LULUCF — Emissions Share in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: LULUCF — Emissions Share was 0 % in 2023. ◆ Volatile
LULUCF — Emissions Share in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for lulucf — emissions share in Kazakhstan is 0 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% on the previous year.
Over the whole period, lulucf — emissions share in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.66 % in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2001.
That places Kazakhstan 96th out of 209 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2112 % | 0.03 % | 0.66 % | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.032 % | 0 % | 0.27 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.005 % | 0 % | 0.02 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 96 Afghanistan 0 % compare
- 96 Anguilla 0 % compare
- 96 Antigua and Barbuda 0 % compare
- 96 Aruba 0 % compare
- 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 % compare
- 96 Austria 0 % compare
- 96 Azerbaijan 0 % compare
- 96 Bahrain 0 % compare
- 96 Barbados 0 % compare
- 96 Belarus 0 % compare
- 96 Belgium 0 % compare
- 96 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 96 Botswana 0 % compare
- 96 British Virgin Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Bulgaria 0 % compare
- 96 Burkina Faso 0 % compare
- 96 Burundi 0 % compare
- 96 Cabo Verde 0 % compare
- 96 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 % compare
- 96 China, Macao SAR 0 % compare
- 96 China, Taiwan Province of 0 % compare
- 96 Comoros 0 % compare
- 96 Cook Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Croatia 0 % compare
- 96 Cyprus 0 % compare
- 96 Czechia 0 % compare
- 96 Denmark 0 % compare
- 96 Djibouti 0 % compare
- 96 Dominica 0 % compare
- 96 Egypt 0 % compare
- 96 Eritrea 0 % compare
- 96 Estonia 0 % compare
- 96 Finland 0 % compare
- 96 Gambia 0 % compare
- 96 Germany 0 % compare
- 96 Grenada 0 % compare
- 96 Haiti 0 % compare
- 96 Hungary 0 % compare
- 96 Iceland 0 % compare
- 96 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 % compare
- 96 Iraq 0 % compare
- 96 Ireland 0 % compare
- 96 Israel 0 % compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 % compare
- 96 Jordan 0 % compare
- 96 Kiribati 0 % compare
- 96 Kuwait 0 % compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 % compare
- 96 Latvia 0 % compare
- 96 Lebanon 0 % compare
- 96 Lesotho 0 % compare
- 96 Libya 0 % compare
- 96 Lithuania 0 % compare
- 96 Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 96 Maldives 0 % compare
- 96 Mali 0 % compare
- 96 Malta 0 % compare
- 96 Marshall Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Mauritania 0 % compare
- 96 Mauritius 0 % compare
- 96 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 % compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 % compare
- 96 Montenegro 0 % compare
- 96 Nauru 0 % compare
- 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 % compare
- 96 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 % compare
- 96 New Zealand 0 % compare
- 96 Niger 0 % compare
- 96 Niue 0 % compare
- 96 North Macedonia 0 % compare
- 96 Norway 0 % compare
- 96 Oman 0 % compare
- 96 Pakistan 0 % compare
- 96 Palau 0 % compare
- 96 Poland 0 % compare
- 96 Qatar 0 % compare
- 96 Republic of Korea 0 % compare
- 96 Republic of Moldova 0 % compare
- 96 Romania 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Lucia 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 % compare
- 96 Samoa 0 % compare
- 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 % compare
- 96 Saudi Arabia 0 % compare
- 96 Serbia 0 % compare
- 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 % compare
- 96 Seychelles 0 % compare
- 96 Singapore 0 % compare
- 96 Slovakia 0 % compare
- 96 Slovenia 0 % compare
- 96 Solomon Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Somalia 0 % compare
- 96 Sri Lanka 0 % compare
- 96 Sudan 0 % compare
- 96 Sweden 0 % compare
- 96 Switzerland 0 % compare
- 96 Tajikistan 0 % compare
- 96 Tokelau 0 % compare
- 96 Tonga 0 % compare
- 96 Trinidad and Tobago 0 % compare
- 96 Türkiye 0 % compare
- 96 Turkmenistan 0 % compare
- 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Tuvalu 0 % compare
- 96 United Arab Emirates 0 % compare
- 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 % compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 % compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 0 % compare
- 96 Vanuatu 0 % compare
- 96 Yemen 0 % compare
- 96 Micronesia 0 % compare
- 96 Polynesia 0 % compare
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 6.02 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 28.52 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is lulucf — emissions share in Kazakhstan?
- Lulucf — emissions share in Kazakhstan was 0 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest lulucf — emissions share recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.66 % in 1997.
- What is the lowest lulucf — emissions share recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2001.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for lulucf — emissions share?
- Kazakhstan ranks 96th out of 209 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.