Cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador
El Salvador: Cumulative co2 land use was 658.96 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador is 658.96 million, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador peaked at 658.96 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 3.13 million, in 1850.
That places El Salvador 98th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 3.13 million | — |
| 1851 | 6.22 million | +98.5% |
| 1852 | 10.24 million | +64.7% |
| 1853 | 14.28 million | +39.5% |
| 1854 | 17.66 million | +23.7% |
| 1855 | 20.65 million | +16.9% |
| 1856 | 23.60 million | +14.3% |
| 1857 | 26.46 million | +12.1% |
| 1858 | 29.88 million | +12.9% |
| 1859 | 34.31 million | +14.8% |
| 1860 | 37.66 million | +9.8% |
| 1861 | 39.93 million | +6.0% |
| 1862 | 43.27 million | +8.4% |
| 1863 | 45.60 million | +5.4% |
| 1864 | 48.32 million | +6.0% |
| 1865 | 50.74 million | +5.0% |
| 1866 | 53.31 million | +5.1% |
| 1867 | 56.52 million | +6.0% |
| 1868 | 59.24 million | +4.8% |
| 1869 | 62.08 million | +4.8% |
| 1870 | 65.22 million | +5.1% |
| 1871 | 68.14 million | +4.5% |
| 1872 | 71.63 million | +5.1% |
| 1873 | 74.61 million | +4.2% |
| 1874 | 78.63 million | +5.4% |
| 1875 | 83.14 million | +5.7% |
| 1876 | 86.41 million | +3.9% |
| 1877 | 89.52 million | +3.6% |
| 1878 | 92.69 million | +3.5% |
| 1879 | 96.11 million | +3.7% |
| 1880 | 99.17 million | +3.2% |
| 1881 | 102.46 million | +3.3% |
| 1882 | 106.36 million | +3.8% |
| 1883 | 109.48 million | +2.9% |
| 1884 | 112.28 million | +2.6% |
| 1885 | 115.75 million | +3.1% |
| 1886 | 118.40 million | +2.3% |
| 1887 | 121.56 million | +2.7% |
| 1888 | 126.10 million | +3.7% |
| 1889 | 129.07 million | +2.4% |
| 1890 | 131.55 million | +1.9% |
| 1891 | 134.01 million | +1.9% |
| 1892 | 136.73 million | +2.0% |
| 1893 | 139.72 million | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 141.98 million | +1.6% |
| 1895 | 144.59 million | +1.8% |
| 1896 | 146.87 million | +1.6% |
| 1897 | 148.87 million | +1.4% |
| 1898 | 151.79 million | +2.0% |
| 1899 | 153.99 million | +1.4% |
| 1900 | 157.10 million | +2.0% |
| 1901 | 162.03 million | +3.1% |
| 1902 | 167.57 million | +3.4% |
| 1903 | 173.50 million | +3.5% |
| 1904 | 178.81 million | +3.1% |
| 1905 | 185.26 million | +3.6% |
| 1906 | 192.18 million | +3.7% |
| 1907 | 198.22 million | +3.1% |
| 1908 | 205.26 million | +3.6% |
| 1909 | 211.74 million | +3.2% |
| 1910 | 217.98 million | +3.0% |
| 1911 | 229.00 million | +5.1% |
| 1912 | 237.60 million | +3.8% |
| 1913 | 247.77 million | +4.3% |
| 1914 | 259.03 million | +4.5% |
| 1915 | 268.03 million | +3.5% |
| 1916 | 278.66 million | +4.0% |
| 1917 | 287.78 million | +3.3% |
| 1918 | 298.09 million | +3.6% |
| 1919 | 307.62 million | +3.2% |
| 1920 | 315.27 million | +2.5% |
| 1921 | 320.49 million | +1.7% |
| 1922 | 324.55 million | +1.3% |
| 1923 | 327.90 million | +1.0% |
| 1924 | 330.81 million | +0.9% |
| 1925 | 333.59 million | +0.8% |
| 1926 | 335.91 million | +0.7% |
| 1927 | 337.97 million | +0.6% |
| 1928 | 339.91 million | +0.6% |
| 1929 | 341.63 million | +0.5% |
| 1930 | 344.05 million | +0.7% |
| 1931 | 346.83 million | +0.8% |
| 1932 | 351.29 million | +1.3% |
| 1933 | 354.90 million | +1.0% |
| 1934 | 359.59 million | +1.3% |
| 1935 | 363.94 million | +1.2% |
| 1936 | 368.02 million | +1.1% |
| 1937 | 372.19 million | +1.1% |
| 1938 | 376.46 million | +1.1% |
| 1939 | 380.78 million | +1.1% |
| 1940 | 385.08 million | +1.1% |
| 1941 | 389.48 million | +1.1% |
| 1942 | 393.90 million | +1.1% |
| 1943 | 398.82 million | +1.3% |
| 1944 | 403.40 million | +1.1% |
| 1945 | 407.80 million | +1.1% |
| 1946 | 412.27 million | +1.1% |
| 1947 | 417.33 million | +1.2% |
| 1948 | 422.06 million | +1.1% |
| 1949 | 426.60 million | +1.1% |
| 1950 | 431.17 million | +1.1% |
| 1951 | 435.76 million | +1.1% |
| 1952 | 440.35 million | +1.1% |
| 1953 | 445.44 million | +1.2% |
| 1954 | 450.25 million | +1.1% |
| 1955 | 455.15 million | +1.1% |
| 1956 | 460.02 million | +1.1% |
| 1957 | 465.09 million | +1.1% |
| 1958 | 470.16 million | +1.1% |
| 1959 | 476.31 million | +1.3% |
| 1960 | 480.85 million | +1.0% |
| 1961 | 485.15 million | +0.9% |
| 1962 | 489.57 million | +0.9% |
| 1963 | 493.43 million | +0.8% |
| 1964 | 496.87 million | +0.7% |
| 1965 | 500.01 million | +0.6% |
| 1966 | 502.93 million | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 505.29 million | +0.5% |
| 1968 | 507.36 million | +0.4% |
| 1969 | 509.29 million | +0.4% |
| 1970 | 513.93 million | +0.9% |
| 1971 | 517.49 million | +0.7% |
| 1972 | 520.50 million | +0.6% |
| 1973 | 523.21 million | +0.5% |
| 1974 | 526.75 million | +0.7% |
| 1975 | 530.97 million | +0.8% |
| 1976 | 536.07 million | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 543.72 million | +1.4% |
| 1978 | 553.53 million | +1.8% |
| 1979 | 562.29 million | +1.6% |
| 1980 | 567.41 million | +0.9% |
| 1981 | 570.97 million | +0.6% |
| 1982 | 574.03 million | +0.5% |
| 1983 | 579.97 million | +1.0% |
| 1984 | 584.00 million | +0.7% |
| 1985 | 588.45 million | +0.8% |
| 1986 | 592.04 million | +0.6% |
| 1987 | 598.17 million | +1.0% |
| 1988 | 601.87 million | +0.6% |
| 1989 | 605.72 million | +0.6% |
| 1990 | 610.10 million | +0.7% |
| 1991 | 615.79 million | +0.9% |
| 1992 | 621.04 million | +0.9% |
| 1993 | 624.70 million | +0.6% |
| 1994 | 628.04 million | +0.5% |
| 1995 | 630.41 million | +0.4% |
| 1996 | 632.70 million | +0.4% |
| 1997 | 637.57 million | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 643.20 million | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 646.75 million | +0.6% |
| 2000 | 650.18 million | +0.5% |
| 2001 | 652.87 million | +0.4% |
| 2002 | 654.36 million | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 656.58 million | +0.3% |
| 2004 | 656.17 million | -0.1% |
| 2005 | 655.47 million | -0.1% |
| 2006 | 656.74 million | +0.2% |
| 2007 | 657.21 million | +0.1% |
| 2008 | 657.46 million | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 657.50 million | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 657.57 million | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 657.50 million | -0.0% |
| 2012 | 657.45 million | -0.0% |
| 2013 | 656.90 million | -0.1% |
| 2014 | 657.27 million | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 657.33 million | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 657.40 million | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 657.62 million | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 657.86 million | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 658.12 million | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 658.28 million | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 658.38 million | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 658.58 million | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 658.76 million | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 658.96 million | +0.0% |
El Salvador compared with similar countries
- El Salvador's 658.96 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 1.0× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- El Salvador's 658.96 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 40% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +98.5% | 3.13 million | 6.22 million |
| 1852 | +64.7% | 6.22 million | 10.24 million |
| 1853 | +39.5% | 10.24 million | 14.28 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 18.64 million | 3.13 million | 34.31 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 49.66 million | 37.66 million | 62.08 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 80.61 million | 65.22 million | 96.11 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 114.06 million | 99.17 million | 129.07 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 143.01 million | 131.55 million | 153.99 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 183.17 million | 157.10 million | 211.74 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 263.15 million | 217.98 million | 307.62 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 330.80 million | 315.27 million | 341.63 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 361.81 million | 344.05 million | 380.78 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 405.67 million | 385.08 million | 426.60 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 452.97 million | 431.17 million | 476.31 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 497.07 million | 480.85 million | 509.29 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 532.85 million | 513.93 million | 562.29 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 586.26 million | 567.41 million | 605.72 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 629.03 million | 610.10 million | 646.75 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 655.45 million | 650.18 million | 657.50 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 657.50 million | 656.90 million | 658.12 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 658.59 million | 658.28 million | 658.96 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
- 95 Afghanistan 862.50 million compare
- 96 Senegal 811.34 million compare
- 97 Haiti 768.55 million compare
- 99 Iraq 644.60 million compare
- 100 Azerbaijan 613.94 million compare
- 101 Bosnia and Herzegovina 593.99 million compare
More climate change data for El Salvador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 155.61 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,408 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,253 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 4,155 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 148.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,045 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 999.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 45.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.77 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador?
- Cumulative co2 land use in El Salvador was 658.96 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 658.96 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.13 million in 1850.
- How does El Salvador rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- El Salvador ranks 98th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).