Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 0 kt per square kilometre for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of down 36.7% on the previous year and down 70.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2023.
Costa Rica ranks 45th of 102 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1963 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 1965 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1966 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1967 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1968 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1969 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1970 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1971 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 1972 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 1973 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +58.7% |
| 1974 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 1975 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 1976 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -15.2% |
| 1977 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 1978 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 1979 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1980 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -8.8% |
| 1981 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1982 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1983 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +27.2% |
| 1984 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1985 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1986 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1987 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1988 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +26.3% |
| 1989 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1990 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1991 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1992 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -23.4% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -36.7% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 0 kt per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 kt per square kilometre, 2.5× the median. (18 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 0 kt per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 kt per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More climate change data for Costa Rica
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 108.28 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,751 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 942.79 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,808 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.56 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 100.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 688.78 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 623.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 65.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 2.35 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
- Rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Costa Rica rank for rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre?
- Costa Rica ranks 45th out of 102 countries with data for 2023.
- Is rice — crop residues (indirect emissions n2o), per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 70.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Rice — Crop residues Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.