LULUCF — Emissions Share in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: LULUCF — Emissions Share was 0 % in 2023. ◆ Volatile
LULUCF — Emissions Share in Trinidad and Tobago, 1990–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for lulucf — emissions share in Trinidad and Tobago is 0 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 34 years on record.
Over the whole period, lulucf — emissions share in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 0.16 % in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2001.
That places Trinidad and Tobago 96th out of 209 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.069 % | 0.03 % | 0.16 % | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.02 % | 0 % | 0.16 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.013 % | 0 % | 0.06 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 96 Afghanistan 0 % compare
- 96 Anguilla 0 % compare
- 96 Antigua and Barbuda 0 % compare
- 96 Aruba 0 % compare
- 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 % compare
- 96 Austria 0 % compare
- 96 Azerbaijan 0 % compare
- 96 Bahrain 0 % compare
- 96 Barbados 0 % compare
- 96 Belarus 0 % compare
- 96 Belgium 0 % compare
- 96 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 96 Botswana 0 % compare
- 96 British Virgin Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Bulgaria 0 % compare
- 96 Burkina Faso 0 % compare
- 96 Burundi 0 % compare
- 96 Cabo Verde 0 % compare
- 96 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 % compare
- 96 China, Macao SAR 0 % compare
- 96 China, Taiwan Province of 0 % compare
- 96 Comoros 0 % compare
- 96 Cook Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Croatia 0 % compare
- 96 Cyprus 0 % compare
- 96 Czechia 0 % compare
- 96 Denmark 0 % compare
- 96 Djibouti 0 % compare
- 96 Dominica 0 % compare
- 96 Egypt 0 % compare
- 96 Eritrea 0 % compare
- 96 Estonia 0 % compare
- 96 Finland 0 % compare
- 96 Gambia 0 % compare
- 96 Germany 0 % compare
- 96 Grenada 0 % compare
- 96 Haiti 0 % compare
- 96 Hungary 0 % compare
- 96 Iceland 0 % compare
- 96 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 % compare
- 96 Iraq 0 % compare
- 96 Ireland 0 % compare
- 96 Israel 0 % compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 % compare
- 96 Jordan 0 % compare
- 96 Kazakhstan 0 % compare
- 96 Kiribati 0 % compare
- 96 Kuwait 0 % compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 % compare
- 96 Latvia 0 % compare
- 96 Lebanon 0 % compare
- 96 Lesotho 0 % compare
- 96 Libya 0 % compare
- 96 Lithuania 0 % compare
- 96 Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 96 Maldives 0 % compare
- 96 Mali 0 % compare
- 96 Malta 0 % compare
- 96 Marshall Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Mauritania 0 % compare
- 96 Mauritius 0 % compare
- 96 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 % compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 % compare
- 96 Montenegro 0 % compare
- 96 Nauru 0 % compare
- 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 % compare
- 96 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 % compare
- 96 New Zealand 0 % compare
- 96 Niger 0 % compare
- 96 Niue 0 % compare
- 96 North Macedonia 0 % compare
- 96 Norway 0 % compare
- 96 Oman 0 % compare
- 96 Pakistan 0 % compare
- 96 Palau 0 % compare
- 96 Poland 0 % compare
- 96 Qatar 0 % compare
- 96 Republic of Korea 0 % compare
- 96 Republic of Moldova 0 % compare
- 96 Romania 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Lucia 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 % compare
- 96 Samoa 0 % compare
- 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 % compare
- 96 Saudi Arabia 0 % compare
- 96 Serbia 0 % compare
- 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 % compare
- 96 Seychelles 0 % compare
- 96 Singapore 0 % compare
- 96 Slovakia 0 % compare
- 96 Slovenia 0 % compare
- 96 Solomon Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Somalia 0 % compare
- 96 Sri Lanka 0 % compare
- 96 Sudan 0 % compare
- 96 Sweden 0 % compare
- 96 Switzerland 0 % compare
- 96 Tajikistan 0 % compare
- 96 Tokelau 0 % compare
- 96 Tonga 0 % compare
- 96 Türkiye 0 % compare
- 96 Turkmenistan 0 % compare
- 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Tuvalu 0 % compare
- 96 United Arab Emirates 0 % compare
- 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 % compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 % compare
- 96 Uzbekistan 0 % compare
- 96 Vanuatu 0 % compare
- 96 Yemen 0 % compare
- 96 Micronesia 0 % compare
- 96 Polynesia 0 % compare
More climate change data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 292.34 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 171.38 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 120.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.6467 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.32 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 52.15 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 39.99 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 12.16 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.1509 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.4343 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is lulucf — emissions share in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Lulucf — emissions share in Trinidad and Tobago was 0 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest lulucf — emissions share recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 0.16 % in 1998.
- What is the lowest lulucf — emissions share recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2001.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for lulucf — emissions share?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th out of 209 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.