Cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: Cumulative co2 land use was 7.44 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
7.44 million
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
158th
of 197 countries
All-time high
7.44 million
in 2024
All-time low
21,691
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde stood at 7.44 million. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde peaked at 7.44 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 21,691, in 1850.
That places Cape Verde 158th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 21,691 | — |
| 1851 | 43,785 | +101.9% |
| 1852 | 66,099 | +51.0% |
| 1853 | 88,522 | +33.9% |
| 1854 | 111,056 | +25.5% |
| 1855 | 133,626 | +20.3% |
| 1856 | 156,233 | +16.9% |
| 1857 | 178,876 | +14.5% |
| 1858 | 201,520 | +12.7% |
| 1859 | 224,200 | +11.3% |
| 1860 | 248,199 | +10.7% |
| 1861 | 272,821 | +9.9% |
| 1862 | 297,700 | +9.1% |
| 1863 | 322,725 | +8.4% |
| 1864 | 347,787 | +7.8% |
| 1865 | 372,849 | +7.2% |
| 1866 | 397,910 | +6.7% |
| 1867 | 422,972 | +6.3% |
| 1868 | 447,997 | +5.9% |
| 1869 | 473,022 | +5.6% |
| 1870 | 498,634 | +5.4% |
| 1871 | 524,575 | +5.2% |
| 1872 | 550,699 | +5.0% |
| 1873 | 576,970 | +4.8% |
| 1874 | 603,314 | +4.6% |
| 1875 | 629,732 | +4.4% |
| 1876 | 656,186 | +4.2% |
| 1877 | 682,676 | +4.0% |
| 1878 | 709,204 | +3.9% |
| 1879 | 735,768 | +3.7% |
| 1880 | 763,175 | +3.7% |
| 1881 | 791,021 | +3.6% |
| 1882 | 819,160 | +3.6% |
| 1883 | 847,447 | +3.5% |
| 1884 | 875,843 | +3.4% |
| 1885 | 904,348 | +3.3% |
| 1886 | 932,928 | +3.2% |
| 1887 | 961,544 | +3.1% |
| 1888 | 990,233 | +3.0% |
| 1889 | 1.02 million | +2.9% |
| 1890 | 1.05 million | +2.9% |
| 1891 | 1.08 million | +2.9% |
| 1892 | 1.11 million | +2.8% |
| 1893 | 1.14 million | +2.8% |
| 1894 | 1.17 million | +2.7% |
| 1895 | 1.20 million | +2.6% |
| 1896 | 1.23 million | +2.6% |
| 1897 | 1.26 million | +2.5% |
| 1898 | 1.29 million | +2.5% |
| 1899 | 1.33 million | +2.4% |
| 1900 | 1.36 million | +2.4% |
| 1901 | 1.39 million | +2.4% |
| 1902 | 1.42 million | +2.3% |
| 1903 | 1.45 million | +2.3% |
| 1904 | 1.49 million | +2.2% |
| 1905 | 1.52 million | +2.2% |
| 1906 | 1.55 million | +2.2% |
| 1907 | 1.59 million | +2.1% |
| 1908 | 1.62 million | +2.1% |
| 1909 | 1.65 million | +2.1% |
| 1910 | 1.69 million | +2.1% |
| 1911 | 1.72 million | +2.1% |
| 1912 | 1.76 million | +2.1% |
| 1913 | 1.79 million | +2.1% |
| 1914 | 1.83 million | +2.0% |
| 1915 | 1.87 million | +2.0% |
| 1916 | 1.90 million | +2.0% |
| 1917 | 1.94 million | +1.9% |
| 1918 | 1.98 million | +1.9% |
| 1919 | 2.02 million | +1.9% |
| 1920 | 2.05 million | +1.9% |
| 1921 | 2.09 million | +1.9% |
| 1922 | 2.13 million | +1.9% |
| 1923 | 2.17 million | +1.9% |
| 1924 | 2.21 million | +1.8% |
| 1925 | 2.25 million | +1.8% |
| 1926 | 2.29 million | +1.8% |
| 1927 | 2.33 million | +1.7% |
| 1928 | 2.37 million | +1.7% |
| 1929 | 2.41 million | +1.7% |
| 1930 | 2.45 million | +1.7% |
| 1931 | 2.50 million | +1.7% |
| 1932 | 2.54 million | +1.7% |
| 1933 | 2.58 million | +1.7% |
| 1934 | 2.62 million | +1.7% |
| 1935 | 2.67 million | +1.6% |
| 1936 | 2.71 million | +1.6% |
| 1937 | 2.75 million | +1.6% |
| 1938 | 2.80 million | +1.6% |
| 1939 | 2.84 million | +1.6% |
| 1940 | 2.88 million | +1.6% |
| 1941 | 2.93 million | +1.6% |
| 1942 | 2.98 million | +1.6% |
| 1943 | 3.02 million | +1.6% |
| 1944 | 3.07 million | +1.5% |
| 1945 | 3.12 million | +1.5% |
| 1946 | 3.16 million | +1.5% |
| 1947 | 3.21 million | +1.5% |
| 1948 | 3.26 million | +1.5% |
| 1949 | 3.30 million | +1.4% |
| 1950 | 3.45 million | +4.4% |
| 1951 | 3.61 million | +4.8% |
| 1952 | 3.75 million | +3.7% |
| 1953 | 3.85 million | +2.7% |
| 1954 | 3.92 million | +1.8% |
| 1955 | 3.97 million | +1.2% |
| 1956 | 4.01 million | +0.9% |
| 1957 | 4.04 million | +0.8% |
| 1958 | 4.08 million | +1.0% |
| 1959 | 4.14 million | +1.5% |
| 1960 | 4.18 million | +0.9% |
| 1961 | 4.20 million | +0.6% |
| 1962 | 4.22 million | +0.5% |
| 1963 | 4.24 million | +0.4% |
| 1964 | 4.25 million | +0.3% |
| 1965 | 4.26 million | +0.3% |
| 1966 | 4.27 million | +0.2% |
| 1967 | 4.28 million | +0.2% |
| 1968 | 4.29 million | +0.2% |
| 1969 | 4.30 million | +0.2% |
| 1970 | 4.30 million | +0.1% |
| 1971 | 4.31 million | +0.1% |
| 1972 | 4.31 million | +0.1% |
| 1973 | 4.32 million | +0.2% |
| 1974 | 4.33 million | +0.2% |
| 1975 | 4.34 million | +0.1% |
| 1976 | 4.34 million | +0.1% |
| 1977 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 4.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 4.35 million | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 4.35 million | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 4.51 million | +3.6% |
| 1988 | 4.58 million | +1.7% |
| 1989 | 4.71 million | +2.7% |
| 1990 | 4.78 million | +1.5% |
| 1991 | 4.90 million | +2.5% |
| 1992 | 4.96 million | +1.4% |
| 1993 | 5.01 million | +1.1% |
| 1994 | 5.13 million | +2.3% |
| 1995 | 5.21 million | +1.7% |
| 1996 | 5.42 million | +4.0% |
| 1997 | 5.55 million | +2.3% |
| 1998 | 5.62 million | +1.3% |
| 1999 | 5.69 million | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 5.89 million | +3.6% |
| 2001 | 6.07 million | +3.1% |
| 2002 | 6.18 million | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 6.32 million | +2.3% |
| 2004 | 6.41 million | +1.4% |
| 2005 | 6.47 million | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 6.52 million | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 6.72 million | +3.0% |
| 2008 | 6.82 million | +1.6% |
| 2009 | 6.89 million | +0.9% |
| 2010 | 7.05 million | +2.4% |
| 2011 | 7.13 million | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 7.24 million | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 7.29 million | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 7.32 million | +0.5% |
| 2015 | 7.34 million | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 7.38 million | +0.6% |
| 2017 | 7.42 million | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 7.43 million | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 7.43 million | +0.1% |
| 2020 | 7.43 million | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 7.43 million | -0.0% |
| 2022 | 7.43 million | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 7.43 million | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 7.44 million | +0.0% |
Cape Verde compared with similar countries
- Cape Verde's 7.44 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 1% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cape Verde's 7.44 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 0% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +101.9% | 21,691 | 43,785 |
| 1852 | +51.0% | 43,785 | 66,099 |
| 1853 | +33.9% | 66,099 | 88,522 |
| 1854 | +25.5% | 88,522 | 111,056 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 122,561 | 21,691 | 224,200 | 10 |
| 1860s | 360,398 | 248,199 | 473,022 | 10 |
| 1870s | 616,776 | 498,634 | 735,768 | 10 |
| 1880s | 890,466 | 763,175 | 1.02 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.19 million | 1.05 million | 1.33 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.50 million | 1.36 million | 1.65 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.85 million | 1.69 million | 2.02 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 2.23 million | 2.05 million | 2.41 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.65 million | 2.45 million | 2.84 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 3.09 million | 2.88 million | 3.30 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 3.88 million | 3.45 million | 4.14 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 4.25 million | 4.18 million | 4.30 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 4.33 million | 4.30 million | 4.34 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.42 million | 4.34 million | 4.71 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.23 million | 4.78 million | 5.69 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.43 million | 5.89 million | 6.89 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.30 million | 7.05 million | 7.43 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.43 million | 7.43 million | 7.44 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
More climate change data for Cape Verde
- Share co2 vs population 0.0041 (2100)
- Co2 gdp growth, annual growth rate -9.9 % change on previous year (2025)
- Co2 gdp pop growth, annual growth rate -4.27 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 0.4666 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 1.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.7763 units per person (2025)
- Precipitation anomalies, annual growth rate -101.1 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population 77.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Cape Verde was 7.44 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 7.44 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 21,691 in 1850.
- How does Cape Verde rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Cape Verde ranks 158th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Cape Verde?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).