Cumulative co2 land use in South Africa
South Africa: Cumulative co2 land use was 7.22 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
7.22 billion
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
25th
of 197 countries
All-time high
7.22 billion
in 2024
All-time low
2.50 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in South Africa, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in South Africa is 7.22 billion, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in South Africa peaked at 7.22 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 2.50 million, in 1850.
South Africa ranks 25th of 197 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in South Africa, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 2.50 million | — |
| 1851 | 5.23 million | +109.0% |
| 1852 | 8.12 million | +55.4% |
| 1853 | 11.12 million | +36.9% |
| 1854 | 14.20 million | +27.8% |
| 1855 | 17.39 million | +22.4% |
| 1856 | 20.65 million | +18.8% |
| 1857 | 23.99 million | +16.2% |
| 1858 | 27.39 million | +14.1% |
| 1859 | 30.83 million | +12.6% |
| 1860 | 35.15 million | +14.0% |
| 1861 | 39.90 million | +13.5% |
| 1862 | 44.98 million | +12.7% |
| 1863 | 50.29 million | +11.8% |
| 1864 | 55.77 million | +10.9% |
| 1865 | 61.38 million | +10.1% |
| 1866 | 67.16 million | +9.4% |
| 1867 | 72.98 million | +8.7% |
| 1868 | 78.89 million | +8.1% |
| 1869 | 84.87 million | +7.6% |
| 1870 | 97.20 million | +14.5% |
| 1871 | 112.86 million | +16.1% |
| 1872 | 130.68 million | +15.8% |
| 1873 | 150.01 million | +14.8% |
| 1874 | 170.56 million | +13.7% |
| 1875 | 192.09 million | +12.6% |
| 1876 | 214.31 million | +11.6% |
| 1877 | 237.24 million | +10.7% |
| 1878 | 260.76 million | +9.9% |
| 1879 | 284.66 million | +9.2% |
| 1880 | 304.80 million | +7.1% |
| 1881 | 322.99 million | +6.0% |
| 1882 | 340.03 million | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 356.32 million | +4.8% |
| 1884 | 372.17 million | +4.4% |
| 1885 | 387.54 million | +4.1% |
| 1886 | 402.58 million | +3.9% |
| 1887 | 417.39 million | +3.7% |
| 1888 | 431.98 million | +3.5% |
| 1889 | 446.39 million | +3.3% |
| 1890 | 465.21 million | +4.2% |
| 1891 | 486.16 million | +4.5% |
| 1892 | 508.53 million | +4.6% |
| 1893 | 531.91 million | +4.6% |
| 1894 | 555.97 million | +4.5% |
| 1895 | 580.65 million | +4.4% |
| 1896 | 605.81 million | +4.3% |
| 1897 | 631.31 million | +4.2% |
| 1898 | 657.15 million | +4.1% |
| 1899 | 683.34 million | +4.0% |
| 1900 | 711.61 million | +4.1% |
| 1901 | 741.09 million | +4.1% |
| 1902 | 771.41 million | +4.1% |
| 1903 | 802.28 million | +4.0% |
| 1904 | 833.71 million | +3.9% |
| 1905 | 865.58 million | +3.8% |
| 1906 | 897.75 million | +3.7% |
| 1907 | 930.23 million | +3.6% |
| 1908 | 963.03 million | +3.5% |
| 1909 | 996.08 million | +3.4% |
| 1910 | 1.03 billion | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 1.06 billion | +3.2% |
| 1912 | 1.09 billion | +3.1% |
| 1913 | 1.13 billion | +3.0% |
| 1914 | 1.16 billion | +2.9% |
| 1915 | 1.19 billion | +2.8% |
| 1916 | 1.22 billion | +2.7% |
| 1917 | 1.26 billion | +2.7% |
| 1918 | 1.29 billion | +2.6% |
| 1919 | 1.32 billion | +2.5% |
| 1920 | 1.36 billion | +2.7% |
| 1921 | 1.39 billion | +2.7% |
| 1922 | 1.43 billion | +2.7% |
| 1923 | 1.47 billion | +2.7% |
| 1924 | 1.51 billion | +2.7% |
| 1925 | 1.55 billion | +2.6% |
| 1926 | 1.59 billion | +2.6% |
| 1927 | 1.63 billion | +2.5% |
| 1928 | 1.67 billion | +2.5% |
| 1929 | 1.71 billion | +2.4% |
| 1930 | 1.75 billion | +2.4% |
| 1931 | 1.79 billion | +2.4% |
| 1932 | 1.84 billion | +2.4% |
| 1933 | 1.88 billion | +2.4% |
| 1934 | 1.92 billion | +2.3% |
| 1935 | 1.97 billion | +2.3% |
| 1936 | 2.01 billion | +2.2% |
| 1937 | 2.06 billion | +2.2% |
| 1938 | 2.10 billion | +2.2% |
| 1939 | 2.15 billion | +2.1% |
| 1940 | 2.20 billion | +2.6% |
| 1941 | 2.26 billion | +2.8% |
| 1942 | 2.33 billion | +2.9% |
| 1943 | 2.40 billion | +3.0% |
| 1944 | 2.47 billion | +3.0% |
| 1945 | 2.55 billion | +3.0% |
| 1946 | 2.62 billion | +2.9% |
| 1947 | 2.70 billion | +2.9% |
| 1948 | 2.77 billion | +2.8% |
| 1949 | 2.85 billion | +2.8% |
| 1950 | 2.93 billion | +2.7% |
| 1951 | 3.01 billion | +2.8% |
| 1952 | 3.10 billion | +2.8% |
| 1953 | 3.18 billion | +2.9% |
| 1954 | 3.27 billion | +2.8% |
| 1955 | 3.36 billion | +2.8% |
| 1956 | 3.46 billion | +2.7% |
| 1957 | 3.55 billion | +2.7% |
| 1958 | 3.64 billion | +2.6% |
| 1959 | 3.74 billion | +2.6% |
| 1960 | 3.85 billion | +2.9% |
| 1961 | 3.93 billion | +2.1% |
| 1962 | 4.00 billion | +1.8% |
| 1963 | 4.07 billion | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 4.13 billion | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 4.19 billion | +1.5% |
| 1966 | 4.26 billion | +1.7% |
| 1967 | 4.33 billion | +1.8% |
| 1968 | 4.41 billion | +1.8% |
| 1969 | 4.49 billion | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 4.57 billion | +1.8% |
| 1971 | 4.65 billion | +1.7% |
| 1972 | 4.73 billion | +1.7% |
| 1973 | 4.80 billion | +1.6% |
| 1974 | 4.87 billion | +1.5% |
| 1975 | 4.95 billion | +1.5% |
| 1976 | 5.02 billion | +1.4% |
| 1977 | 5.08 billion | +1.3% |
| 1978 | 5.15 billion | +1.3% |
| 1979 | 5.21 billion | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 5.27 billion | +1.2% |
| 1981 | 5.33 billion | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 5.39 billion | +1.2% |
| 1983 | 5.46 billion | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 5.52 billion | +1.1% |
| 1985 | 5.60 billion | +1.4% |
| 1986 | 5.67 billion | +1.2% |
| 1987 | 5.74 billion | +1.3% |
| 1988 | 5.82 billion | +1.4% |
| 1989 | 5.90 billion | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 5.98 billion | +1.4% |
| 1991 | 6.07 billion | +1.5% |
| 1992 | 6.17 billion | +1.6% |
| 1993 | 6.25 billion | +1.3% |
| 1994 | 6.33 billion | +1.3% |
| 1995 | 6.41 billion | +1.3% |
| 1996 | 6.49 billion | +1.2% |
| 1997 | 6.57 billion | +1.2% |
| 1998 | 6.64 billion | +1.1% |
| 1999 | 6.71 billion | +1.1% |
| 2000 | 6.78 billion | +0.9% |
| 2001 | 6.83 billion | +0.9% |
| 2002 | 6.88 billion | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 6.93 billion | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 6.97 billion | +0.6% |
| 2005 | 7.00 billion | +0.5% |
| 2006 | 7.04 billion | +0.5% |
| 2007 | 7.09 billion | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 7.12 billion | +0.5% |
| 2009 | 7.15 billion | +0.4% |
| 2010 | 7.17 billion | +0.2% |
| 2011 | 7.18 billion | +0.1% |
| 2012 | 7.19 billion | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 7.20 billion | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 7.20 billion | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 7.20 billion | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 7.21 billion | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 7.20 billion | -0.0% |
| 2018 | 7.21 billion | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 7.21 billion | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 7.21 billion | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 7.21 billion | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 7.22 billion | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 7.22 billion | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 7.22 billion | +0.1% |
South Africa compared with similar countries
- South Africa's 7.22 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 11.5× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- South Africa's 7.22 billion is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 4.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in South Africa changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +109.0% | 2.50 million | 5.23 million |
| 1852 | +55.4% | 5.23 million | 8.12 million |
| 1853 | +36.9% | 8.12 million | 11.12 million |
| 1854 | +27.8% | 11.12 million | 14.20 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 16.14 million | 2.50 million | 30.83 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 59.14 million | 35.15 million | 84.87 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 185.04 million | 97.20 million | 284.66 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 378.22 million | 304.80 million | 446.39 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 570.60 million | 465.21 million | 683.34 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 851.28 million | 711.61 million | 996.08 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.17 billion | 1.03 billion | 1.32 billion | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.53 billion | 1.36 billion | 1.71 billion | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.95 billion | 1.75 billion | 2.15 billion | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.52 billion | 2.20 billion | 2.85 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 3.32 billion | 2.93 billion | 3.74 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 4.17 billion | 3.85 billion | 4.49 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 4.90 billion | 4.57 billion | 5.21 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.57 billion | 5.27 billion | 5.90 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.36 billion | 5.98 billion | 6.71 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.98 billion | 6.78 billion | 7.15 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.20 billion | 7.17 billion | 7.21 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.22 billion | 7.21 billion | 7.22 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
More climate change data for South Africa
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 717.27 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 34,365 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 11,741 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 22,624 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 44.31 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 807.99 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,495 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,119 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 376.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 19.32 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in South Africa?
- Cumulative co2 land use in South Africa was 7.22 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 7.22 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.50 million in 1850.
- How does South Africa rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- South Africa ranks 25th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).