Cumulative co2 land use in Oman
Oman: Cumulative co2 land use was -2.66 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-2.66 million
Change on year
up 9.2%
World rank
190th
of 197 countries
All-time high
-6,192
in 1850
All-time low
-8.67 million
in 1981
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Oman, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Oman is -2.66 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 9.2% on the previous year and up 54.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Oman peaked at -6,192 in 1850 and was at its lowest, -8.67 million, in 1981.
Oman ranks 190th of 197 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Oman, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | -6,192 | — |
| 1851 | -13,484 | +117.8% |
| 1852 | -21,654 | +60.6% |
| 1853 | -30,594 | +41.3% |
| 1854 | -40,194 | +31.4% |
| 1855 | -50,417 | +25.4% |
| 1856 | -61,225 | +21.4% |
| 1857 | -72,584 | +18.6% |
| 1858 | -84,455 | +16.4% |
| 1859 | -96,803 | +14.6% |
| 1860 | -109,554 | +13.2% |
| 1861 | -122,671 | +12.0% |
| 1862 | -136,154 | +11.0% |
| 1863 | -149,968 | +10.1% |
| 1864 | -164,111 | +9.4% |
| 1865 | -178,583 | +8.8% |
| 1866 | -193,386 | +8.3% |
| 1867 | -208,518 | +7.8% |
| 1868 | -223,944 | +7.4% |
| 1869 | -239,662 | +7.0% |
| 1870 | -256,333 | +7.0% |
| 1871 | -273,701 | +6.8% |
| 1872 | -291,654 | +6.6% |
| 1873 | -310,121 | +6.3% |
| 1874 | -329,027 | +6.1% |
| 1875 | -348,336 | +5.9% |
| 1876 | -368,012 | +5.6% |
| 1877 | -388,054 | +5.4% |
| 1878 | -408,463 | +5.3% |
| 1879 | -429,201 | +5.1% |
| 1880 | -447,301 | +4.2% |
| 1881 | -463,752 | +3.7% |
| 1882 | -479,068 | +3.3% |
| 1883 | -493,577 | +3.0% |
| 1884 | -507,464 | +2.8% |
| 1885 | -520,838 | +2.6% |
| 1886 | -533,845 | +2.5% |
| 1887 | -546,522 | +2.4% |
| 1888 | -558,980 | +2.3% |
| 1889 | -571,254 | +2.2% |
| 1890 | -584,811 | +2.4% |
| 1891 | -599,064 | +2.4% |
| 1892 | -613,757 | +2.5% |
| 1893 | -628,779 | +2.4% |
| 1894 | -644,021 | +2.4% |
| 1895 | -659,483 | +2.4% |
| 1896 | -675,202 | +2.4% |
| 1897 | -691,140 | +2.4% |
| 1898 | -707,299 | +2.3% |
| 1899 | -723,713 | +2.3% |
| 1900 | -741,154 | +2.4% |
| 1901 | -759,327 | +2.5% |
| 1902 | -778,124 | +2.5% |
| 1903 | -797,470 | +2.5% |
| 1904 | -817,328 | +2.5% |
| 1905 | -837,700 | +2.5% |
| 1906 | -858,548 | +2.5% |
| 1907 | -879,873 | +2.5% |
| 1908 | -901,674 | +2.5% |
| 1909 | -923,951 | +2.5% |
| 1910 | -956,890 | +3.6% |
| 1911 | -997,048 | +4.2% |
| 1912 | -1.04 million | +4.6% |
| 1913 | -1.09 million | +4.8% |
| 1914 | -1.15 million | +4.9% |
| 1915 | -1.20 million | +5.0% |
| 1916 | -1.26 million | +5.0% |
| 1917 | -1.33 million | +4.9% |
| 1918 | -1.39 million | +4.9% |
| 1919 | -1.46 million | +4.8% |
| 1920 | -1.53 million | +4.7% |
| 1921 | -1.60 million | +4.7% |
| 1922 | -1.68 million | +4.7% |
| 1923 | -1.75 million | +4.7% |
| 1924 | -1.84 million | +4.6% |
| 1925 | -1.92 million | +4.6% |
| 1926 | -2.01 million | +4.5% |
| 1927 | -2.09 million | +4.4% |
| 1928 | -2.18 million | +4.3% |
| 1929 | -2.28 million | +4.2% |
| 1930 | -2.37 million | +4.3% |
| 1931 | -2.48 million | +4.3% |
| 1932 | -2.58 million | +4.3% |
| 1933 | -2.69 million | +4.2% |
| 1934 | -2.80 million | +4.1% |
| 1935 | -2.91 million | +4.0% |
| 1936 | -3.03 million | +3.9% |
| 1937 | -3.14 million | +3.8% |
| 1938 | -3.26 million | +3.7% |
| 1939 | -3.38 million | +3.6% |
| 1940 | -3.50 million | +3.7% |
| 1941 | -3.63 million | +3.7% |
| 1942 | -3.76 million | +3.7% |
| 1943 | -3.90 million | +3.7% |
| 1944 | -4.04 million | +3.6% |
| 1945 | -4.19 million | +3.6% |
| 1946 | -4.33 million | +3.5% |
| 1947 | -4.48 million | +3.4% |
| 1948 | -4.63 million | +3.4% |
| 1949 | -4.79 million | +3.3% |
| 1950 | -4.94 million | +3.2% |
| 1951 | -5.09 million | +3.1% |
| 1952 | -5.25 million | +3.0% |
| 1953 | -5.40 million | +3.0% |
| 1954 | -5.57 million | +3.0% |
| 1955 | -5.74 million | +3.1% |
| 1956 | -5.93 million | +3.3% |
| 1957 | -6.15 million | +3.7% |
| 1958 | -6.41 million | +4.3% |
| 1959 | -6.79 million | +5.8% |
| 1960 | -7.11 million | +4.7% |
| 1961 | -7.39 million | +4.0% |
| 1962 | -7.64 million | +3.4% |
| 1963 | -7.84 million | +2.6% |
| 1964 | -8.02 million | +2.4% |
| 1965 | -8.19 million | +2.1% |
| 1966 | -8.30 million | +1.3% |
| 1967 | -8.37 million | +0.9% |
| 1968 | -8.46 million | +1.1% |
| 1969 | -8.51 million | +0.6% |
| 1970 | -8.58 million | +0.8% |
| 1971 | -8.61 million | +0.3% |
| 1972 | -8.63 million | +0.3% |
| 1973 | -8.65 million | +0.2% |
| 1974 | -8.66 million | +0.1% |
| 1975 | -8.66 million | +0.1% |
| 1976 | -8.66 million | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -8.63 million | -0.3% |
| 1978 | -8.63 million | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -8.64 million | +0.1% |
| 1980 | -8.65 million | +0.1% |
| 1981 | -8.67 million | +0.2% |
| 1982 | -8.59 million | -0.9% |
| 1983 | -8.46 million | -1.5% |
| 1984 | -8.34 million | -1.3% |
| 1985 | -8.14 million | -2.5% |
| 1986 | -7.96 million | -2.2% |
| 1987 | -7.78 million | -2.2% |
| 1988 | -7.58 million | -2.6% |
| 1989 | -7.37 million | -2.7% |
| 1990 | -7.24 million | -1.8% |
| 1991 | -7.08 million | -2.3% |
| 1992 | -7.06 million | -0.3% |
| 1993 | -7.04 million | -0.2% |
| 1994 | -7.04 million | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -7.03 million | -0.1% |
| 1996 | -7.02 million | -0.1% |
| 1997 | -6.99 million | -0.5% |
| 1998 | -6.90 million | -1.2% |
| 1999 | -6.79 million | -1.6% |
| 2000 | -6.70 million | -1.3% |
| 2001 | -6.63 million | -0.9% |
| 2002 | -6.60 million | -0.6% |
| 2003 | -6.57 million | -0.4% |
| 2004 | -6.60 million | +0.5% |
| 2005 | -6.65 million | +0.7% |
| 2006 | -6.64 million | -0.2% |
| 2007 | -6.58 million | -0.8% |
| 2008 | -6.41 million | -2.6% |
| 2009 | -6.34 million | -1.2% |
| 2010 | -6.21 million | -2.0% |
| 2011 | -6.17 million | -0.7% |
| 2012 | -6.18 million | +0.2% |
| 2013 | -6.18 million | -0.0% |
| 2014 | -5.82 million | -5.8% |
| 2015 | -5.58 million | -4.1% |
| 2016 | -5.03 million | -9.8% |
| 2017 | -4.53 million | -10.1% |
| 2018 | -4.22 million | -6.8% |
| 2019 | -3.97 million | -5.8% |
| 2020 | -3.82 million | -3.8% |
| 2021 | -3.49 million | -8.7% |
| 2022 | -3.20 million | -8.3% |
| 2023 | -2.93 million | -8.6% |
| 2024 | -2.66 million | -9.2% |
Oman compared with similar countries
- Oman's -2.66 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million. (64 countries reporting)
- Oman's -2.66 million is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 84.69 million. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Oman changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | -117.8% | -6,192 | -13,484 |
| 1852 | -60.6% | -13,484 | -21,654 |
| 1853 | -41.3% | -21,654 | -30,594 |
| 1854 | -31.4% | -30,594 | -40,194 |
| 1855 | -25.4% | -40,194 | -50,417 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | -47,760 | -96,803 | -6,192 | 10 |
| 1860s | -172,655 | -239,662 | -109,554 | 10 |
| 1870s | -340,290 | -429,201 | -256,333 | 10 |
| 1880s | -512,260 | -571,254 | -447,301 | 10 |
| 1890s | -652,727 | -723,713 | -584,811 | 10 |
| 1900s | -829,515 | -923,951 | -741,154 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.19 million | -1.46 million | -956,890 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.89 million | -2.28 million | -1.53 million | 10 |
| 1930s | -2.86 million | -3.38 million | -2.37 million | 10 |
| 1940s | -4.13 million | -4.79 million | -3.50 million | 10 |
| 1950s | -5.73 million | -6.79 million | -4.94 million | 10 |
| 1960s | -7.98 million | -8.51 million | -7.11 million | 10 |
| 1970s | -8.64 million | -8.66 million | -8.58 million | 10 |
| 1980s | -8.15 million | -8.67 million | -7.37 million | 10 |
| 1990s | -7.02 million | -7.24 million | -6.79 million | 10 |
| 2000s | -6.57 million | -6.70 million | -6.34 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -5.39 million | -6.21 million | -3.97 million | 10 |
| 2020s | -3.22 million | -3.82 million | -2.66 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Oman
More climate change data for Oman
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 5.10 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,034 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 331.89 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 701.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.25 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 30.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 30.48 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 0.2268 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.115 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Oman?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Oman was -2.66 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Oman?
- The highest recorded value was -6,192 in 1850.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Oman?
- The lowest recorded value was -8.67 million in 1981.
- How does Oman rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Oman ranks 190th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Oman?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Oman data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).