Cumulative co2 land use in Suriname
Suriname: Cumulative co2 land use was 166.59 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
166.59 million
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
138th
of 197 countries
All-time high
166.59 million
in 2024
All-time low
212,842
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Suriname, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Suriname stood at 166.59 million. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 8.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Suriname peaked at 166.59 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 212,842, in 1850.
That places Suriname 138th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Suriname, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 212,842 | — |
| 1851 | 420,078 | +97.4% |
| 1852 | 660,839 | +57.3% |
| 1853 | 887,824 | +34.3% |
| 1854 | 1.10 million | +23.9% |
| 1855 | 1.31 million | +19.2% |
| 1856 | 1.52 million | +15.7% |
| 1857 | 1.72 million | +13.4% |
| 1858 | 1.92 million | +11.8% |
| 1859 | 2.13 million | +10.6% |
| 1860 | 2.37 million | +11.2% |
| 1861 | 2.62 million | +10.6% |
| 1862 | 2.93 million | +11.8% |
| 1863 | 3.20 million | +9.6% |
| 1864 | 3.48 million | +8.6% |
| 1865 | 3.75 million | +7.9% |
| 1866 | 4.03 million | +7.3% |
| 1867 | 4.31 million | +6.9% |
| 1868 | 4.58 million | +6.4% |
| 1869 | 4.86 million | +6.1% |
| 1870 | 5.15 million | +5.9% |
| 1871 | 5.43 million | +5.5% |
| 1872 | 5.72 million | +5.3% |
| 1873 | 6.02 million | +5.3% |
| 1874 | 6.35 million | +5.5% |
| 1875 | 6.66 million | +4.9% |
| 1876 | 6.96 million | +4.5% |
| 1877 | 7.26 million | +4.3% |
| 1878 | 7.56 million | +4.1% |
| 1879 | 7.91 million | +4.6% |
| 1880 | 8.22 million | +4.0% |
| 1881 | 8.52 million | +3.7% |
| 1882 | 8.82 million | +3.5% |
| 1883 | 9.12 million | +3.4% |
| 1884 | 9.42 million | +3.3% |
| 1885 | 9.72 million | +3.2% |
| 1886 | 10.02 million | +3.1% |
| 1887 | 10.32 million | +3.0% |
| 1888 | 10.63 million | +2.9% |
| 1889 | 10.93 million | +2.9% |
| 1890 | 11.23 million | +2.8% |
| 1891 | 11.63 million | +3.6% |
| 1892 | 11.97 million | +2.9% |
| 1893 | 12.31 million | +2.8% |
| 1894 | 12.63 million | +2.6% |
| 1895 | 12.95 million | +2.5% |
| 1896 | 13.31 million | +2.8% |
| 1897 | 13.64 million | +2.5% |
| 1898 | 13.96 million | +2.4% |
| 1899 | 14.28 million | +2.3% |
| 1900 | 14.59 million | +2.2% |
| 1901 | 14.91 million | +2.1% |
| 1902 | 15.22 million | +2.1% |
| 1903 | 15.53 million | +2.1% |
| 1904 | 15.91 million | +2.4% |
| 1905 | 16.24 million | +2.1% |
| 1906 | 16.57 million | +2.0% |
| 1907 | 16.89 million | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 17.21 million | +1.9% |
| 1909 | 17.53 million | +1.9% |
| 1910 | 17.94 million | +2.4% |
| 1911 | 18.39 million | +2.5% |
| 1912 | 18.89 million | +2.7% |
| 1913 | 19.38 million | +2.6% |
| 1914 | 19.88 million | +2.6% |
| 1915 | 20.38 million | +2.5% |
| 1916 | 20.89 million | +2.5% |
| 1917 | 21.46 million | +2.7% |
| 1918 | 21.99 million | +2.5% |
| 1919 | 22.52 million | +2.4% |
| 1920 | 23.08 million | +2.5% |
| 1921 | 23.71 million | +2.7% |
| 1922 | 24.28 million | +2.4% |
| 1923 | 24.85 million | +2.3% |
| 1924 | 25.42 million | +2.3% |
| 1925 | 25.99 million | +2.2% |
| 1926 | 26.56 million | +2.2% |
| 1927 | 27.14 million | +2.2% |
| 1928 | 27.73 million | +2.2% |
| 1929 | 28.34 million | +2.2% |
| 1930 | 28.82 million | +1.7% |
| 1931 | 29.25 million | +1.5% |
| 1932 | 29.66 million | +1.4% |
| 1933 | 30.06 million | +1.3% |
| 1934 | 30.45 million | +1.3% |
| 1935 | 30.84 million | +1.3% |
| 1936 | 31.22 million | +1.2% |
| 1937 | 31.61 million | +1.2% |
| 1938 | 31.99 million | +1.2% |
| 1939 | 32.37 million | +1.2% |
| 1940 | 32.73 million | +1.1% |
| 1941 | 33.09 million | +1.1% |
| 1942 | 33.45 million | +1.1% |
| 1943 | 33.80 million | +1.1% |
| 1944 | 34.16 million | +1.1% |
| 1945 | 34.53 million | +1.1% |
| 1946 | 34.89 million | +1.1% |
| 1947 | 35.26 million | +1.1% |
| 1948 | 35.64 million | +1.1% |
| 1949 | 36.02 million | +1.1% |
| 1950 | 36.60 million | +1.6% |
| 1951 | 37.17 million | +1.6% |
| 1952 | 37.73 million | +1.5% |
| 1953 | 38.27 million | +1.4% |
| 1954 | 38.79 million | +1.4% |
| 1955 | 39.40 million | +1.6% |
| 1956 | 39.93 million | +1.3% |
| 1957 | 40.44 million | +1.3% |
| 1958 | 40.89 million | +1.1% |
| 1959 | 41.27 million | +0.9% |
| 1960 | 41.69 million | +1.0% |
| 1961 | 42.49 million | +1.9% |
| 1962 | 43.02 million | +1.3% |
| 1963 | 45.03 million | +4.7% |
| 1964 | 46.30 million | +2.8% |
| 1965 | 47.11 million | +1.8% |
| 1966 | 47.76 million | +1.4% |
| 1967 | 48.35 million | +1.2% |
| 1968 | 49.94 million | +3.3% |
| 1969 | 51.03 million | +2.2% |
| 1970 | 53.09 million | +4.0% |
| 1971 | 54.46 million | +2.6% |
| 1972 | 56.23 million | +3.3% |
| 1973 | 57.58 million | +2.4% |
| 1974 | 58.73 million | +2.0% |
| 1975 | 59.90 million | +2.0% |
| 1976 | 61.32 million | +2.4% |
| 1977 | 62.53 million | +2.0% |
| 1978 | 64.01 million | +2.4% |
| 1979 | 66.61 million | +4.1% |
| 1980 | 69.38 million | +4.2% |
| 1981 | 71.87 million | +3.6% |
| 1982 | 73.90 million | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 76.00 million | +2.8% |
| 1984 | 78.57 million | +3.4% |
| 1985 | 81.13 million | +3.3% |
| 1986 | 84.38 million | +4.0% |
| 1987 | 86.62 million | +2.7% |
| 1988 | 88.17 million | +1.8% |
| 1989 | 89.41 million | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 90.78 million | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 92.18 million | +1.5% |
| 1992 | 96.13 million | +4.3% |
| 1993 | 98.64 million | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 101.73 million | +3.1% |
| 1995 | 104.96 million | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 107.02 million | +2.0% |
| 1997 | 108.92 million | +1.8% |
| 1998 | 112.11 million | +2.9% |
| 1999 | 114.16 million | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 116.84 million | +2.4% |
| 2001 | 118.35 million | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 122.53 million | +3.5% |
| 2003 | 126.54 million | +3.3% |
| 2004 | 128.44 million | +1.5% |
| 2005 | 130.08 million | +1.3% |
| 2006 | 131.05 million | +0.8% |
| 2007 | 132.43 million | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 137.38 million | +3.7% |
| 2009 | 139.41 million | +1.5% |
| 2010 | 141.79 million | +1.7% |
| 2011 | 143.00 million | +0.9% |
| 2012 | 147.65 million | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 151.82 million | +2.8% |
| 2014 | 154.31 million | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 156.16 million | +1.2% |
| 2016 | 158.07 million | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 159.98 million | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 161.73 million | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 163.51 million | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 164.69 million | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 165.47 million | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 166.04 million | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 166.41 million | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 166.59 million | +0.1% |
Suriname compared with similar countries
- Suriname's 166.59 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 26% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Suriname's 166.59 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 10% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Suriname changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +97.4% | 212,842 | 420,078 |
| 1852 | +57.3% | 420,078 | 660,839 |
| 1853 | +34.3% | 660,839 | 887,824 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 1.19 million | 212,842 | 2.13 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 3.61 million | 2.37 million | 4.86 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 6.50 million | 5.15 million | 7.91 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 9.57 million | 8.22 million | 10.93 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 12.79 million | 11.23 million | 14.28 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 16.06 million | 14.59 million | 17.53 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 20.17 million | 17.94 million | 22.52 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 25.71 million | 23.08 million | 28.34 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 30.63 million | 28.82 million | 32.37 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 34.36 million | 32.73 million | 36.02 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 39.05 million | 36.60 million | 41.27 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 46.27 million | 41.69 million | 51.03 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 59.45 million | 53.09 million | 66.61 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 79.94 million | 69.38 million | 89.41 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 102.66 million | 90.78 million | 114.16 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 128.31 million | 116.84 million | 139.41 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 153.80 million | 141.79 million | 163.51 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 165.84 million | 164.69 million | 166.59 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 135 Montenegro 195.06 million compare
- 136 Turkmenistan 183.97 million compare
- 137 Vanuatu 170.38 million compare
- 139 Saudi Arabia 155.60 million compare
- 140 Tajikistan 126.13 million compare
- 141 Libya 114.52 million compare
More climate change data for Suriname
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 8.45 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 240.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 98.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 141.64 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.3725 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 5.06 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 535.59 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 63.02 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 472.57 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2378 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Suriname?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Suriname was 166.59 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 166.59 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 212,842 in 1850.
- How does Suriname rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Suriname ranks 138th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).