Armenia vs Congo: Food Processing — Emissions
Food Processing — Emissions over time
- Armenia
- Congo
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.0005 kt against 0.0004 kt in Congo, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Congo ahead.
Armenia ranks 87th and Congo ranks 89th of 103 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0001 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0 kt | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — emissions, Armenia or Congo?
- Armenia, at 0.0005 kt against 0.0004 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — emissions between Armenia and Congo?
- 0.0001 kt, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Congo?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Congo rank globally for food processing — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 87th and Congo ranks 89th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf