Cumulative co2 land use in Libya
Libya: Cumulative co2 land use was 114.52 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
114.52 million
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
141st
of 197 countries
All-time high
125.15 million
in 1997
All-time low
51,040
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Libya, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Libya is 114.52 million, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.2% on the previous year and down 2.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Libya peaked at 125.15 million in 1997 and was at its lowest, 51,040, in 1850.
Libya ranks 141st of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Libya, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 51,040 | — |
| 1851 | 102,152 | +100.1% |
| 1852 | 152,496 | +49.3% |
| 1853 | 201,813 | +32.3% |
| 1854 | 249,995 | +23.9% |
| 1855 | 297,077 | +18.8% |
| 1856 | 343,097 | +15.5% |
| 1857 | 388,164 | +13.1% |
| 1858 | 432,352 | +11.4% |
| 1859 | 475,697 | +10.0% |
| 1860 | 516,294 | +8.5% |
| 1861 | 556,122 | +7.7% |
| 1862 | 595,876 | +7.1% |
| 1863 | 635,777 | +6.7% |
| 1864 | 675,935 | +6.3% |
| 1865 | 716,385 | +6.0% |
| 1866 | 757,056 | +5.7% |
| 1867 | 797,946 | +5.4% |
| 1868 | 839,056 | +5.2% |
| 1869 | 880,349 | +4.9% |
| 1870 | 930,033 | +5.6% |
| 1871 | 984,370 | +5.8% |
| 1872 | 1.04 million | +5.8% |
| 1873 | 1.10 million | +5.7% |
| 1874 | 1.16 million | +5.5% |
| 1875 | 1.22 million | +5.4% |
| 1876 | 1.29 million | +5.2% |
| 1877 | 1.35 million | +5.0% |
| 1878 | 1.42 million | +4.8% |
| 1879 | 1.48 million | +4.6% |
| 1880 | 1.63 million | +10.1% |
| 1881 | 1.83 million | +11.9% |
| 1882 | 2.05 million | +12.1% |
| 1883 | 2.29 million | +11.7% |
| 1884 | 2.54 million | +11.1% |
| 1885 | 2.80 million | +10.4% |
| 1886 | 3.07 million | +9.7% |
| 1887 | 3.35 million | +9.1% |
| 1888 | 3.64 million | +8.5% |
| 1889 | 3.93 million | +8.0% |
| 1890 | 4.41 million | +12.5% |
| 1891 | 5.01 million | +13.5% |
| 1892 | 5.67 million | +13.1% |
| 1893 | 6.37 million | +12.4% |
| 1894 | 7.10 million | +11.5% |
| 1895 | 7.86 million | +10.7% |
| 1896 | 8.64 million | +9.9% |
| 1897 | 9.43 million | +9.2% |
| 1898 | 10.24 million | +8.6% |
| 1899 | 11.06 million | +8.0% |
| 1900 | 11.69 million | +5.7% |
| 1901 | 12.22 million | +4.6% |
| 1902 | 12.70 million | +3.9% |
| 1903 | 13.15 million | +3.5% |
| 1904 | 13.57 million | +3.2% |
| 1905 | 13.98 million | +3.0% |
| 1906 | 14.37 million | +2.8% |
| 1907 | 14.76 million | +2.7% |
| 1908 | 15.13 million | +2.5% |
| 1909 | 15.50 million | +2.4% |
| 1910 | 15.76 million | +1.6% |
| 1911 | 15.95 million | +1.2% |
| 1912 | 16.10 million | +1.0% |
| 1913 | 16.23 million | +0.8% |
| 1914 | 16.33 million | +0.6% |
| 1915 | 16.42 million | +0.5% |
| 1916 | 16.49 million | +0.4% |
| 1917 | 16.55 million | +0.4% |
| 1918 | 16.60 million | +0.3% |
| 1919 | 16.64 million | +0.3% |
| 1920 | 16.67 million | +0.2% |
| 1921 | 16.69 million | +0.1% |
| 1922 | 16.70 million | +0.1% |
| 1923 | 16.70 million | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 16.70 million | -0.0% |
| 1925 | 16.69 million | -0.0% |
| 1926 | 16.68 million | -0.1% |
| 1927 | 16.66 million | -0.1% |
| 1928 | 16.65 million | -0.1% |
| 1929 | 16.63 million | -0.1% |
| 1930 | 17.34 million | +4.3% |
| 1931 | 18.42 million | +6.3% |
| 1932 | 19.74 million | +7.1% |
| 1933 | 21.20 million | +7.4% |
| 1934 | 22.77 million | +7.4% |
| 1935 | 24.43 million | +7.3% |
| 1936 | 26.15 million | +7.0% |
| 1937 | 27.92 million | +6.8% |
| 1938 | 29.74 million | +6.5% |
| 1939 | 31.60 million | +6.3% |
| 1940 | 33.61 million | +6.4% |
| 1941 | 35.71 million | +6.2% |
| 1942 | 37.87 million | +6.1% |
| 1943 | 40.08 million | +5.8% |
| 1944 | 42.33 million | +5.6% |
| 1945 | 44.61 million | +5.4% |
| 1946 | 46.92 million | +5.2% |
| 1947 | 49.25 million | +5.0% |
| 1948 | 51.60 million | +4.8% |
| 1949 | 53.97 million | +4.6% |
| 1950 | 56.06 million | +3.9% |
| 1951 | 58.61 million | +4.5% |
| 1952 | 61.39 million | +4.8% |
| 1953 | 64.32 million | +4.8% |
| 1954 | 67.33 million | +4.7% |
| 1955 | 70.41 million | +4.6% |
| 1956 | 73.54 million | +4.4% |
| 1957 | 76.72 million | +4.3% |
| 1958 | 79.92 million | +4.2% |
| 1959 | 83.16 million | +4.0% |
| 1960 | 87.58 million | +5.3% |
| 1961 | 90.67 million | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 92.80 million | +2.4% |
| 1963 | 94.60 million | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 95.99 million | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 97.32 million | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 98.40 million | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 99.57 million | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 100.60 million | +1.0% |
| 1969 | 101.54 million | +0.9% |
| 1970 | 102.56 million | +1.0% |
| 1971 | 103.41 million | +0.8% |
| 1972 | 104.28 million | +0.9% |
| 1973 | 105.04 million | +0.7% |
| 1974 | 105.83 million | +0.8% |
| 1975 | 106.50 million | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 107.23 million | +0.7% |
| 1977 | 108.01 million | +0.7% |
| 1978 | 108.62 million | +0.6% |
| 1979 | 109.24 million | +0.6% |
| 1980 | 109.84 million | +0.6% |
| 1981 | 110.49 million | +0.6% |
| 1982 | 111.32 million | +0.8% |
| 1983 | 112.16 million | +0.8% |
| 1984 | 113.07 million | +0.8% |
| 1985 | 113.89 million | +0.7% |
| 1986 | 114.59 million | +0.6% |
| 1987 | 115.08 million | +0.4% |
| 1988 | 115.60 million | +0.5% |
| 1989 | 116.26 million | +0.6% |
| 1990 | 116.82 million | +0.5% |
| 1991 | 116.75 million | -0.1% |
| 1992 | 116.60 million | -0.1% |
| 1993 | 116.46 million | -0.1% |
| 1994 | 116.67 million | +0.2% |
| 1995 | 120.67 million | +3.4% |
| 1996 | 124.94 million | +3.5% |
| 1997 | 125.15 million | +0.2% |
| 1998 | 125.01 million | -0.1% |
| 1999 | 124.75 million | -0.2% |
| 2000 | 124.38 million | -0.3% |
| 2001 | 123.95 million | -0.3% |
| 2002 | 124.12 million | +0.1% |
| 2003 | 123.38 million | -0.6% |
| 2004 | 122.78 million | -0.5% |
| 2005 | 122.17 million | -0.5% |
| 2006 | 121.59 million | -0.5% |
| 2007 | 121.05 million | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 120.89 million | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 120.25 million | -0.5% |
| 2010 | 119.58 million | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 119.07 million | -0.4% |
| 2012 | 118.68 million | -0.3% |
| 2013 | 118.17 million | -0.4% |
| 2014 | 117.67 million | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 117.23 million | -0.4% |
| 2016 | 116.83 million | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 116.45 million | -0.3% |
| 2018 | 116.09 million | -0.3% |
| 2019 | 115.77 million | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 115.47 million | -0.3% |
| 2021 | 115.20 million | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 114.95 million | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 114.72 million | -0.2% |
| 2024 | 114.52 million | -0.2% |
Libya compared with similar countries
- Libya's 114.52 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 18% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Libya's 114.52 million is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 84.69 million, 1.4× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Libya changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +100.1% | 51,040 | 102,152 |
| 1852 | +49.3% | 102,152 | 152,496 |
| 1853 | +32.3% | 152,496 | 201,813 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 269,388 | 51,040 | 475,697 | 10 |
| 1860s | 697,080 | 516,294 | 880,349 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.20 million | 930,033 | 1.48 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.71 million | 1.63 million | 3.93 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 7.58 million | 4.41 million | 11.06 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 13.71 million | 11.69 million | 15.50 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 16.31 million | 15.76 million | 16.64 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 16.67 million | 16.63 million | 16.70 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 23.93 million | 17.34 million | 31.60 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 43.59 million | 33.61 million | 53.97 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 69.15 million | 56.06 million | 83.16 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 95.91 million | 87.58 million | 101.54 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 106.07 million | 102.56 million | 109.24 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 113.23 million | 109.84 million | 116.26 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 120.38 million | 116.46 million | 125.15 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 122.46 million | 120.25 million | 124.38 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 117.56 million | 115.77 million | 119.58 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 114.97 million | 114.52 million | 115.47 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Libya
More climate change data for Libya
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 76.27 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,350 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,621 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,729 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 6.12 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 97.48 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 455.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 452.01 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3.59 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.71 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Libya?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Libya was 114.52 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was 125.15 million in 1997.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was 51,040 in 1850.
- How does Libya rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Libya ranks 141st out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).