Food Packaging — Energy Use in Romania

Romania: Food Packaging — Energy Use was 118.18 TJ in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
118.18 TJ
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
38th
of 65 countries
All-time high
531.26 TJ
in 2005
All-time low
3.88 TJ
in 1991
Years of data
34
1990–2023

Food Packaging — Energy Use in Romania, 1990–2023

02004006001990200620231990: 26.4 TJ1991: 3.9 TJ1992: 9.9 TJ1993: 22.6 TJ1994: 14.2 TJ1995: 7.6 TJ1996: 10.5 TJ1997: 14.2 TJ1998: 31.6 TJ1999: 43.7 TJ2000: 38.5 TJ2001: 102.2 TJ2002: 148.7 TJ2003: 196.4 TJ2004: 462 TJ2005: 531.3 TJ2006: 253.7 TJ2007: 162.4 TJ2008: 136.2 TJ2009: 110.3 TJ2010: 168.5 TJ2011: 413.1 TJ2012: 334.4 TJ2013: 306.9 TJ2014: 234.8 TJ2015: 228.8 TJ2016: 231.1 TJ2017: 245.3 TJ2018: 238.6 TJ2019: 232.7 TJ2020: 219.4 TJ2021: 216.1 TJ2022: 118.2 TJ2023: 118.2 TJ

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in TJ.

Analysis

Romania recorded 118.18 TJ for food packaging — energy use in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 61.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, food packaging — energy use in Romania peaked at 531.26 TJ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.88 TJ, in 1991.

That places Romania 38th out of 65 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Food Packaging — Energy Use in Romania, year by year

Annual values for Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal) in Romania, 1990 to 2023.
Year TJ Change
1990 26.44 TJ —
1991 3.88 TJ -85.3%
1992 9.88 TJ +154.6%
1993 22.55 TJ +128.3%
1994 14.24 TJ -36.8%
1995 7.56 TJ -46.9%
1996 10.52 TJ +39.1%
1997 14.23 TJ +35.2%
1998 31.61 TJ +122.2%
1999 43.73 TJ +38.3%
2000 38.49 TJ -12.0%
2001 102.19 TJ +165.5%
2002 148.75 TJ +45.6%
2003 196.38 TJ +32.0%
2004 461.99 TJ +135.3%
2005 531.26 TJ +15.0%
2006 253.73 TJ -52.2%
2007 162.38 TJ -36.0%
2008 136.17 TJ -16.1%
2009 110.33 TJ -19.0%
2010 168.47 TJ +52.7%
2011 413.09 TJ +145.2%
2012 334.39 TJ -19.1%
2013 306.94 TJ -8.2%
2014 234.83 TJ -23.5%
2015 228.8 TJ -2.6%
2016 231.13 TJ +1.0%
2017 245.26 TJ +6.1%
2018 238.63 TJ -2.7%
2019 232.75 TJ -2.5%
2020 219.4 TJ -5.7%
2021 216.06 TJ -1.5%
2022 118.18 TJ -45.3%
2023 118.18 TJ +0.0%

Romania compared with similar countries

  • Romania's 118.18 TJ is above the median for high income countries, which is 118.18 TJ, 1.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
  • Romania's 118.18 TJ is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 87.66 TJ, 1.3× the median. (39 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 18.46 TJ 3.88 TJ 43.73 TJ 10
2000s 214.17 TJ 38.49 TJ 531.26 TJ 10
2010s 263.43 TJ 168.47 TJ 413.09 TJ 10
2020s 167.95 TJ 118.18 TJ 219.4 TJ 4

Countries ranked near Romania

  1. 35 Serbia 149.73 TJ compare
  2. 36 Myanmar 147.31 TJ compare
  3. 37 Bosnia and Herzegovina 126.04 TJ compare
  4. 39 Peru 98.3 TJ compare
  5. 40 Belgium 87.66 TJ compare
  6. 41 Uzbekistan 86.85 TJ compare

See the full ranking of 99 places →

More climate change data for Romania

All data for Romania →

Frequently asked questions

What is food packaging — energy use in Romania?
Food packaging — energy use in Romania was 118.18 TJ in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest food packaging — energy use recorded in Romania?
The highest recorded value was 531.26 TJ in 2005.
What is the lowest food packaging — energy use recorded in Romania?
The lowest recorded value was 3.88 TJ in 1991.
How does Romania rank for food packaging — energy use?
Romania ranks 38th out of 65 countries with data for 2023.
Is food packaging — energy use rising or falling in Romania?
Over the last ten years it is down 61.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Romania data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Food Packaging — Energy Use in Romania. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/food-packaging-energy-use-coal/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/food-packaging-energy-use-coal/romania/">Food Packaging — Energy Use in Romania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Packaging — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
99 places, 2,799 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.