Cumulative co2 land use in Poland
Poland: Cumulative co2 land use was 435.76 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
435.76 million
Change on year
down 6.2%
World rank
112th
of 197 countries
All-time high
2.17 billion
in 1937
All-time low
37.74 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Poland, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Poland recorded 435.76 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024.
The figure is down 6.2% on the previous year and down 42.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Poland peaked at 2.17 billion in 1937 and was at its lowest, 37.74 million, in 1850.
Poland ranks 112th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 175 years of available data.
Cumulative co2 land use in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 37.74 million | — |
| 1851 | 76.80 million | +103.5% |
| 1852 | 116.48 million | +51.7% |
| 1853 | 156.24 million | +34.1% |
| 1854 | 196.38 million | +25.7% |
| 1855 | 236.30 million | +20.3% |
| 1856 | 275.79 million | +16.7% |
| 1857 | 315.01 million | +14.2% |
| 1858 | 353.78 million | +12.3% |
| 1859 | 392.42 million | +10.9% |
| 1860 | 430.38 million | +9.7% |
| 1861 | 467.60 million | +8.6% |
| 1862 | 504.24 million | +7.8% |
| 1863 | 540.54 million | +7.2% |
| 1864 | 576.24 million | +6.6% |
| 1865 | 611.51 million | +6.1% |
| 1866 | 646.32 million | +5.7% |
| 1867 | 681.02 million | +5.4% |
| 1868 | 714.73 million | +5.0% |
| 1869 | 748.17 million | +4.7% |
| 1870 | 784.08 million | +4.8% |
| 1871 | 820.39 million | +4.6% |
| 1872 | 857.13 million | +4.5% |
| 1873 | 893.65 million | +4.3% |
| 1874 | 930.41 million | +4.1% |
| 1875 | 967.02 million | +3.9% |
| 1876 | 1.00 billion | +3.7% |
| 1877 | 1.04 billion | +3.5% |
| 1878 | 1.07 billion | +3.4% |
| 1879 | 1.11 billion | +3.3% |
| 1880 | 1.14 billion | +3.1% |
| 1881 | 1.18 billion | +3.0% |
| 1882 | 1.21 billion | +2.9% |
| 1883 | 1.24 billion | +2.8% |
| 1884 | 1.28 billion | +2.6% |
| 1885 | 1.31 billion | +2.5% |
| 1886 | 1.34 billion | +2.5% |
| 1887 | 1.37 billion | +2.4% |
| 1888 | 1.41 billion | +2.3% |
| 1889 | 1.44 billion | +2.2% |
| 1890 | 1.47 billion | +2.0% |
| 1891 | 1.49 billion | +1.9% |
| 1892 | 1.52 billion | +1.8% |
| 1893 | 1.55 billion | +1.8% |
| 1894 | 1.57 billion | +1.7% |
| 1895 | 1.60 billion | +1.7% |
| 1896 | 1.63 billion | +1.6% |
| 1897 | 1.65 billion | +1.5% |
| 1898 | 1.67 billion | +1.5% |
| 1899 | 1.70 billion | +1.4% |
| 1900 | 1.72 billion | +1.4% |
| 1901 | 1.75 billion | +1.4% |
| 1902 | 1.77 billion | +1.3% |
| 1903 | 1.79 billion | +1.3% |
| 1904 | 1.82 billion | +1.3% |
| 1905 | 1.84 billion | +1.3% |
| 1906 | 1.86 billion | +1.3% |
| 1907 | 1.89 billion | +1.2% |
| 1908 | 1.91 billion | +1.2% |
| 1909 | 1.93 billion | +1.2% |
| 1910 | 1.95 billion | +0.8% |
| 1911 | 1.95 billion | +0.5% |
| 1912 | 1.96 billion | +0.1% |
| 1913 | 1.95 billion | -0.1% |
| 1914 | 1.95 billion | -0.4% |
| 1915 | 1.93 billion | -0.7% |
| 1916 | 1.92 billion | -0.9% |
| 1917 | 1.89 billion | -1.2% |
| 1918 | 1.87 billion | -1.4% |
| 1919 | 1.84 billion | -1.6% |
| 1920 | 1.82 billion | -0.9% |
| 1921 | 1.81 billion | -0.4% |
| 1922 | 1.82 billion | +0.1% |
| 1923 | 1.83 billion | +0.6% |
| 1924 | 1.84 billion | +1.0% |
| 1925 | 1.87 billion | +1.4% |
| 1926 | 1.90 billion | +1.8% |
| 1927 | 1.94 billion | +2.1% |
| 1928 | 1.99 billion | +2.4% |
| 1929 | 2.04 billion | +2.6% |
| 1930 | 2.08 billion | +1.8% |
| 1931 | 2.10 billion | +1.4% |
| 1932 | 2.13 billion | +1.1% |
| 1933 | 2.15 billion | +0.8% |
| 1934 | 2.16 billion | +0.6% |
| 1935 | 2.17 billion | +0.4% |
| 1936 | 2.17 billion | +0.2% |
| 1937 | 2.17 billion | +0.1% |
| 1938 | 2.17 billion | -0.1% |
| 1939 | 2.17 billion | -0.2% |
| 1940 | 2.15 billion | -0.5% |
| 1941 | 2.14 billion | -0.8% |
| 1942 | 2.12 billion | -1.0% |
| 1943 | 2.09 billion | -1.2% |
| 1944 | 2.06 billion | -1.4% |
| 1945 | 2.03 billion | -1.7% |
| 1946 | 1.99 billion | -1.9% |
| 1947 | 1.95 billion | -2.1% |
| 1948 | 1.90 billion | -2.3% |
| 1949 | 1.85 billion | -2.5% |
| 1950 | 1.82 billion | -1.9% |
| 1951 | 1.79 billion | -1.4% |
| 1952 | 1.78 billion | -0.9% |
| 1953 | 1.77 billion | -0.5% |
| 1954 | 1.77 billion | -0.2% |
| 1955 | 1.77 billion | +0.1% |
| 1956 | 1.77 billion | +0.3% |
| 1957 | 1.78 billion | +0.4% |
| 1958 | 1.79 billion | +0.4% |
| 1959 | 1.79 billion | +0.4% |
| 1960 | 1.80 billion | +0.2% |
| 1961 | 1.80 billion | -0.0% |
| 1962 | 1.79 billion | -0.2% |
| 1963 | 1.79 billion | -0.3% |
| 1964 | 1.78 billion | -0.6% |
| 1965 | 1.77 billion | -0.5% |
| 1966 | 1.76 billion | -0.7% |
| 1967 | 1.75 billion | -0.7% |
| 1968 | 1.73 billion | -0.9% |
| 1969 | 1.72 billion | -0.9% |
| 1970 | 1.70 billion | -0.9% |
| 1971 | 1.68 billion | -1.0% |
| 1972 | 1.67 billion | -1.0% |
| 1973 | 1.65 billion | -1.0% |
| 1974 | 1.63 billion | -1.0% |
| 1975 | 1.62 billion | -0.9% |
| 1976 | 1.60 billion | -0.9% |
| 1977 | 1.59 billion | -0.9% |
| 1978 | 1.57 billion | -0.9% |
| 1979 | 1.56 billion | -0.9% |
| 1980 | 1.54 billion | -1.0% |
| 1981 | 1.53 billion | -1.0% |
| 1982 | 1.51 billion | -0.9% |
| 1983 | 1.51 billion | -0.4% |
| 1984 | 1.50 billion | -0.7% |
| 1985 | 1.49 billion | -0.7% |
| 1986 | 1.48 billion | -0.7% |
| 1987 | 1.47 billion | -0.7% |
| 1988 | 1.46 billion | -0.7% |
| 1989 | 1.45 billion | -0.6% |
| 1990 | 1.44 billion | -0.6% |
| 1991 | 1.43 billion | -0.6% |
| 1992 | 1.42 billion | -0.6% |
| 1993 | 1.41 billion | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 1.41 billion | -0.3% |
| 1995 | 1.40 billion | -0.8% |
| 1996 | 1.39 billion | -0.7% |
| 1997 | 1.38 billion | -0.6% |
| 1998 | 1.38 billion | -0.3% |
| 1999 | 1.37 billion | -0.5% |
| 2000 | 1.35 billion | -1.4% |
| 2001 | 1.32 billion | -2.5% |
| 2002 | 1.28 billion | -3.3% |
| 2003 | 1.25 billion | -2.2% |
| 2004 | 1.20 billion | -3.5% |
| 2005 | 1.17 billion | -2.9% |
| 2006 | 1.12 billion | -4.1% |
| 2007 | 1.09 billion | -2.9% |
| 2008 | 1.05 billion | -3.3% |
| 2009 | 989.35 million | -6.0% |
| 2010 | 957.18 million | -3.3% |
| 2011 | 906.84 million | -5.3% |
| 2012 | 853.57 million | -5.9% |
| 2013 | 805.38 million | -5.6% |
| 2014 | 756.44 million | -6.1% |
| 2015 | 708.92 million | -6.3% |
| 2016 | 664.50 million | -6.3% |
| 2017 | 621.14 million | -6.5% |
| 2018 | 597.73 million | -3.8% |
| 2019 | 585.91 million | -2.0% |
| 2020 | 557.18 million | -4.9% |
| 2021 | 525.54 million | -5.7% |
| 2022 | 494.61 million | -5.9% |
| 2023 | 464.65 million | -6.1% |
| 2024 | 435.76 million | -6.2% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 435.76 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 323.46 million, 1.3× the median. (64 countries reporting)
- Poland's 435.76 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 1.0× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +103.5% | 37.74 million | 76.80 million |
| 1852 | +51.7% | 76.80 million | 116.48 million |
| 1853 | +34.1% | 116.48 million | 156.24 million |
| 1854 | +25.7% | 156.24 million | 196.38 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 215.69 million | 37.74 million | 392.42 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 592.07 million | 430.38 million | 748.17 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 947.67 million | 784.08 million | 1.11 billion | 10 |
| 1880s | 1.29 billion | 1.14 billion | 1.44 billion | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.58 billion | 1.47 billion | 1.70 billion | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.83 billion | 1.72 billion | 1.93 billion | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.92 billion | 1.84 billion | 1.96 billion | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.89 billion | 1.81 billion | 2.04 billion | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.15 billion | 2.08 billion | 2.17 billion | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.03 billion | 1.85 billion | 2.15 billion | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.78 billion | 1.77 billion | 1.82 billion | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.77 billion | 1.72 billion | 1.80 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.63 billion | 1.56 billion | 1.70 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.49 billion | 1.45 billion | 1.54 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.40 billion | 1.37 billion | 1.44 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.18 billion | 989.35 million | 1.35 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 745.76 million | 585.91 million | 957.18 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 495.55 million | 435.76 million | 557.18 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More climate change data for Poland
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.05 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,935 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,534 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 15,401 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 550.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 7,175 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 7,089 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 86.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 26.75 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Poland?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Poland was 435.76 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 2.17 billion in 1937.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 37.74 million in 1850.
- How does Poland rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Poland ranks 112th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).