Cumulative co2 land use in Czechia
Czechia: Cumulative co2 land use was -220.63 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-220.63 million
Change on year
down 2.6%
World rank
195th
of 197 countries
All-time high
615.28 million
in 1929
All-time low
-220.63 million
in 2024
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Czechia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Czechia recorded -220.63 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.6% on the previous year and down 31.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Czechia peaked at 615.28 million in 1929 and was at its lowest, -220.63 million, in 2024.
Czechia ranks 195th of 197 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Czechia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 10.07 million | — |
| 1851 | 20.42 million | +102.8% |
| 1852 | 30.88 million | +51.2% |
| 1853 | 41.36 million | +33.9% |
| 1854 | 51.91 million | +25.5% |
| 1855 | 62.48 million | +20.4% |
| 1856 | 73.05 million | +16.9% |
| 1857 | 83.62 million | +14.5% |
| 1858 | 94.16 million | +12.6% |
| 1859 | 104.70 million | +11.2% |
| 1860 | 115.57 million | +10.4% |
| 1861 | 126.46 million | +9.4% |
| 1862 | 137.44 million | +8.7% |
| 1863 | 148.48 million | +8.0% |
| 1864 | 159.51 million | +7.4% |
| 1865 | 170.60 million | +7.0% |
| 1866 | 181.67 million | +6.5% |
| 1867 | 192.96 million | +6.2% |
| 1868 | 204.10 million | +5.8% |
| 1869 | 215.25 million | +5.5% |
| 1870 | 225.85 million | +4.9% |
| 1871 | 236.36 million | +4.7% |
| 1872 | 246.78 million | +4.4% |
| 1873 | 257.13 million | +4.2% |
| 1874 | 267.41 million | +4.0% |
| 1875 | 277.60 million | +3.8% |
| 1876 | 287.70 million | +3.6% |
| 1877 | 297.73 million | +3.5% |
| 1878 | 307.65 million | +3.3% |
| 1879 | 317.51 million | +3.2% |
| 1880 | 326.26 million | +2.8% |
| 1881 | 334.48 million | +2.5% |
| 1882 | 342.41 million | +2.4% |
| 1883 | 350.09 million | +2.2% |
| 1884 | 357.51 million | +2.1% |
| 1885 | 364.74 million | +2.0% |
| 1886 | 371.77 million | +1.9% |
| 1887 | 378.84 million | +1.9% |
| 1888 | 385.56 million | +1.8% |
| 1889 | 392.14 million | +1.7% |
| 1890 | 399.79 million | +1.9% |
| 1891 | 407.87 million | +2.0% |
| 1892 | 416.22 million | +2.0% |
| 1893 | 424.76 million | +2.1% |
| 1894 | 433.49 million | +2.1% |
| 1895 | 442.36 million | +2.0% |
| 1896 | 451.25 million | +2.0% |
| 1897 | 460.22 million | +2.0% |
| 1898 | 469.24 million | +2.0% |
| 1899 | 478.33 million | +1.9% |
| 1900 | 487.95 million | +2.0% |
| 1901 | 497.67 million | +2.0% |
| 1902 | 507.52 million | +2.0% |
| 1903 | 517.50 million | +2.0% |
| 1904 | 527.58 million | +1.9% |
| 1905 | 537.75 million | +1.9% |
| 1906 | 547.99 million | +1.9% |
| 1907 | 558.18 million | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 568.44 million | +1.8% |
| 1909 | 578.71 million | +1.8% |
| 1910 | 586.02 million | +1.3% |
| 1911 | 592.02 million | +1.0% |
| 1912 | 596.77 million | +0.8% |
| 1913 | 600.54 million | +0.6% |
| 1914 | 603.40 million | +0.5% |
| 1915 | 605.33 million | +0.3% |
| 1916 | 606.51 million | +0.2% |
| 1917 | 606.95 million | +0.1% |
| 1918 | 606.88 million | -0.0% |
| 1919 | 606.03 million | -0.1% |
| 1920 | 605.80 million | -0.0% |
| 1921 | 605.95 million | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 606.34 million | +0.1% |
| 1923 | 607.03 million | +0.1% |
| 1924 | 607.87 million | +0.1% |
| 1925 | 608.93 million | +0.2% |
| 1926 | 610.16 million | +0.2% |
| 1927 | 611.63 million | +0.2% |
| 1928 | 613.39 million | +0.3% |
| 1929 | 615.28 million | +0.3% |
| 1930 | 614.84 million | -0.1% |
| 1931 | 612.31 million | -0.4% |
| 1932 | 608.13 million | -0.7% |
| 1933 | 602.31 million | -1.0% |
| 1934 | 595.02 million | -1.2% |
| 1935 | 586.13 million | -1.5% |
| 1936 | 575.82 million | -1.8% |
| 1937 | 564.17 million | -2.0% |
| 1938 | 551.32 million | -2.3% |
| 1939 | 537.20 million | -2.6% |
| 1940 | 522.48 million | -2.7% |
| 1941 | 507.15 million | -2.9% |
| 1942 | 491.36 million | -3.1% |
| 1943 | 475.11 million | -3.3% |
| 1944 | 458.31 million | -3.5% |
| 1945 | 441.00 million | -3.8% |
| 1946 | 423.24 million | -4.0% |
| 1947 | 405.04 million | -4.3% |
| 1948 | 386.42 million | -4.6% |
| 1949 | 367.37 million | -4.9% |
| 1950 | 364.11 million | -0.9% |
| 1951 | 352.19 million | -3.3% |
| 1952 | 339.46 million | -3.6% |
| 1953 | 326.91 million | -3.7% |
| 1954 | 314.48 million | -3.8% |
| 1955 | 302.14 million | -3.9% |
| 1956 | 289.86 million | -4.1% |
| 1957 | 277.70 million | -4.2% |
| 1958 | 265.51 million | -4.4% |
| 1959 | 267.86 million | +0.9% |
| 1960 | 269.60 million | +0.7% |
| 1961 | 262.90 million | -2.5% |
| 1962 | 254.46 million | -3.2% |
| 1963 | 245.34 million | -3.6% |
| 1964 | 235.78 million | -3.9% |
| 1965 | 226.02 million | -4.1% |
| 1966 | 216.22 million | -4.3% |
| 1967 | 206.44 million | -4.5% |
| 1968 | 196.67 million | -4.7% |
| 1969 | 187.24 million | -4.8% |
| 1970 | 178.13 million | -4.9% |
| 1971 | 169.10 million | -5.1% |
| 1972 | 160.13 million | -5.3% |
| 1973 | 151.21 million | -5.6% |
| 1974 | 142.27 million | -5.9% |
| 1975 | 133.70 million | -6.0% |
| 1976 | 125.56 million | -6.1% |
| 1977 | 117.57 million | -6.4% |
| 1978 | 109.59 million | -6.8% |
| 1979 | 101.50 million | -7.4% |
| 1980 | 94.16 million | -7.2% |
| 1981 | 86.92 million | -7.7% |
| 1982 | 79.96 million | -8.0% |
| 1983 | 73.32 million | -8.3% |
| 1984 | 66.67 million | -9.1% |
| 1985 | 60.32 million | -9.5% |
| 1986 | 54.11 million | -10.3% |
| 1987 | 48.03 million | -11.2% |
| 1988 | 42.14 million | -12.3% |
| 1989 | 37.08 million | -12.0% |
| 1990 | 31.20 million | -15.9% |
| 1991 | 25.27 million | -19.0% |
| 1992 | 19.23 million | -23.9% |
| 1993 | 13.54 million | -29.6% |
| 1994 | 9.05 million | -33.1% |
| 1995 | 3.98 million | -56.0% |
| 1996 | -398,464 | -110.0% |
| 1997 | -4.14 million | +939.8% |
| 1998 | -6.89 million | +66.2% |
| 1999 | -10.11 million | +46.8% |
| 2000 | -13.21 million | +30.7% |
| 2001 | -28.60 million | +116.5% |
| 2002 | -41.94 million | +46.7% |
| 2003 | -55.82 million | +33.1% |
| 2004 | -69.33 million | +24.2% |
| 2005 | -83.11 million | +19.9% |
| 2006 | -93.84 million | +12.9% |
| 2007 | -105.03 million | +11.9% |
| 2008 | -116.08 million | +10.5% |
| 2009 | -127.04 million | +9.4% |
| 2010 | -137.21 million | +8.0% |
| 2011 | -145.28 million | +5.9% |
| 2012 | -153.84 million | +5.9% |
| 2013 | -161.39 million | +4.9% |
| 2014 | -167.50 million | +3.8% |
| 2015 | -172.19 million | +2.8% |
| 2016 | -175.65 million | +2.0% |
| 2017 | -180.76 million | +2.9% |
| 2018 | -186.43 million | +3.1% |
| 2019 | -192.11 million | +3.1% |
| 2020 | -197.74 million | +2.9% |
| 2021 | -203.43 million | +2.9% |
| 2022 | -209.21 million | +2.8% |
| 2023 | -214.94 million | +2.7% |
| 2024 | -220.63 million | +2.6% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's -220.63 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million. (64 countries reporting)
- Czechia's -220.63 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Czechia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | -939.8% | -398,464 | -4.14 million |
| 2001 | -116.5% | -13.21 million | -28.60 million |
| 1996 | -110.0% | 3.98 million | -398,464 |
| 1851 | +102.8% | 10.07 million | 20.42 million |
| 1998 | -66.2% | -4.14 million | -6.89 million |
| 1995 | -56.0% | 9.05 million | 3.98 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 57.26 million | 10.07 million | 104.70 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 165.20 million | 115.57 million | 215.25 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 272.17 million | 225.85 million | 317.51 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 360.38 million | 326.26 million | 392.14 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 438.35 million | 399.79 million | 478.33 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 532.93 million | 487.95 million | 578.71 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 601.05 million | 586.02 million | 606.95 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 609.24 million | 605.80 million | 615.28 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 584.73 million | 537.20 million | 614.84 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 447.75 million | 367.37 million | 522.48 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 310.02 million | 265.51 million | 364.11 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 230.07 million | 187.24 million | 269.60 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 138.88 million | 101.50 million | 178.13 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 64.27 million | 37.08 million | 94.16 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.07 million | -10.11 million | 31.20 million | 10 |
| 2000s | -73.40 million | -127.04 million | -13.21 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -167.23 million | -192.11 million | -137.21 million | 10 |
| 2020s | -209.19 million | -220.63 million | -197.74 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
- 192 Antigua and Barbuda -11.52 million compare
- 193 Yemen -16.93 million compare
- 194 Equatorial Guinea -96.95 million compare
- 196 Georgia -377.30 million compare
- 197 France -3.92 billion compare
More climate change data for Czechia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 222.01 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,062 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 892.87 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,169 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 113.19 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,743 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,712 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 31.31 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.46 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Czechia?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Czechia was -220.63 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 615.28 million in 1929.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was -220.63 million in 2024.
- How does Czechia rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Czechia ranks 195th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).