Cumulative co2 land use in Belgium
Belgium: Cumulative co2 land use was 415.99 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
415.99 million
Change on year
up 0.9%
World rank
113th
of 197 countries
All-time high
432.34 million
in 1936
All-time low
4.56 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Belgium, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Belgium recorded 415.99 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024.
The figure is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 9.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Belgium peaked at 432.34 million in 1936 and was at its lowest, 4.56 million, in 1850.
That places Belgium 113th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 175 years of available data.
Cumulative co2 land use in Belgium, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 4.56 million | — |
| 1851 | 9.11 million | +99.7% |
| 1852 | 13.41 million | +47.2% |
| 1853 | 18.08 million | +34.8% |
| 1854 | 23.00 million | +27.2% |
| 1855 | 27.47 million | +19.4% |
| 1856 | 32.33 million | +17.7% |
| 1857 | 37.38 million | +15.6% |
| 1858 | 42.14 million | +12.7% |
| 1859 | 46.30 million | +9.9% |
| 1860 | 51.39 million | +11.0% |
| 1861 | 56.30 million | +9.6% |
| 1862 | 60.77 million | +7.9% |
| 1863 | 65.26 million | +7.4% |
| 1864 | 69.78 million | +6.9% |
| 1865 | 73.90 million | +5.9% |
| 1866 | 77.86 million | +5.4% |
| 1867 | 82.65 million | +6.1% |
| 1868 | 87.18 million | +5.5% |
| 1869 | 91.80 million | +5.3% |
| 1870 | 97.33 million | +6.0% |
| 1871 | 103.13 million | +6.0% |
| 1872 | 108.82 million | +5.5% |
| 1873 | 115.14 million | +5.8% |
| 1874 | 121.87 million | +5.8% |
| 1875 | 128.18 million | +5.2% |
| 1876 | 135.06 million | +5.4% |
| 1877 | 142.25 million | +5.3% |
| 1878 | 149.05 million | +4.8% |
| 1879 | 155.38 million | +4.3% |
| 1880 | 162.83 million | +4.8% |
| 1881 | 170.04 million | +4.4% |
| 1882 | 176.79 million | +4.0% |
| 1883 | 183.67 million | +3.9% |
| 1884 | 190.69 million | +3.8% |
| 1885 | 197.15 million | +3.4% |
| 1886 | 203.53 million | +3.2% |
| 1887 | 211.16 million | +3.7% |
| 1888 | 218.54 million | +3.5% |
| 1889 | 226.09 million | +3.5% |
| 1890 | 234.52 million | +3.7% |
| 1891 | 242.46 million | +3.4% |
| 1892 | 249.70 million | +3.0% |
| 1893 | 257.60 million | +3.2% |
| 1894 | 265.50 million | +3.1% |
| 1895 | 272.58 million | +2.7% |
| 1896 | 280.04 million | +2.7% |
| 1897 | 287.45 million | +2.6% |
| 1898 | 294.17 million | +2.3% |
| 1899 | 300.24 million | +2.1% |
| 1900 | 307.78 million | +2.5% |
| 1901 | 315.11 million | +2.4% |
| 1902 | 321.86 million | +2.1% |
| 1903 | 327.89 million | +1.9% |
| 1904 | 334.47 million | +2.0% |
| 1905 | 340.89 million | +1.9% |
| 1906 | 346.59 million | +1.7% |
| 1907 | 352.55 million | +1.7% |
| 1908 | 358.36 million | +1.6% |
| 1909 | 363.52 million | +1.4% |
| 1910 | 367.91 million | +1.2% |
| 1911 | 373.26 million | +1.5% |
| 1912 | 378.00 million | +1.3% |
| 1913 | 381.98 million | +1.1% |
| 1914 | 385.79 million | +1.0% |
| 1915 | 389.37 million | +0.9% |
| 1916 | 392.41 million | +0.8% |
| 1917 | 395.09 million | +0.7% |
| 1918 | 398.34 million | +0.8% |
| 1919 | 401.13 million | +0.7% |
| 1920 | 403.88 million | +0.7% |
| 1921 | 407.37 million | +0.9% |
| 1922 | 411.15 million | +0.9% |
| 1923 | 413.66 million | +0.6% |
| 1924 | 415.66 million | +0.5% |
| 1925 | 417.59 million | +0.5% |
| 1926 | 419.71 million | +0.5% |
| 1927 | 421.74 million | +0.5% |
| 1928 | 423.88 million | +0.5% |
| 1929 | 426.23 million | +0.6% |
| 1930 | 427.90 million | +0.4% |
| 1931 | 429.01 million | +0.3% |
| 1932 | 430.15 million | +0.3% |
| 1933 | 431.16 million | +0.2% |
| 1934 | 432.01 million | +0.2% |
| 1935 | 432.24 million | +0.1% |
| 1936 | 432.34 million | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 432.02 million | -0.1% |
| 1938 | 431.98 million | -0.0% |
| 1939 | 431.37 million | -0.1% |
| 1940 | 430.62 million | -0.2% |
| 1941 | 429.78 million | -0.2% |
| 1942 | 428.64 million | -0.3% |
| 1943 | 427.62 million | -0.2% |
| 1944 | 426.43 million | -0.3% |
| 1945 | 424.95 million | -0.3% |
| 1946 | 423.31 million | -0.4% |
| 1947 | 421.56 million | -0.4% |
| 1948 | 419.69 million | -0.4% |
| 1949 | 417.89 million | -0.4% |
| 1950 | 415.66 million | -0.5% |
| 1951 | 413.08 million | -0.6% |
| 1952 | 410.61 million | -0.6% |
| 1953 | 408.12 million | -0.6% |
| 1954 | 405.43 million | -0.7% |
| 1955 | 402.74 million | -0.7% |
| 1956 | 399.82 million | -0.7% |
| 1957 | 396.94 million | -0.7% |
| 1958 | 393.75 million | -0.8% |
| 1959 | 390.75 million | -0.8% |
| 1960 | 388.02 million | -0.7% |
| 1961 | 385.15 million | -0.7% |
| 1962 | 382.33 million | -0.7% |
| 1963 | 379.51 million | -0.7% |
| 1964 | 376.89 million | -0.7% |
| 1965 | 374.17 million | -0.7% |
| 1966 | 371.50 million | -0.7% |
| 1967 | 369.12 million | -0.6% |
| 1968 | 366.70 million | -0.7% |
| 1969 | 364.33 million | -0.6% |
| 1970 | 362.08 million | -0.6% |
| 1971 | 360.04 million | -0.6% |
| 1972 | 358.03 million | -0.6% |
| 1973 | 356.05 million | -0.6% |
| 1974 | 354.13 million | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 352.33 million | -0.5% |
| 1976 | 350.73 million | -0.5% |
| 1977 | 349.00 million | -0.5% |
| 1978 | 347.03 million | -0.6% |
| 1979 | 341.41 million | -1.6% |
| 1980 | 336.12 million | -1.5% |
| 1981 | 331.06 million | -1.5% |
| 1982 | 326.39 million | -1.4% |
| 1983 | 322.29 million | -1.3% |
| 1984 | 318.54 million | -1.2% |
| 1985 | 314.96 million | -1.1% |
| 1986 | 311.81 million | -1.0% |
| 1987 | 308.84 million | -1.0% |
| 1988 | 306.38 million | -0.8% |
| 1989 | 304.33 million | -0.7% |
| 1990 | 302.48 million | -0.6% |
| 1991 | 306.55 million | +1.3% |
| 1992 | 308.65 million | +0.7% |
| 1993 | 317.85 million | +3.0% |
| 1994 | 321.19 million | +1.1% |
| 1995 | 323.54 million | +0.7% |
| 1996 | 326.65 million | +1.0% |
| 1997 | 329.66 million | +0.9% |
| 1998 | 332.98 million | +1.0% |
| 1999 | 339.24 million | +1.9% |
| 2000 | 342.62 million | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 345.15 million | +0.7% |
| 2002 | 348.01 million | +0.8% |
| 2003 | 351.63 million | +1.0% |
| 2004 | 356.17 million | +1.3% |
| 2005 | 359.05 million | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 361.57 million | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 364.19 million | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 366.24 million | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 368.36 million | +0.6% |
| 2010 | 370.05 million | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 371.31 million | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 374.04 million | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 376.35 million | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 379.64 million | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 384.05 million | +1.2% |
| 2016 | 386.91 million | +0.7% |
| 2017 | 390.98 million | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 394.70 million | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 398.58 million | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 401.96 million | +0.8% |
| 2021 | 404.91 million | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 408.44 million | +0.9% |
| 2023 | 412.15 million | +0.9% |
| 2024 | 415.99 million | +0.9% |
Belgium compared with similar countries
- Belgium's 415.99 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million, 1.3× the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Belgium's 415.99 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 98% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Belgium changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +99.7% | 4.56 million | 9.11 million |
| 1852 | +47.2% | 9.11 million | 13.41 million |
| 1853 | +34.8% | 13.41 million | 18.08 million |
| 1854 | +27.2% | 18.08 million | 23.00 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 25.38 million | 4.56 million | 46.30 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 71.69 million | 51.39 million | 91.80 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 125.62 million | 97.33 million | 155.38 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 194.05 million | 162.83 million | 226.09 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 268.43 million | 234.52 million | 300.24 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 336.90 million | 307.78 million | 363.52 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 386.33 million | 367.91 million | 401.13 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 416.09 million | 403.88 million | 426.23 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 431.02 million | 427.90 million | 432.34 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 425.05 million | 417.89 million | 430.62 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 403.69 million | 390.75 million | 415.66 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 375.77 million | 364.33 million | 388.02 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 353.08 million | 341.41 million | 362.08 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 318.07 million | 304.33 million | 336.12 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 320.88 million | 302.48 million | 339.24 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 356.30 million | 342.62 million | 368.36 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 382.66 million | 370.05 million | 398.58 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 408.69 million | 401.96 million | 415.99 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
More climate change data for Belgium
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 143.51 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 8,360 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,763 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6,597 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 6.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 235.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,004 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 993.72 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.01 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.75 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Belgium?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Belgium was 415.99 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 432.34 million in 1936.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.56 million in 1850.
- How does Belgium rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Belgium ranks 113th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).