Cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda
Antigua and Barbuda: Cumulative co2 land use was -11.52 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Antigua and Barbuda recorded -11.52 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 2.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda peaked at 218,228 in 1855 and was at its lowest, -11.52 million, in 2024.
That places Antigua and Barbuda 192nd out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 93,982 | — |
| 1851 | 149,015 | +58.6% |
| 1852 | 183,347 | +23.0% |
| 1853 | 204,048 | +11.3% |
| 1854 | 214,894 | +5.3% |
| 1855 | 218,228 | +1.6% |
| 1856 | 215,626 | -1.2% |
| 1857 | 208,225 | -3.4% |
| 1858 | 196,867 | -5.5% |
| 1859 | 182,174 | -7.5% |
| 1860 | 165,649 | -9.1% |
| 1861 | 147,146 | -11.2% |
| 1862 | 126,811 | -13.8% |
| 1863 | 104,827 | -17.3% |
| 1864 | 81,414 | -22.3% |
| 1865 | 56,755 | -30.3% |
| 1866 | 31,034 | -45.3% |
| 1867 | 4,360 | -86.0% |
| 1868 | -23,120 | -630.2% |
| 1869 | -51,333 | +122.0% |
| 1870 | -76,504 | +49.0% |
| 1871 | -100,797 | +31.8% |
| 1872 | -124,832 | +23.8% |
| 1873 | -148,868 | +19.3% |
| 1874 | -173,014 | +16.2% |
| 1875 | -197,306 | +14.0% |
| 1876 | -221,782 | +12.4% |
| 1877 | -246,404 | +11.1% |
| 1878 | -271,173 | +10.1% |
| 1879 | -296,051 | +9.2% |
| 1880 | -313,822 | +6.0% |
| 1881 | -328,844 | +4.8% |
| 1882 | -342,511 | +4.2% |
| 1883 | -355,408 | +3.8% |
| 1884 | -367,829 | +3.5% |
| 1885 | -379,957 | +3.3% |
| 1886 | -391,865 | +3.1% |
| 1887 | -403,590 | +3.0% |
| 1888 | -415,204 | +2.9% |
| 1889 | -426,709 | +2.8% |
| 1890 | -445,103 | +4.3% |
| 1891 | -466,244 | +4.7% |
| 1892 | -488,741 | +4.8% |
| 1893 | -512,044 | +4.8% |
| 1894 | -535,823 | +4.6% |
| 1895 | -559,932 | +4.5% |
| 1896 | -584,298 | +4.4% |
| 1897 | -608,810 | +4.2% |
| 1898 | -633,506 | +4.1% |
| 1899 | -658,348 | +3.9% |
| 1900 | -677,950 | +3.0% |
| 1901 | -698,871 | +3.1% |
| 1902 | -722,944 | +3.4% |
| 1903 | -750,790 | +3.9% |
| 1904 | -782,594 | +4.2% |
| 1905 | -818,354 | +4.6% |
| 1906 | -857,962 | +4.8% |
| 1907 | -901,307 | +5.1% |
| 1908 | -948,243 | +5.2% |
| 1909 | -998,587 | +5.3% |
| 1910 | -1.07 million | +6.9% |
| 1911 | -1.14 million | +7.0% |
| 1912 | -1.22 million | +6.7% |
| 1913 | -1.30 million | +6.3% |
| 1914 | -1.37 million | +5.9% |
| 1915 | -1.45 million | +5.5% |
| 1916 | -1.52 million | +5.2% |
| 1917 | -1.60 million | +4.9% |
| 1918 | -1.67 million | +4.6% |
| 1919 | -1.74 million | +4.3% |
| 1920 | -1.80 million | +3.3% |
| 1921 | -1.85 million | +2.8% |
| 1922 | -1.90 million | +2.5% |
| 1923 | -1.94 million | +2.3% |
| 1924 | -1.98 million | +2.2% |
| 1925 | -2.02 million | +2.0% |
| 1926 | -2.06 million | +1.9% |
| 1927 | -2.10 million | +1.8% |
| 1928 | -2.13 million | +1.8% |
| 1929 | -2.17 million | +1.7% |
| 1930 | -2.20 million | +1.3% |
| 1931 | -2.22 million | +1.1% |
| 1932 | -2.24 million | +1.0% |
| 1933 | -2.27 million | +0.9% |
| 1934 | -2.28 million | +0.8% |
| 1935 | -2.30 million | +0.8% |
| 1936 | -2.32 million | +0.7% |
| 1937 | -2.34 million | +0.7% |
| 1938 | -2.35 million | +0.7% |
| 1939 | -2.37 million | +0.6% |
| 1940 | -2.38 million | +0.5% |
| 1941 | -2.39 million | +0.4% |
| 1942 | -2.39 million | +0.3% |
| 1943 | -2.40 million | +0.3% |
| 1944 | -2.41 million | +0.2% |
| 1945 | -2.41 million | +0.2% |
| 1946 | -2.42 million | +0.2% |
| 1947 | -2.42 million | +0.2% |
| 1948 | -2.42 million | +0.1% |
| 1949 | -2.43 million | +0.1% |
| 1950 | -2.41 million | -0.6% |
| 1951 | -2.40 million | -0.5% |
| 1952 | -2.39 million | -0.2% |
| 1953 | -2.40 million | +0.2% |
| 1954 | -2.41 million | +0.4% |
| 1955 | -2.42 million | +0.7% |
| 1956 | -2.44 million | +0.8% |
| 1957 | -2.48 million | +1.5% |
| 1958 | -2.59 million | +4.3% |
| 1959 | -2.93 million | +13.1% |
| 1960 | -3.25 million | +11.1% |
| 1961 | -3.59 million | +10.5% |
| 1962 | -3.92 million | +9.1% |
| 1963 | -4.24 million | +8.0% |
| 1964 | -4.61 million | +8.8% |
| 1965 | -4.92 million | +6.9% |
| 1966 | -5.22 million | +5.9% |
| 1967 | -5.49 million | +5.3% |
| 1968 | -5.75 million | +4.8% |
| 1969 | -6.00 million | +4.4% |
| 1970 | -6.10 million | +1.5% |
| 1971 | -6.29 million | +3.2% |
| 1972 | -6.50 million | +3.3% |
| 1973 | -6.71 million | +3.2% |
| 1974 | -6.92 million | +3.1% |
| 1975 | -7.12 million | +2.9% |
| 1976 | -7.31 million | +2.7% |
| 1977 | -7.50 million | +2.6% |
| 1978 | -7.68 million | +2.4% |
| 1979 | -7.85 million | +2.3% |
| 1980 | -8.02 million | +2.1% |
| 1981 | -8.18 million | +2.0% |
| 1982 | -8.34 million | +1.9% |
| 1983 | -8.55 million | +2.5% |
| 1984 | -8.71 million | +2.0% |
| 1985 | -8.87 million | +1.7% |
| 1986 | -9.01 million | +1.6% |
| 1987 | -9.14 million | +1.5% |
| 1988 | -9.27 million | +1.4% |
| 1989 | -9.39 million | +1.3% |
| 1990 | -9.51 million | +1.3% |
| 1991 | -9.63 million | +1.2% |
| 1992 | -9.73 million | +1.1% |
| 1993 | -9.84 million | +1.1% |
| 1994 | -9.94 million | +1.0% |
| 1995 | -10.03 million | +1.0% |
| 1996 | -10.13 million | +0.9% |
| 1997 | -10.22 million | +0.9% |
| 1998 | -10.30 million | +0.8% |
| 1999 | -10.38 million | +0.8% |
| 2000 | -10.46 million | +0.7% |
| 2001 | -10.53 million | +0.7% |
| 2002 | -10.60 million | +0.7% |
| 2003 | -10.67 million | +0.6% |
| 2004 | -10.74 million | +0.6% |
| 2005 | -10.80 million | +0.6% |
| 2006 | -10.86 million | +0.6% |
| 2007 | -10.91 million | +0.4% |
| 2008 | -10.95 million | +0.4% |
| 2009 | -10.99 million | +0.4% |
| 2010 | -11.04 million | +0.5% |
| 2011 | -11.09 million | +0.4% |
| 2012 | -11.14 million | +0.4% |
| 2013 | -11.16 million | +0.2% |
| 2014 | -11.20 million | +0.3% |
| 2015 | -11.24 million | +0.4% |
| 2016 | -11.28 million | +0.3% |
| 2017 | -11.29 million | +0.1% |
| 2018 | -11.33 million | +0.3% |
| 2019 | -11.36 million | +0.3% |
| 2020 | -11.40 million | +0.3% |
| 2021 | -11.43 million | +0.3% |
| 2022 | -11.46 million | +0.3% |
| 2023 | -11.49 million | +0.2% |
| 2024 | -11.52 million | +0.2% |
Antigua and Barbuda compared with similar countries
- Antigua and Barbuda's -11.52 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million. (64 countries reporting)
- Antigua and Barbuda's -11.52 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1868 | -630.2% | 4,360 | -23,120 |
| 1869 | -122.0% | -23,120 | -51,333 |
| 1867 | -86.0% | 31,034 | 4,360 |
| 1851 | +58.6% | 93,982 | 149,015 |
| 1870 | -49.0% | -51,333 | -76,504 |
| 1866 | -45.3% | 56,755 | 31,034 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 186,641 | 93,982 | 218,228 | 10 |
| 1860s | 64,354 | -51,333 | 165,649 | 10 |
| 1870s | -185,673 | -296,051 | -76,504 | 10 |
| 1880s | -372,574 | -426,709 | -313,822 | 10 |
| 1890s | -549,285 | -658,348 | -445,103 | 10 |
| 1900s | -815,760 | -998,587 | -677,950 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.41 million | -1.74 million | -1.07 million | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.99 million | -2.17 million | -1.80 million | 10 |
| 1930s | -2.29 million | -2.37 million | -2.20 million | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.41 million | -2.43 million | -2.38 million | 10 |
| 1950s | -2.49 million | -2.93 million | -2.39 million | 10 |
| 1960s | -4.70 million | -6.00 million | -3.25 million | 10 |
| 1970s | -7.00 million | -7.85 million | -6.10 million | 10 |
| 1980s | -8.75 million | -9.39 million | -8.02 million | 10 |
| 1990s | -9.97 million | -10.38 million | -9.51 million | 10 |
| 2000s | -10.75 million | -10.99 million | -10.46 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -11.21 million | -11.36 million | -11.04 million | 10 |
| 2020s | -11.46 million | -11.52 million | -11.40 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda
More climate change data for Antigua and Barbuda
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 11,200 kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 66.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 17.54 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 49.1 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.0662 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.75 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 0.0823 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 0.0795 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 0.0028 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0003 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Antigua and Barbuda was -11.52 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The highest recorded value was 218,228 in 1855.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
- The lowest recorded value was -11.52 million in 2024.
- How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 192nd out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).