Cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Cumulative co2 land use was 862.50 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Afghanistan recorded 862.50 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
That represents a change of up 2.2% on the previous year and up 9.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan peaked at 862.50 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 2.83 million, in 1850.
That places Afghanistan 95th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 2.83 million | — |
| 1851 | 5.68 million | +100.8% |
| 1852 | 8.54 million | +50.5% |
| 1853 | 11.43 million | +33.8% |
| 1854 | 14.33 million | +25.4% |
| 1855 | 17.24 million | +20.3% |
| 1856 | 20.17 million | +17.0% |
| 1857 | 23.10 million | +14.6% |
| 1858 | 26.05 million | +12.7% |
| 1859 | 29.00 million | +11.3% |
| 1860 | 31.99 million | +10.3% |
| 1861 | 35.00 million | +9.4% |
| 1862 | 38.01 million | +8.6% |
| 1863 | 41.03 million | +7.9% |
| 1864 | 44.05 million | +7.4% |
| 1865 | 47.08 million | +6.9% |
| 1866 | 50.12 million | +6.4% |
| 1867 | 53.15 million | +6.1% |
| 1868 | 56.20 million | +5.7% |
| 1869 | 59.25 million | +5.4% |
| 1870 | 62.58 million | +5.6% |
| 1871 | 66.10 million | +5.6% |
| 1872 | 69.75 million | +5.5% |
| 1873 | 73.50 million | +5.4% |
| 1874 | 77.32 million | +5.2% |
| 1875 | 81.20 million | +5.0% |
| 1876 | 85.13 million | +4.8% |
| 1877 | 89.10 million | +4.7% |
| 1878 | 93.11 million | +4.5% |
| 1879 | 97.15 million | +4.3% |
| 1880 | 101.47 million | +4.4% |
| 1881 | 105.99 million | +4.5% |
| 1882 | 110.65 million | +4.4% |
| 1883 | 115.42 million | +4.3% |
| 1884 | 120.28 million | +4.2% |
| 1885 | 125.21 million | +4.1% |
| 1886 | 130.20 million | +4.0% |
| 1887 | 135.24 million | +3.9% |
| 1888 | 140.32 million | +3.8% |
| 1889 | 145.45 million | +3.7% |
| 1890 | 150.67 million | +3.6% |
| 1891 | 155.97 million | +3.5% |
| 1892 | 161.31 million | +3.4% |
| 1893 | 166.71 million | +3.3% |
| 1894 | 172.14 million | +3.3% |
| 1895 | 177.61 million | +3.2% |
| 1896 | 183.12 million | +3.1% |
| 1897 | 188.66 million | +3.0% |
| 1898 | 194.22 million | +2.9% |
| 1899 | 199.81 million | +2.9% |
| 1900 | 205.49 million | +2.8% |
| 1901 | 211.21 million | +2.8% |
| 1902 | 216.96 million | +2.7% |
| 1903 | 222.75 million | +2.7% |
| 1904 | 228.55 million | +2.6% |
| 1905 | 234.38 million | +2.5% |
| 1906 | 240.22 million | +2.5% |
| 1907 | 246.08 million | +2.4% |
| 1908 | 251.95 million | +2.4% |
| 1909 | 257.83 million | +2.3% |
| 1910 | 263.84 million | +2.3% |
| 1911 | 269.95 million | +2.3% |
| 1912 | 276.14 million | +2.3% |
| 1913 | 282.38 million | +2.3% |
| 1914 | 288.67 million | +2.2% |
| 1915 | 295.00 million | +2.2% |
| 1916 | 301.37 million | +2.2% |
| 1917 | 307.76 million | +2.1% |
| 1918 | 314.17 million | +2.1% |
| 1919 | 320.61 million | +2.1% |
| 1920 | 326.94 million | +2.0% |
| 1921 | 333.19 million | +1.9% |
| 1922 | 339.41 million | +1.9% |
| 1923 | 345.60 million | +1.8% |
| 1924 | 351.78 million | +1.8% |
| 1925 | 357.96 million | +1.8% |
| 1926 | 364.12 million | +1.7% |
| 1927 | 370.29 million | +1.7% |
| 1928 | 376.45 million | +1.7% |
| 1929 | 382.61 million | +1.6% |
| 1930 | 388.60 million | +1.6% |
| 1931 | 394.51 million | +1.5% |
| 1932 | 400.36 million | +1.5% |
| 1933 | 406.19 million | +1.5% |
| 1934 | 411.98 million | +1.4% |
| 1935 | 417.75 million | +1.4% |
| 1936 | 423.50 million | +1.4% |
| 1937 | 429.25 million | +1.4% |
| 1938 | 434.98 million | +1.3% |
| 1939 | 440.70 million | +1.3% |
| 1940 | 446.49 million | +1.3% |
| 1941 | 452.31 million | +1.3% |
| 1942 | 458.14 million | +1.3% |
| 1943 | 463.99 million | +1.3% |
| 1944 | 469.84 million | +1.3% |
| 1945 | 475.70 million | +1.2% |
| 1946 | 481.56 million | +1.2% |
| 1947 | 487.44 million | +1.2% |
| 1948 | 493.43 million | +1.2% |
| 1949 | 499.53 million | +1.2% |
| 1950 | 506.62 million | +1.4% |
| 1951 | 514.62 million | +1.6% |
| 1952 | 523.53 million | +1.7% |
| 1953 | 533.49 million | +1.9% |
| 1954 | 544.32 million | +2.0% |
| 1955 | 556.19 million | +2.2% |
| 1956 | 568.96 million | +2.3% |
| 1957 | 582.66 million | +2.4% |
| 1958 | 597.38 million | +2.5% |
| 1959 | 612.75 million | +2.6% |
| 1960 | 629.96 million | +2.8% |
| 1961 | 644.57 million | +2.3% |
| 1962 | 657.78 million | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 670.43 million | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 680.35 million | +1.5% |
| 1965 | 690.63 million | +1.5% |
| 1966 | 699.70 million | +1.3% |
| 1967 | 707.03 million | +1.0% |
| 1968 | 713.88 million | +1.0% |
| 1969 | 720.11 million | +0.9% |
| 1970 | 726.55 million | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 732.24 million | +0.8% |
| 1972 | 737.39 million | +0.7% |
| 1973 | 741.76 million | +0.6% |
| 1974 | 745.70 million | +0.5% |
| 1975 | 749.29 million | +0.5% |
| 1976 | 752.58 million | +0.4% |
| 1977 | 755.57 million | +0.4% |
| 1978 | 758.20 million | +0.3% |
| 1979 | 760.95 million | +0.4% |
| 1980 | 763.54 million | +0.3% |
| 1981 | 766.24 million | +0.4% |
| 1982 | 768.41 million | +0.3% |
| 1983 | 770.53 million | +0.3% |
| 1984 | 772.39 million | +0.2% |
| 1985 | 773.96 million | +0.2% |
| 1986 | 775.24 million | +0.2% |
| 1987 | 776.26 million | +0.1% |
| 1988 | 777.27 million | +0.1% |
| 1989 | 778.19 million | +0.1% |
| 1990 | 778.37 million | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 778.39 million | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 776.73 million | -0.2% |
| 1993 | 772.66 million | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 769.24 million | -0.4% |
| 1995 | 766.85 million | -0.3% |
| 1996 | 766.98 million | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 770.85 million | +0.5% |
| 1998 | 770.64 million | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 771.49 million | +0.1% |
| 2000 | 771.56 million | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 772.42 million | +0.1% |
| 2002 | 777.48 million | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 782.09 million | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 784.48 million | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 785.58 million | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 786.66 million | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 787.56 million | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 788.28 million | +0.1% |
| 2009 | 788.90 million | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 789.13 million | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 789.34 million | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 789.54 million | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 789.60 million | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 789.68 million | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 789.99 million | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 790.33 million | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 795.58 million | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 798.46 million | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 808.12 million | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 813.72 million | +0.7% |
| 2021 | 817.21 million | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 828.58 million | +1.4% |
| 2023 | 844.25 million | +1.9% |
| 2024 | 862.50 million | +2.2% |
Afghanistan compared with similar countries
- Afghanistan's 862.50 million is below the median for low income countries, which is 1.53 billion, 56% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Afghanistan's 862.50 million is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 84.69 million, 10.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +100.8% | 2.83 million | 5.68 million |
| 1852 | +50.5% | 5.68 million | 8.54 million |
| 1853 | +33.8% | 8.54 million | 11.43 million |
| 1854 | +25.4% | 11.43 million | 14.33 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 15.84 million | 2.83 million | 29.00 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 45.59 million | 31.99 million | 59.25 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 79.49 million | 62.58 million | 97.15 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 123.02 million | 101.47 million | 145.45 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 175.02 million | 150.67 million | 199.81 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 231.54 million | 205.49 million | 257.83 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 291.99 million | 263.84 million | 320.61 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 354.84 million | 326.94 million | 382.61 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 414.78 million | 388.60 million | 440.70 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 472.84 million | 446.49 million | 499.53 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 554.05 million | 506.62 million | 612.75 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 681.44 million | 629.96 million | 720.11 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 746.02 million | 726.55 million | 760.95 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 772.20 million | 763.54 million | 778.19 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 772.22 million | 766.85 million | 778.39 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 782.50 million | 771.56 million | 788.90 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 792.98 million | 789.13 million | 808.12 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 833.25 million | 813.72 million | 862.50 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
More climate change data for Afghanistan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 79.22 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 23,854 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,965 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 17,889 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 22.51 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 638.89 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,090 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,255 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.11 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Afghanistan was 862.50 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 862.50 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.83 million in 1850.
- How does Afghanistan rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Afghanistan ranks 95th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Afghanistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).