Cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas
Bahamas: Cumulative co2 land use was 6.91 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
6.91 million
Change on year
down 0.3%
World rank
159th
of 197 countries
All-time high
9.76 million
in 1973
All-time low
2,125
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas is 6.91 million, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.3% on the previous year and down 3.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas peaked at 9.76 million in 1973 and was at its lowest, 2,125, in 1850.
Bahamas ranks 159th of 197 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 2,125 | — |
| 1851 | 4,250 | +100.0% |
| 1852 | 6,375 | +50.0% |
| 1853 | 8,500 | +33.3% |
| 1854 | 10,626 | +25.0% |
| 1855 | 12,787 | +20.3% |
| 1856 | 14,949 | +16.9% |
| 1857 | 17,111 | +14.5% |
| 1858 | 19,273 | +12.6% |
| 1859 | 21,434 | +11.2% |
| 1860 | 25,611 | +19.5% |
| 1861 | 30,814 | +20.3% |
| 1862 | 36,750 | +19.3% |
| 1863 | 43,272 | +17.7% |
| 1864 | 50,270 | +16.2% |
| 1865 | 57,671 | +14.7% |
| 1866 | 65,439 | +13.5% |
| 1867 | 73,536 | +12.4% |
| 1868 | 81,927 | +11.4% |
| 1869 | 90,574 | +10.6% |
| 1870 | 100,210 | +10.6% |
| 1871 | 110,360 | +10.1% |
| 1872 | 120,875 | +9.5% |
| 1873 | 131,684 | +8.9% |
| 1874 | 142,749 | +8.4% |
| 1875 | 154,071 | +7.9% |
| 1876 | 165,576 | +7.5% |
| 1877 | 177,264 | +7.1% |
| 1878 | 189,099 | +6.7% |
| 1879 | 201,080 | +6.3% |
| 1880 | 214,234 | +6.5% |
| 1881 | 227,901 | +6.4% |
| 1882 | 241,861 | +6.1% |
| 1883 | 256,077 | +5.9% |
| 1884 | 270,513 | +5.6% |
| 1885 | 285,096 | +5.4% |
| 1886 | 299,825 | +5.2% |
| 1887 | 314,701 | +5.0% |
| 1888 | 329,687 | +4.8% |
| 1889 | 344,746 | +4.6% |
| 1890 | 360,721 | +4.6% |
| 1891 | 377,062 | +4.5% |
| 1892 | 393,624 | +4.4% |
| 1893 | 410,368 | +4.3% |
| 1894 | 427,259 | +4.1% |
| 1895 | 444,297 | +4.0% |
| 1896 | 461,444 | +3.9% |
| 1897 | 478,665 | +3.7% |
| 1898 | 495,959 | +3.6% |
| 1899 | 513,326 | +3.5% |
| 1900 | 531,903 | +3.6% |
| 1901 | 550,956 | +3.6% |
| 1902 | 570,302 | +3.5% |
| 1903 | 589,867 | +3.4% |
| 1904 | 609,580 | +3.3% |
| 1905 | 629,439 | +3.3% |
| 1906 | 649,407 | +3.2% |
| 1907 | 669,449 | +3.1% |
| 1908 | 689,565 | +3.0% |
| 1909 | 709,717 | +2.9% |
| 1910 | 735,841 | +3.7% |
| 1911 | 764,567 | +3.9% |
| 1912 | 794,905 | +4.0% |
| 1913 | 826,452 | +4.0% |
| 1914 | 858,952 | +3.9% |
| 1915 | 892,221 | +3.9% |
| 1916 | 926,186 | +3.8% |
| 1917 | 960,701 | +3.7% |
| 1918 | 995,729 | +3.6% |
| 1919 | 1.03 million | +3.6% |
| 1920 | 1.07 million | +3.8% |
| 1921 | 1.11 million | +4.1% |
| 1922 | 1.16 million | +4.3% |
| 1923 | 1.22 million | +4.6% |
| 1924 | 1.27 million | +4.9% |
| 1925 | 1.34 million | +5.1% |
| 1926 | 1.41 million | +5.3% |
| 1927 | 1.49 million | +5.4% |
| 1928 | 1.57 million | +5.5% |
| 1929 | 1.66 million | +5.6% |
| 1930 | 1.76 million | +5.9% |
| 1931 | 1.86 million | +6.0% |
| 1932 | 1.97 million | +6.0% |
| 1933 | 2.09 million | +5.9% |
| 1934 | 2.21 million | +5.9% |
| 1935 | 2.34 million | +5.8% |
| 1936 | 2.47 million | +5.7% |
| 1937 | 2.61 million | +5.6% |
| 1938 | 2.75 million | +5.5% |
| 1939 | 2.90 million | +5.3% |
| 1940 | 3.06 million | +5.4% |
| 1941 | 3.22 million | +5.4% |
| 1942 | 3.39 million | +5.3% |
| 1943 | 3.57 million | +5.2% |
| 1944 | 3.75 million | +5.0% |
| 1945 | 3.93 million | +4.9% |
| 1946 | 4.12 million | +4.8% |
| 1947 | 4.31 million | +4.6% |
| 1948 | 4.50 million | +4.5% |
| 1949 | 4.70 million | +4.3% |
| 1950 | 4.89 million | +4.1% |
| 1951 | 5.08 million | +4.0% |
| 1952 | 5.29 million | +4.0% |
| 1953 | 5.50 million | +4.1% |
| 1954 | 5.73 million | +4.1% |
| 1955 | 5.97 million | +4.2% |
| 1956 | 6.23 million | +4.3% |
| 1957 | 6.51 million | +4.5% |
| 1958 | 6.81 million | +4.6% |
| 1959 | 7.13 million | +4.7% |
| 1960 | 7.40 million | +3.7% |
| 1961 | 7.63 million | +3.1% |
| 1962 | 7.89 million | +3.4% |
| 1963 | 8.09 million | +2.6% |
| 1964 | 8.36 million | +3.3% |
| 1965 | 8.60 million | +2.8% |
| 1966 | 8.82 million | +2.6% |
| 1967 | 9.01 million | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 9.19 million | +1.9% |
| 1969 | 9.37 million | +2.0% |
| 1970 | 9.52 million | +1.6% |
| 1971 | 9.63 million | +1.2% |
| 1972 | 9.73 million | +1.0% |
| 1973 | 9.76 million | +0.3% |
| 1974 | 9.72 million | -0.4% |
| 1975 | 9.63 million | -0.9% |
| 1976 | 9.50 million | -1.4% |
| 1977 | 9.35 million | -1.6% |
| 1978 | 9.18 million | -1.7% |
| 1979 | 9.03 million | -1.7% |
| 1980 | 8.89 million | -1.6% |
| 1981 | 8.75 million | -1.5% |
| 1982 | 8.62 million | -1.4% |
| 1983 | 8.50 million | -1.4% |
| 1984 | 8.38 million | -1.5% |
| 1985 | 8.26 million | -1.4% |
| 1986 | 8.14 million | -1.4% |
| 1987 | 8.04 million | -1.3% |
| 1988 | 7.94 million | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 7.84 million | -1.2% |
| 1990 | 7.76 million | -1.1% |
| 1991 | 7.68 million | -1.0% |
| 1992 | 7.60 million | -0.9% |
| 1993 | 7.51 million | -1.2% |
| 1994 | 7.43 million | -1.1% |
| 1995 | 7.39 million | -0.5% |
| 1996 | 7.38 million | -0.2% |
| 1997 | 7.37 million | -0.1% |
| 1998 | 7.31 million | -0.8% |
| 1999 | 7.40 million | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 7.36 million | -0.5% |
| 2001 | 7.29 million | -1.0% |
| 2002 | 7.21 million | -1.1% |
| 2003 | 7.13 million | -1.2% |
| 2004 | 7.05 million | -1.1% |
| 2005 | 6.97 million | -1.1% |
| 2006 | 6.89 million | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 6.84 million | -0.7% |
| 2008 | 6.77 million | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 6.91 million | +2.1% |
| 2010 | 7.10 million | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 7.14 million | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 7.15 million | +0.1% |
| 2013 | 7.15 million | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 7.14 million | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 7.12 million | -0.3% |
| 2016 | 7.09 million | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 7.07 million | -0.3% |
| 2018 | 7.05 million | -0.4% |
| 2019 | 7.02 million | -0.4% |
| 2020 | 7.00 million | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 6.97 million | -0.4% |
| 2022 | 6.95 million | -0.3% |
| 2023 | 6.93 million | -0.3% |
| 2024 | 6.91 million | -0.3% |
Bahamas compared with similar countries
- Bahamas's 6.91 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million, 2% of the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Bahamas's 6.91 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 0% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +100.0% | 2,125 | 4,250 |
| 1852 | +50.0% | 4,250 | 6,375 |
| 1853 | +33.3% | 6,375 | 8,500 |
| 1854 | +25.0% | 8,500 | 10,626 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 11,743 | 2,125 | 21,434 | 10 |
| 1860s | 55,587 | 25,611 | 90,574 | 10 |
| 1870s | 149,297 | 100,210 | 201,080 | 10 |
| 1880s | 278,464 | 214,234 | 344,746 | 10 |
| 1890s | 436,272 | 360,721 | 513,326 | 10 |
| 1900s | 620,018 | 531,903 | 709,717 | 10 |
| 1910s | 878,675 | 735,841 | 1.03 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.33 million | 1.07 million | 1.66 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.30 million | 1.76 million | 2.90 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 3.85 million | 3.06 million | 4.70 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 5.91 million | 4.89 million | 7.13 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 8.44 million | 7.40 million | 9.37 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 9.51 million | 9.03 million | 9.76 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.33 million | 7.84 million | 8.89 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.48 million | 7.31 million | 7.76 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.04 million | 6.77 million | 7.36 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.10 million | 7.02 million | 7.15 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.95 million | 6.91 million | 7.00 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bahamas
- 156 Germany 11.34 million compare
- 157 Djibouti 7.59 million compare
- 158 Cape Verde 7.44 million compare
- 160 Luxembourg 5.65 million compare
- 161 Sao Tome and Principe 4.28 million compare
- 162 Tonga 3.71 million compare
More climate change data for Bahamas
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 452,114 kg (2021)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 55.51 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 42.61 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 12.89 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.1608 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.4605 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 0.2307 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 0.0795 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 0.1512 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0003 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Bahamas was 6.91 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Bahamas?
- The highest recorded value was 9.76 million in 1973.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Bahamas?
- The lowest recorded value was 2,125 in 1850.
- How does Bahamas rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Bahamas ranks 159th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Bahamas?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bahamas data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).