Cumulative co2 land use in Haiti
Haiti: Cumulative co2 land use was 768.55 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cumulative co2 land use in Haiti, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Haiti recorded 768.55 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.5% on the previous year and down 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Haiti peaked at 791.07 million in 2017 and was at its lowest, 1.73 million, in 1850.
That places Haiti 97th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Haiti, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 1.73 million | — |
| 1851 | 3.66 million | +112.1% |
| 1852 | 5.58 million | +52.3% |
| 1853 | 7.61 million | +36.5% |
| 1854 | 9.68 million | +27.2% |
| 1855 | 11.79 million | +21.9% |
| 1856 | 13.79 million | +16.9% |
| 1857 | 16.08 million | +16.6% |
| 1858 | 18.41 million | +14.5% |
| 1859 | 20.60 million | +11.9% |
| 1860 | 22.62 million | +9.8% |
| 1861 | 24.54 million | +8.5% |
| 1862 | 26.81 million | +9.3% |
| 1863 | 28.89 million | +7.7% |
| 1864 | 31.16 million | +7.9% |
| 1865 | 33.26 million | +6.7% |
| 1866 | 35.72 million | +7.4% |
| 1867 | 37.94 million | +6.2% |
| 1868 | 39.97 million | +5.3% |
| 1869 | 42.10 million | +5.4% |
| 1870 | 44.13 million | +4.8% |
| 1871 | 46.02 million | +4.3% |
| 1872 | 47.61 million | +3.5% |
| 1873 | 49.38 million | +3.7% |
| 1874 | 50.96 million | +3.2% |
| 1875 | 52.74 million | +3.5% |
| 1876 | 54.32 million | +3.0% |
| 1877 | 55.80 million | +2.7% |
| 1878 | 57.61 million | +3.2% |
| 1879 | 59.14 million | +2.7% |
| 1880 | 61.65 million | +4.2% |
| 1881 | 64.35 million | +4.4% |
| 1882 | 67.35 million | +4.7% |
| 1883 | 70.21 million | +4.2% |
| 1884 | 73.17 million | +4.2% |
| 1885 | 76.73 million | +4.9% |
| 1886 | 79.94 million | +4.2% |
| 1887 | 83.49 million | +4.4% |
| 1888 | 86.85 million | +4.0% |
| 1889 | 90.22 million | +3.9% |
| 1890 | 94.17 million | +4.4% |
| 1891 | 98.08 million | +4.2% |
| 1892 | 101.96 million | +4.0% |
| 1893 | 105.36 million | +3.3% |
| 1894 | 109.18 million | +3.6% |
| 1895 | 112.80 million | +3.3% |
| 1896 | 116.75 million | +3.5% |
| 1897 | 120.29 million | +3.0% |
| 1898 | 124.05 million | +3.1% |
| 1899 | 127.72 million | +3.0% |
| 1900 | 132.25 million | +3.5% |
| 1901 | 136.71 million | +3.4% |
| 1902 | 141.21 million | +3.3% |
| 1903 | 145.78 million | +3.2% |
| 1904 | 150.69 million | +3.4% |
| 1905 | 155.37 million | +3.1% |
| 1906 | 160.22 million | +3.1% |
| 1907 | 164.96 million | +3.0% |
| 1908 | 170.21 million | +3.2% |
| 1909 | 175.25 million | +3.0% |
| 1910 | 180.49 million | +3.0% |
| 1911 | 185.72 million | +2.9% |
| 1912 | 191.34 million | +3.0% |
| 1913 | 197.27 million | +3.1% |
| 1914 | 203.00 million | +2.9% |
| 1915 | 208.79 million | +2.9% |
| 1916 | 215.14 million | +3.0% |
| 1917 | 221.27 million | +2.8% |
| 1918 | 227.26 million | +2.7% |
| 1919 | 233.80 million | +2.9% |
| 1920 | 239.81 million | +2.6% |
| 1921 | 246.09 million | +2.6% |
| 1922 | 252.39 million | +2.6% |
| 1923 | 258.77 million | +2.5% |
| 1924 | 264.80 million | +2.3% |
| 1925 | 270.86 million | +2.3% |
| 1926 | 276.92 million | +2.2% |
| 1927 | 283.04 million | +2.2% |
| 1928 | 289.00 million | +2.1% |
| 1929 | 295.07 million | +2.1% |
| 1930 | 300.98 million | +2.0% |
| 1931 | 307.61 million | +2.2% |
| 1932 | 313.88 million | +2.0% |
| 1933 | 320.34 million | +2.1% |
| 1934 | 327.35 million | +2.2% |
| 1935 | 333.69 million | +1.9% |
| 1936 | 340.04 million | +1.9% |
| 1937 | 346.36 million | +1.9% |
| 1938 | 352.93 million | +1.9% |
| 1939 | 359.21 million | +1.8% |
| 1940 | 366.38 million | +2.0% |
| 1941 | 373.50 million | +1.9% |
| 1942 | 381.11 million | +2.0% |
| 1943 | 388.64 million | +2.0% |
| 1944 | 396.02 million | +1.9% |
| 1945 | 403.27 million | +1.8% |
| 1946 | 410.60 million | +1.8% |
| 1947 | 417.94 million | +1.8% |
| 1948 | 425.29 million | +1.8% |
| 1949 | 432.63 million | +1.7% |
| 1950 | 440.11 million | +1.7% |
| 1951 | 447.83 million | +1.8% |
| 1952 | 455.62 million | +1.7% |
| 1953 | 463.44 million | +1.7% |
| 1954 | 471.93 million | +1.8% |
| 1955 | 480.44 million | +1.8% |
| 1956 | 489.12 million | +1.8% |
| 1957 | 497.94 million | +1.8% |
| 1958 | 506.93 million | +1.8% |
| 1959 | 518.38 million | +2.3% |
| 1960 | 525.32 million | +1.3% |
| 1961 | 531.43 million | +1.2% |
| 1962 | 536.89 million | +1.0% |
| 1963 | 541.90 million | +0.9% |
| 1964 | 546.58 million | +0.9% |
| 1965 | 551.10 million | +0.8% |
| 1966 | 555.41 million | +0.8% |
| 1967 | 559.58 million | +0.8% |
| 1968 | 563.77 million | +0.7% |
| 1969 | 567.77 million | +0.7% |
| 1970 | 571.67 million | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 571.40 million | -0.0% |
| 1972 | 571.01 million | -0.1% |
| 1973 | 570.84 million | -0.0% |
| 1974 | 570.89 million | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 571.43 million | +0.1% |
| 1976 | 571.79 million | +0.1% |
| 1977 | 573.52 million | +0.3% |
| 1978 | 574.45 million | +0.2% |
| 1979 | 575.76 million | +0.2% |
| 1980 | 576.54 million | +0.1% |
| 1981 | 577.15 million | +0.1% |
| 1982 | 577.69 million | +0.1% |
| 1983 | 578.24 million | +0.1% |
| 1984 | 578.80 million | +0.1% |
| 1985 | 579.41 million | +0.1% |
| 1986 | 580.05 million | +0.1% |
| 1987 | 580.73 million | +0.1% |
| 1988 | 581.50 million | +0.1% |
| 1989 | 582.18 million | +0.1% |
| 1990 | 582.91 million | +0.1% |
| 1991 | 582.99 million | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 583.72 million | +0.1% |
| 1993 | 586.74 million | +0.5% |
| 1994 | 588.81 million | +0.4% |
| 1995 | 594.39 million | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 610.47 million | +2.7% |
| 1997 | 618.21 million | +1.3% |
| 1998 | 623.95 million | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 628.60 million | +0.7% |
| 2000 | 631.15 million | +0.4% |
| 2001 | 632.89 million | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 634.26 million | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 635.27 million | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 650.50 million | +2.4% |
| 2005 | 666.26 million | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 675.16 million | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 681.98 million | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 695.11 million | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 721.66 million | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 738.07 million | +2.3% |
| 2011 | 752.29 million | +1.9% |
| 2012 | 767.14 million | +2.0% |
| 2013 | 775.83 million | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 782.52 million | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 787.81 million | +0.7% |
| 2016 | 789.77 million | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 791.07 million | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 786.53 million | -0.6% |
| 2019 | 782.78 million | -0.5% |
| 2020 | 780.66 million | -0.3% |
| 2021 | 778.93 million | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 776.28 million | -0.3% |
| 2023 | 772.80 million | -0.4% |
| 2024 | 768.55 million | -0.5% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's 768.55 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 41% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Haiti's 768.55 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 47% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Haiti changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +112.1% | 1.73 million | 3.66 million |
| 1852 | +52.3% | 3.66 million | 5.58 million |
| 1853 | +36.5% | 5.58 million | 7.61 million |
| 1854 | +27.2% | 7.61 million | 9.68 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 10.89 million | 1.73 million | 20.60 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 32.30 million | 22.62 million | 42.10 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 51.77 million | 44.13 million | 59.14 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 75.40 million | 61.65 million | 90.22 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 111.04 million | 94.17 million | 127.72 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 153.26 million | 132.25 million | 175.25 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 206.41 million | 180.49 million | 233.80 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 267.68 million | 239.81 million | 295.07 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 330.24 million | 300.98 million | 359.21 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 399.54 million | 366.38 million | 432.63 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 477.17 million | 440.11 million | 518.38 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 547.98 million | 525.32 million | 567.77 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 572.28 million | 570.84 million | 575.76 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 579.23 million | 576.54 million | 582.18 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 600.08 million | 582.91 million | 628.60 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 662.42 million | 631.15 million | 721.66 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 775.38 million | 738.07 million | 791.07 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 775.45 million | 768.55 million | 780.66 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 94 Guyana 868.01 million compare
- 95 Afghanistan 862.50 million compare
- 96 Senegal 811.34 million compare
- 98 El Salvador 658.96 million compare
- 99 Iraq 644.60 million compare
- 100 Azerbaijan 613.94 million compare
More climate change data for Haiti
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 7.86 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 6,129 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,687 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 4,441 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 6.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 158.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 428.44 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 119.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 308.76 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.4516 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Haiti?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Haiti was 768.55 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 791.07 million in 2017.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.73 million in 1850.
- How does Haiti rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Haiti ranks 97th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).