.6% | 4.38 million | 8.44 million |
| 1852 | +45.7% | 8.44 million | 12.29 million |
| 1853 | +29.9% | 12.29 million | 15.97 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 20.64 million | 4.38 million | 35.28 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 50.27 million | 38.17 million | 61.82 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 75.50 million | 64.32 million | 86.56 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 100.01 million | 89.01 million | 110.99 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 125.01 million | 113.49 million | 136.61 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 151.92 million | 139.29 million | 164.79 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 177.39 million | 167.35 million | 186.73 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 196.95 million | 188.67 million | 204.89 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 213.98 million | 206.57 million | 221.36 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 231.98 million | 223.15 million | 241.16 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 260.13 million | 243.58 million | 276.56 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 259.01 million | 243.42 million | 273.37 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 226.66 million | 214.23 million | 240.02 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 202.75 million | 193.40 million | 211.85 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 183.29 million | 174.68 million | 191.69 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 162.24 million | 151.70 million | 172.47 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 132.49 million | 114.55 million | 149.50 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 105.26 million | 98.64 million | 111.58 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
More climate change data for Moldova
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,722 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 470.72 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,252 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.78 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 44.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 353.98 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 302.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 51.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.84 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Moldova?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Moldova was 98.64 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 276.56 million in 1958.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.38 million in 1850.
- How does Moldova rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Moldova ranks 144th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).