LULUCF — Emissions Share in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: LULUCF — Emissions Share was 0 % in 2023. ◆ Volatile
LULUCF — Emissions Share in Uzbekistan, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2023, lulucf — emissions share in Uzbekistan stood at 0 %. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
Over the whole period, lulucf — emissions share in Uzbekistan peaked at 0.14 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 %, in 2001.
That places Uzbekistan 96th out of 209 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.09 % | 0.07 % | 0.11 % | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.014 % | 0 % | 0.14 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 96 Afghanistan 0 % compare
- 96 Anguilla 0 % compare
- 96 Antigua and Barbuda 0 % compare
- 96 Aruba 0 % compare
- 96 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 0 % compare
- 96 Austria 0 % compare
- 96 Azerbaijan 0 % compare
- 96 Bahrain 0 % compare
- 96 Barbados 0 % compare
- 96 Belarus 0 % compare
- 96 Belgium 0 % compare
- 96 Belgium-Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 96 Botswana 0 % compare
- 96 British Virgin Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Bulgaria 0 % compare
- 96 Burkina Faso 0 % compare
- 96 Burundi 0 % compare
- 96 Cabo Verde 0 % compare
- 96 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 % compare
- 96 China, Macao SAR 0 % compare
- 96 China, Taiwan Province of 0 % compare
- 96 Comoros 0 % compare
- 96 Cook Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Croatia 0 % compare
- 96 Cyprus 0 % compare
- 96 Czechia 0 % compare
- 96 Denmark 0 % compare
- 96 Djibouti 0 % compare
- 96 Dominica 0 % compare
- 96 Egypt 0 % compare
- 96 Eritrea 0 % compare
- 96 Estonia 0 % compare
- 96 Finland 0 % compare
- 96 Gambia 0 % compare
- 96 Germany 0 % compare
- 96 Grenada 0 % compare
- 96 Haiti 0 % compare
- 96 Hungary 0 % compare
- 96 Iceland 0 % compare
- 96 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 % compare
- 96 Iraq 0 % compare
- 96 Ireland 0 % compare
- 96 Israel 0 % compare
- 96 Jamaica 0 % compare
- 96 Jordan 0 % compare
- 96 Kazakhstan 0 % compare
- 96 Kiribati 0 % compare
- 96 Kuwait 0 % compare
- 96 Kyrgyzstan 0 % compare
- 96 Latvia 0 % compare
- 96 Lebanon 0 % compare
- 96 Lesotho 0 % compare
- 96 Libya 0 % compare
- 96 Lithuania 0 % compare
- 96 Luxembourg 0 % compare
- 96 Maldives 0 % compare
- 96 Mali 0 % compare
- 96 Malta 0 % compare
- 96 Marshall Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Mauritania 0 % compare
- 96 Mauritius 0 % compare
- 96 Micronesia (Federated States of) 0 % compare
- 96 Mongolia 0 % compare
- 96 Montenegro 0 % compare
- 96 Nauru 0 % compare
- 96 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 % compare
- 96 Netherlands Antilles (former) 0 % compare
- 96 New Zealand 0 % compare
- 96 Niger 0 % compare
- 96 Niue 0 % compare
- 96 North Macedonia 0 % compare
- 96 Norway 0 % compare
- 96 Oman 0 % compare
- 96 Pakistan 0 % compare
- 96 Palau 0 % compare
- 96 Poland 0 % compare
- 96 Qatar 0 % compare
- 96 Republic of Korea 0 % compare
- 96 Republic of Moldova 0 % compare
- 96 Romania 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Lucia 0 % compare
- 96 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 % compare
- 96 Samoa 0 % compare
- 96 Sao Tome and Principe 0 % compare
- 96 Saudi Arabia 0 % compare
- 96 Serbia 0 % compare
- 96 Serbia and Montenegro 0 % compare
- 96 Seychelles 0 % compare
- 96 Singapore 0 % compare
- 96 Slovakia 0 % compare
- 96 Slovenia 0 % compare
- 96 Solomon Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Somalia 0 % compare
- 96 Sri Lanka 0 % compare
- 96 Sudan 0 % compare
- 96 Sweden 0 % compare
- 96 Switzerland 0 % compare
- 96 Tajikistan 0 % compare
- 96 Tokelau 0 % compare
- 96 Tonga 0 % compare
- 96 Trinidad and Tobago 0 % compare
- 96 Türkiye 0 % compare
- 96 Turkmenistan 0 % compare
- 96 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 % compare
- 96 Tuvalu 0 % compare
- 96 United Arab Emirates 0 % compare
- 96 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 % compare
- 96 Uruguay 0 % compare
- 96 Vanuatu 0 % compare
- 96 Yemen 0 % compare
- 96 Micronesia 0 % compare
- 96 Polynesia 0 % compare
More climate change data for Uzbekistan
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 23,306 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO 5,291 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO 18,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 19.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 643.38 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 6,140 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 5,778 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 362.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 21.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 12.93 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is lulucf — emissions share in Uzbekistan?
- Lulucf — emissions share in Uzbekistan was 0 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest lulucf — emissions share recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.14 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest lulucf — emissions share recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 % in 2001.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for lulucf — emissions share?
- Uzbekistan ranks 96th out of 209 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of LULUCF — Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.