Cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Cumulative co2 land use was -96.95 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-96.95 million
Change on year
up 1.4%
World rank
194th
of 197 countries
All-time high
36.56 million
in 1892
All-time low
-123.62 million
in 1995
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea is -96.95 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.4% on the previous year and up 13.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 36.56 million in 1892 and was at its lowest, -123.62 million, in 1995.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 194th of 197 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 665,932 | — |
| 1851 | 1.19 million | +78.6% |
| 1852 | 1.47 million | +23.9% |
| 1853 | 1.40 million | -5.2% |
| 1854 | 1.33 million | -4.7% |
| 1855 | 1.26 million | -5.6% |
| 1856 | 953,556 | -24.1% |
| 1857 | 1.31 million | +37.9% |
| 1858 | 1.12 million | -14.4% |
| 1859 | 1.27 million | +13.1% |
| 1860 | 1.27 million | -0.1% |
| 1861 | 1.57 million | +23.4% |
| 1862 | 1.91 million | +22.0% |
| 1863 | 2.27 million | +18.4% |
| 1864 | 2.70 million | +19.1% |
| 1865 | 3.33 million | +23.5% |
| 1866 | 3.79 million | +13.7% |
| 1867 | 4.36 million | +15.2% |
| 1868 | 4.83 million | +10.7% |
| 1869 | 5.44 million | +12.8% |
| 1870 | 6.73 million | +23.7% |
| 1871 | 7.64 million | +13.4% |
| 1872 | 8.72 million | +14.1% |
| 1873 | 9.78 million | +12.2% |
| 1874 | 10.76 million | +10.0% |
| 1875 | 11.90 million | +10.6% |
| 1876 | 13.38 million | +12.5% |
| 1877 | 14.96 million | +11.8% |
| 1878 | 17.33 million | +15.8% |
| 1879 | 18.97 million | +9.5% |
| 1880 | 21.18 million | +11.7% |
| 1881 | 22.57 million | +6.6% |
| 1882 | 24.13 million | +6.9% |
| 1883 | 25.07 million | +3.9% |
| 1884 | 26.41 million | +5.4% |
| 1885 | 27.69 million | +4.8% |
| 1886 | 29.28 million | +5.8% |
| 1887 | 30.11 million | +2.8% |
| 1888 | 33.60 million | +11.6% |
| 1889 | 35.25 million | +4.9% |
| 1890 | 36.00 million | +2.1% |
| 1891 | 36.44 million | +1.2% |
| 1892 | 36.56 million | +0.3% |
| 1893 | 36.54 million | -0.0% |
| 1894 | 36.33 million | -0.6% |
| 1895 | 36.15 million | -0.5% |
| 1896 | 35.29 million | -2.4% |
| 1897 | 34.84 million | -1.3% |
| 1898 | 34.53 million | -0.9% |
| 1899 | 34.00 million | -1.5% |
| 1900 | 33.49 million | -1.5% |
| 1901 | 32.42 million | -3.2% |
| 1902 | 31.47 million | -2.9% |
| 1903 | 29.72 million | -5.6% |
| 1904 | 28.57 million | -3.9% |
| 1905 | 27.21 million | -4.8% |
| 1906 | 26.16 million | -3.8% |
| 1907 | 24.69 million | -5.6% |
| 1908 | 22.80 million | -7.7% |
| 1909 | 21.08 million | -7.5% |
| 1910 | 19.78 million | -6.1% |
| 1911 | 18.05 million | -8.8% |
| 1912 | 17.34 million | -3.9% |
| 1913 | 16.04 million | -7.5% |
| 1914 | 14.44 million | -10.0% |
| 1915 | 12.40 million | -14.1% |
| 1916 | 10.97 million | -11.5% |
| 1917 | 9.29 million | -15.3% |
| 1918 | 8.05 million | -13.3% |
| 1919 | 6.61 million | -17.9% |
| 1920 | 6.04 million | -8.7% |
| 1921 | 6.10 million | +1.0% |
| 1922 | 5.98 million | -2.0% |
| 1923 | 6.43 million | +7.5% |
| 1924 | 6.94 million | +7.9% |
| 1925 | 8.19 million | +18.1% |
| 1926 | 9.50 million | +15.9% |
| 1927 | 10.89 million | +14.6% |
| 1928 | 12.75 million | +17.1% |
| 1929 | 14.50 million | +13.8% |
| 1930 | 14.45 million | -0.4% |
| 1931 | 12.78 million | -11.6% |
| 1932 | 11.25 million | -12.0% |
| 1933 | 8.65 million | -23.1% |
| 1934 | 3.92 million | -54.7% |
| 1935 | -493,321 | -112.6% |
| 1936 | -5.31 million | +976.0% |
| 1937 | -10.72 million | +102.0% |
| 1938 | -17.21 million | +60.5% |
| 1939 | -23.92 million | +39.0% |
| 1940 | -30.25 million | +26.5% |
| 1941 | -36.31 million | +20.0% |
| 1942 | -42.00 million | +15.7% |
| 1943 | -46.46 million | +10.6% |
| 1944 | -50.33 million | +8.3% |
| 1945 | -54.51 million | +8.3% |
| 1946 | -57.85 million | +6.1% |
| 1947 | -60.61 million | +4.8% |
| 1948 | -63.94 million | +5.5% |
| 1949 | -67.14 million | +5.0% |
| 1950 | -69.33 million | +3.3% |
| 1951 | -71.16 million | +2.6% |
| 1952 | -72.97 million | +2.6% |
| 1953 | -73.21 million | +0.3% |
| 1954 | -74.77 million | +2.1% |
| 1955 | -75.90 million | +1.5% |
| 1956 | -76.50 million | +0.8% |
| 1957 | -77.81 million | +1.7% |
| 1958 | -77.72 million | -0.1% |
| 1959 | -79.69 million | +2.5% |
| 1960 | -80.19 million | +0.6% |
| 1961 | -80.65 million | +0.6% |
| 1962 | -82.63 million | +2.4% |
| 1963 | -84.68 million | +2.5% |
| 1964 | -84.98 million | +0.4% |
| 1965 | -85.84 million | +1.0% |
| 1966 | -86.43 million | +0.7% |
| 1967 | -88.34 million | +2.2% |
| 1968 | -89.23 million | +1.0% |
| 1969 | -90.35 million | +1.3% |
| 1970 | -91.13 million | +0.9% |
| 1971 | -92.38 million | +1.4% |
| 1972 | -93.68 million | +1.4% |
| 1973 | -95.06 million | +1.5% |
| 1974 | -96.48 million | +1.5% |
| 1975 | -97.94 million | +1.5% |
| 1976 | -99.32 million | +1.4% |
| 1977 | -101.20 million | +1.9% |
| 1978 | -103.04 million | +1.8% |
| 1979 | -104.80 million | +1.7% |
| 1980 | -106.01 million | +1.2% |
| 1981 | -108.21 million | +2.1% |
| 1982 | -109.42 million | +1.1% |
| 1983 | -110.79 million | +1.2% |
| 1984 | -112.61 million | +1.6% |
| 1985 | -113.58 million | +0.9% |
| 1986 | -114.78 million | +1.1% |
| 1987 | -116.89 million | +1.8% |
| 1988 | -117.74 million | +0.7% |
| 1989 | -117.65 million | -0.1% |
| 1990 | -118.71 million | +0.9% |
| 1991 | -119.44 million | +0.6% |
| 1992 | -121.05 million | +1.3% |
| 1993 | -121.76 million | +0.6% |
| 1994 | -122.61 million | +0.7% |
| 1995 | -123.62 million | +0.8% |
| 1996 | -122.35 million | -1.0% |
| 1997 | -122.51 million | +0.1% |
| 1998 | -121.44 million | -0.9% |
| 1999 | -120.50 million | -0.8% |
| 2000 | -120.01 million | -0.4% |
| 2001 | -119.94 million | -0.1% |
| 2002 | -118.70 million | -1.0% |
| 2003 | -118.22 million | -0.4% |
| 2004 | -117.34 million | -0.7% |
| 2005 | -116.75 million | -0.5% |
| 2006 | -116.33 million | -0.4% |
| 2007 | -115.38 million | -0.8% |
| 2008 | -114.53 million | -0.7% |
| 2009 | -112.25 million | -2.0% |
| 2010 | -112.64 million | +0.4% |
| 2011 | -112.31 million | -0.3% |
| 2012 | -112.99 million | +0.6% |
| 2013 | -112.00 million | -0.9% |
| 2014 | -112.09 million | +0.1% |
| 2015 | -110.93 million | -1.0% |
| 2016 | -110.23 million | -0.6% |
| 2017 | -108.31 million | -1.7% |
| 2018 | -107.24 million | -1.0% |
| 2019 | -105.85 million | -1.3% |
| 2020 | -103.64 million | -2.1% |
| 2021 | -101.86 million | -1.7% |
| 2022 | -99.68 million | -2.1% |
| 2023 | -98.33 million | -1.4% |
| 2024 | -96.95 million | -1.4% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's -96.95 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million. (58 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's -96.95 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1936 | -976.0% | -493,321 | -5.31 million |
| 1935 | -112.6% | 3.92 million | -493,321 |
| 1937 | -102.0% | -5.31 million | -10.72 million |
| 1851 | +78.6% | 665,932 | 1.19 million |
| 1938 | -60.5% | -10.72 million | -17.21 million |
| 1934 | -54.7% | 8.65 million | 3.92 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 1.20 million | 665,932 | 1.47 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 3.15 million | 1.27 million | 5.44 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 12.02 million | 6.73 million | 18.97 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 27.53 million | 21.18 million | 35.25 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 35.67 million | 34.00 million | 36.56 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 27.76 million | 21.08 million | 33.49 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 13.30 million | 6.61 million | 19.78 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 8.73 million | 5.98 million | 14.50 million | 10 |
| 1930s | -660,343 | -23.92 million | 14.45 million | 10 |
| 1940s | -50.94 million | -67.14 million | -30.25 million | 10 |
| 1950s | -74.91 million | -79.69 million | -69.33 million | 10 |
| 1960s | -85.33 million | -90.35 million | -80.19 million | 10 |
| 1970s | -97.50 million | -104.80 million | -91.13 million | 10 |
| 1980s | -112.77 million | -117.74 million | -106.01 million | 10 |
| 1990s | -121.40 million | -123.62 million | -118.71 million | 10 |
| 2000s | -116.95 million | -120.01 million | -112.25 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -110.46 million | -112.99 million | -105.85 million | 10 |
| 2020s | -100.09 million | -103.64 million | -96.95 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More climate change data for Equatorial Guinea
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 300,667 kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 25.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 10.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.0402 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.5221 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0063 kt (2050)
- Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq) 1.67 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Equatorial Guinea was -96.95 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 36.56 million in 1892.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was -123.62 million in 1995.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 194th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).