CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 2.22 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) stood at 2.22 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of down 6.5% on the previous year and down 17.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) peaked at 2.97 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.22 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 39th of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | -5.6% |
| 2007 | 2.77 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2009 | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | -2.7% |
| 2013 | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 2.73 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2015 | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | -1.8% |
| 2016 | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2017 | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | -3.8% |
| 2018 | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2021 | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 2.38 1=low to 6=high | -12.0% |
| 2023 | 2.35 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2024 | 2.38 1=low to 6=high | +1.1% |
| 2025 | 2.22 1=low to 6=high | -6.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.82 1=low to 6=high | 2.75 1=low to 6=high | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.69 1=low to 6=high | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.45 1=low to 6=high | 2.22 1=low to 6=high | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- 36 Azerbaijan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Ethiopia 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Kiribati 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Kyrgyzstan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Maldives 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Tajikistan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Vanuatu 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
- Urban population 393.80 million (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 1.64 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 2.07 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.5261 units per person (2025)
- Urban population 52.6% (2025)
- Urban population growth 2.0% (2025)
- Population, total 748.49 million (2025)
- Population growth 1.6% (2025)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) was 2.22 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- The highest recorded value was 2.97 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.22 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 39th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.