Total ghg emissions in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Total ghg emissions was 14.98 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Total ghg emissions in Costa Rica, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for total ghg emissions in Costa Rica is 14.98 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.0% on the previous year and down 9.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, total ghg emissions in Costa Rica peaked at 60.29 million in 1972 and was at its lowest, 2.40 million, in 1857.
That places Costa Rica 135th out of 199 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Total ghg emissions in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 2.66 million | — |
| 1851 | 2.50 million | -6.1% |
| 1852 | 2.52 million | +0.6% |
| 1853 | 2.45 million | -2.8% |
| 1854 | 2.42 million | -0.9% |
| 1855 | 2.51 million | +3.7% |
| 1856 | 2.42 million | -3.5% |
| 1857 | 2.40 million | -1.1% |
| 1858 | 2.55 million | +6.2% |
| 1859 | 2.52 million | -1.1% |
| 1860 | 3.07 million | +21.9% |
| 1861 | 3.28 million | +6.9% |
| 1862 | 3.27 million | -0.4% |
| 1863 | 3.54 million | +8.2% |
| 1864 | 3.57 million | +0.8% |
| 1865 | 3.65 million | +2.2% |
| 1866 | 3.56 million | -2.3% |
| 1867 | 3.68 million | +3.3% |
| 1868 | 3.94 million | +6.9% |
| 1869 | 4.03 million | +2.4% |
| 1870 | 4.12 million | +2.1% |
| 1871 | 4.27 million | +3.7% |
| 1872 | 4.58 million | +7.2% |
| 1873 | 4.58 million | +0.1% |
| 1874 | 4.72 million | +3.0% |
| 1875 | 4.74 million | +0.4% |
| 1876 | 4.79 million | +1.0% |
| 1877 | 4.86 million | +1.6% |
| 1878 | 4.85 million | -0.4% |
| 1879 | 4.94 million | +1.9% |
| 1880 | 4.80 million | -2.7% |
| 1881 | 5.04 million | +5.0% |
| 1882 | 4.85 million | -3.9% |
| 1883 | 4.93 million | +1.6% |
| 1884 | 4.73 million | -3.9% |
| 1885 | 4.91 million | +3.8% |
| 1886 | 4.99 million | +1.6% |
| 1887 | 4.99 million | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 5.01 million | +0.4% |
| 1889 | 4.83 million | -3.7% |
| 1890 | 5.60 million | +16.0% |
| 1891 | 6.00 million | +7.1% |
| 1892 | 6.46 million | +7.7% |
| 1893 | 6.43 million | -0.5% |
| 1894 | 6.53 million | +1.7% |
| 1895 | 6.79 million | +4.0% |
| 1896 | 6.78 million | -0.2% |
| 1897 | 6.81 million | +0.5% |
| 1898 | 7.01 million | +2.9% |
| 1899 | 7.22 million | +3.0% |
| 1900 | 7.17 million | -0.8% |
| 1901 | 7.42 million | +3.6% |
| 1902 | 7.14 million | -3.8% |
| 1903 | 7.16 million | +0.3% |
| 1904 | 8.15 million | +13.7% |
| 1905 | 7.67 million | -5.8% |
| 1906 | 8.07 million | +5.2% |
| 1907 | 7.05 million | -12.7% |
| 1908 | 7.30 million | +3.6% |
| 1909 | 8.44 million | +15.6% |
| 1910 | 7.85 million | -6.9% |
| 1911 | 9.17 million | +16.7% |
| 1912 | 7.57 million | -17.4% |
| 1913 | 8.34 million | +10.2% |
| 1914 | 8.99 million | +7.8% |
| 1915 | 8.36 million | -7.0% |
| 1916 | 8.38 million | +0.2% |
| 1917 | 8.64 million | +3.1% |
| 1918 | 9.36 million | +8.3% |
| 1919 | 8.53 million | -8.9% |
| 1920 | 8.93 million | +4.7% |
| 1921 | 7.55 million | -15.5% |
| 1922 | 7.64 million | +1.2% |
| 1923 | 6.97 million | -8.8% |
| 1924 | 7.04 million | +1.1% |
| 1925 | 7.68 million | +9.1% |
| 1926 | 6.90 million | -10.1% |
| 1927 | 7.69 million | +11.3% |
| 1928 | 7.60 million | -1.0% |
| 1929 | 7.55 million | -0.8% |
| 1930 | 9.68 million | +28.2% |
| 1931 | 11.74 million | +21.3% |
| 1932 | 15.47 million | +31.8% |
| 1933 | 13.49 million | -12.9% |
| 1934 | 14.62 million | +8.4% |
| 1935 | 17.71 million | +21.2% |
| 1936 | 17.43 million | -1.6% |
| 1937 | 15.55 million | -10.8% |
| 1938 | 19.47 million | +25.2% |
| 1939 | 17.77 million | -8.7% |
| 1940 | 22.09 million | +24.3% |
| 1941 | 26.38 million | +19.4% |
| 1942 | 26.22 million | -0.6% |
| 1943 | 27.10 million | +3.4% |
| 1944 | 26.71 million | -1.4% |
| 1945 | 24.78 million | -7.2% |
| 1946 | 28.30 million | +14.2% |
| 1947 | 26.61 million | -6.0% |
| 1948 | 25.56 million | -3.9% |
| 1949 | 27.28 million | +6.7% |
| 1950 | 27.61 million | +1.2% |
| 1951 | 25.77 million | -6.7% |
| 1952 | 25.95 million | +0.7% |
| 1953 | 28.91 million | +11.4% |
| 1954 | 30.06 million | +4.0% |
| 1955 | 32.02 million | +6.5% |
| 1956 | 32.63 million | +1.9% |
| 1957 | 34.82 million | +6.7% |
| 1958 | 35.23 million | +1.2% |
| 1959 | 42.52 million | +20.7% |
| 1960 | 26.20 million | -38.4% |
| 1961 | 24.73 million | -5.6% |
| 1962 | 21.53 million | -12.9% |
| 1963 | 31.31 million | +45.4% |
| 1964 | 35.63 million | +13.8% |
| 1965 | 40.17 million | +12.7% |
| 1966 | 25.13 million | -37.4% |
| 1967 | 38.05 million | +51.4% |
| 1968 | 40.35 million | +6.1% |
| 1969 | 41.10 million | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 33.44 million | -18.6% |
| 1971 | 24.49 million | -26.7% |
| 1972 | 60.29 million | +146.1% |
| 1973 | 31.78 million | -47.3% |
| 1974 | 44.08 million | +38.7% |
| 1975 | 48.91 million | +10.9% |
| 1976 | 52.99 million | +8.3% |
| 1977 | 51.82 million | -2.2% |
| 1978 | 56.34 million | +8.7% |
| 1979 | 58.47 million | +3.8% |
| 1980 | 55.23 million | -5.5% |
| 1981 | 57.62 million | +4.3% |
| 1982 | 32.62 million | -43.4% |
| 1983 | 47.95 million | +47.0% |
| 1984 | 27.18 million | -43.3% |
| 1985 | 22.54 million | -17.1% |
| 1986 | 19.97 million | -11.4% |
| 1987 | 18.56 million | -7.0% |
| 1988 | 14.79 million | -20.3% |
| 1989 | 12.86 million | -13.1% |
| 1990 | 14.98 million | +16.5% |
| 1991 | 13.14 million | -12.3% |
| 1992 | 13.07 million | -0.5% |
| 1993 | 14.35 million | +9.8% |
| 1994 | 19.87 million | +38.5% |
| 1995 | 15.80 million | -20.5% |
| 1996 | 15.44 million | -2.3% |
| 1997 | 13.28 million | -14.0% |
| 1998 | 13.60 million | +2.4% |
| 1999 | 13.48 million | -0.9% |
| 2000 | 15.36 million | +13.9% |
| 2001 | 15.53 million | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 17.83 million | +14.8% |
| 2003 | 17.09 million | -4.2% |
| 2004 | 12.81 million | -25.0% |
| 2005 | 13.06 million | +1.9% |
| 2006 | 13.98 million | +7.1% |
| 2007 | 16.29 million | +16.5% |
| 2008 | 19.49 million | +19.6% |
| 2009 | 19.72 million | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 18.18 million | -7.8% |
| 2011 | 16.35 million | -10.1% |
| 2012 | 16.73 million | +2.3% |
| 2013 | 17.65 million | +5.5% |
| 2014 | 16.58 million | -6.1% |
| 2015 | 18.32 million | +10.5% |
| 2016 | 17.69 million | -3.4% |
| 2017 | 18.00 million | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 16.28 million | -9.6% |
| 2019 | 16.02 million | -1.6% |
| 2020 | 14.32 million | -10.6% |
| 2021 | 14.04 million | -1.9% |
| 2022 | 13.89 million | -1.1% |
| 2023 | 14.83 million | +6.8% |
| 2024 | 14.98 million | +1.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 14.98 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 47.51 million, 32% of the median. (67 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 14.98 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.07 million, 83% of the median. (36 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Total ghg emissions in Costa Rica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1972 | +146.1% | 24.49 million | 60.29 million |
| 1967 | +51.4% | 25.13 million | 38.05 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.50 million | 2.40 million | 2.66 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 3.56 million | 3.07 million | 4.03 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 4.64 million | 4.12 million | 4.94 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 4.91 million | 4.73 million | 5.04 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 6.56 million | 5.60 million | 7.22 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 7.56 million | 7.05 million | 8.44 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 8.52 million | 7.57 million | 9.36 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.56 million | 6.90 million | 8.93 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 15.29 million | 9.68 million | 19.47 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 26.10 million | 22.09 million | 28.30 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 31.55 million | 25.77 million | 42.52 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 32.42 million | 21.53 million | 41.10 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 46.26 million | 24.49 million | 60.29 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 30.93 million | 12.86 million | 57.62 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.70 million | 13.07 million | 19.87 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 16.12 million | 12.81 million | 19.72 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 17.18 million | 16.02 million | 18.32 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.41 million | 13.89 million | 14.98 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More climate change data for Costa Rica
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 108.28 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,751 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 942.79 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,808 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.56 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 100.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 688.78 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 623.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 65.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 2.35 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is total ghg emissions in Costa Rica?
- Total ghg emissions in Costa Rica was 14.98 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest total ghg emissions recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 60.29 million in 1972.
- What is the lowest total ghg emissions recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.40 million in 1857.
- How does Costa Rica rank for total ghg emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 135th out of 199 countries with data for 2024.
- Is total ghg emissions rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Total ghg emissions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).