Cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Cumulative co2 land use was 398.10 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
398.10 million
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
115th
of 197 countries
All-time high
449.72 million
in 1987
All-time low
1.81 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan is 398.10 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.2% on the previous year and down 3.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan peaked at 449.72 million in 1987 and was at its lowest, 1.81 million, in 1850.
Uzbekistan ranks 115th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 1.81 million | — |
| 1851 | 3.63 million | +101.0% |
| 1852 | 5.46 million | +50.6% |
| 1853 | 7.31 million | +33.7% |
| 1854 | 9.16 million | +25.3% |
| 1855 | 11.01 million | +20.3% |
| 1856 | 12.87 million | +16.9% |
| 1857 | 14.74 million | +14.5% |
| 1858 | 16.60 million | +12.7% |
| 1859 | 18.48 million | +11.3% |
| 1860 | 20.38 million | +10.3% |
| 1861 | 22.31 million | +9.4% |
| 1862 | 24.24 million | +8.7% |
| 1863 | 26.19 million | +8.0% |
| 1864 | 28.14 million | +7.5% |
| 1865 | 30.10 million | +7.0% |
| 1866 | 32.06 million | +6.5% |
| 1867 | 34.02 million | +6.1% |
| 1868 | 35.99 million | +5.8% |
| 1869 | 37.97 million | +5.5% |
| 1870 | 39.97 million | +5.3% |
| 1871 | 42.01 million | +5.1% |
| 1872 | 44.05 million | +4.9% |
| 1873 | 46.11 million | +4.7% |
| 1874 | 48.17 million | +4.5% |
| 1875 | 50.24 million | +4.3% |
| 1876 | 52.32 million | +4.1% |
| 1877 | 54.40 million | +4.0% |
| 1878 | 56.48 million | +3.8% |
| 1879 | 58.57 million | +3.7% |
| 1880 | 60.70 million | +3.6% |
| 1881 | 62.84 million | +3.5% |
| 1882 | 65.00 million | +3.4% |
| 1883 | 67.17 million | +3.3% |
| 1884 | 69.35 million | +3.2% |
| 1885 | 71.54 million | +3.2% |
| 1886 | 73.73 million | +3.1% |
| 1887 | 75.93 million | +3.0% |
| 1888 | 78.13 million | +2.9% |
| 1889 | 80.33 million | +2.8% |
| 1890 | 82.58 million | +2.8% |
| 1891 | 84.85 million | +2.7% |
| 1892 | 87.14 million | +2.7% |
| 1893 | 89.43 million | +2.6% |
| 1894 | 91.74 million | +2.6% |
| 1895 | 94.05 million | +2.5% |
| 1896 | 96.37 million | +2.5% |
| 1897 | 98.70 million | +2.4% |
| 1898 | 101.03 million | +2.4% |
| 1899 | 103.36 million | +2.3% |
| 1900 | 105.74 million | +2.3% |
| 1901 | 108.15 million | +2.3% |
| 1902 | 110.58 million | +2.2% |
| 1903 | 113.01 million | +2.2% |
| 1904 | 115.46 million | +2.2% |
| 1905 | 117.91 million | +2.1% |
| 1906 | 120.36 million | +2.1% |
| 1907 | 122.83 million | +2.0% |
| 1908 | 125.29 million | +2.0% |
| 1909 | 127.76 million | +2.0% |
| 1910 | 130.28 million | +2.0% |
| 1911 | 132.82 million | +1.9% |
| 1912 | 135.38 million | +1.9% |
| 1913 | 137.95 million | +1.9% |
| 1914 | 140.52 million | +1.9% |
| 1915 | 143.11 million | +1.8% |
| 1916 | 145.70 million | +1.8% |
| 1917 | 148.29 million | +1.8% |
| 1918 | 150.89 million | +1.8% |
| 1919 | 153.49 million | +1.7% |
| 1920 | 156.15 million | +1.7% |
| 1921 | 158.84 million | +1.7% |
| 1922 | 161.54 million | +1.7% |
| 1923 | 164.25 million | +1.7% |
| 1924 | 166.98 million | +1.7% |
| 1925 | 169.71 million | +1.6% |
| 1926 | 172.44 million | +1.6% |
| 1927 | 175.19 million | +1.6% |
| 1928 | 177.94 million | +1.6% |
| 1929 | 180.69 million | +1.5% |
| 1930 | 183.47 million | +1.5% |
| 1931 | 186.26 million | +1.5% |
| 1932 | 189.06 million | +1.5% |
| 1933 | 191.85 million | +1.5% |
| 1934 | 194.64 million | +1.5% |
| 1935 | 197.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1936 | 200.23 million | +1.4% |
| 1937 | 203.02 million | +1.4% |
| 1938 | 205.81 million | +1.4% |
| 1939 | 208.60 million | +1.4% |
| 1940 | 211.52 million | +1.4% |
| 1941 | 214.51 million | +1.4% |
| 1942 | 217.54 million | +1.4% |
| 1943 | 220.60 million | +1.4% |
| 1944 | 223.69 million | +1.4% |
| 1945 | 226.79 million | +1.4% |
| 1946 | 229.91 million | +1.4% |
| 1947 | 233.04 million | +1.4% |
| 1948 | 236.18 million | +1.3% |
| 1949 | 239.33 million | +1.3% |
| 1950 | 248.27 million | +3.7% |
| 1951 | 259.82 million | +4.7% |
| 1952 | 272.91 million | +5.0% |
| 1953 | 287.17 million | +5.2% |
| 1954 | 302.49 million | +5.3% |
| 1955 | 318.87 million | +5.4% |
| 1956 | 336.39 million | +5.5% |
| 1957 | 355.04 million | +5.5% |
| 1958 | 374.92 million | +5.6% |
| 1959 | 395.96 million | +5.6% |
| 1960 | 408.86 million | +3.3% |
| 1961 | 418.42 million | +2.3% |
| 1962 | 424.63 million | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 428.86 million | +1.0% |
| 1964 | 432.17 million | +0.8% |
| 1965 | 433.98 million | +0.4% |
| 1966 | 435.47 million | +0.3% |
| 1967 | 436.69 million | +0.3% |
| 1968 | 438.24 million | +0.4% |
| 1969 | 439.29 million | +0.2% |
| 1970 | 440.21 million | +0.2% |
| 1971 | 440.99 million | +0.2% |
| 1972 | 441.56 million | +0.1% |
| 1973 | 442.89 million | +0.3% |
| 1974 | 443.50 million | +0.1% |
| 1975 | 444.21 million | +0.2% |
| 1976 | 445.02 million | +0.2% |
| 1977 | 445.29 million | +0.1% |
| 1978 | 445.25 million | -0.0% |
| 1979 | 445.63 million | +0.1% |
| 1980 | 446.15 million | +0.1% |
| 1981 | 446.67 million | +0.1% |
| 1982 | 447.35 million | +0.2% |
| 1983 | 447.70 million | +0.1% |
| 1984 | 448.19 million | +0.1% |
| 1985 | 448.79 million | +0.1% |
| 1986 | 449.40 million | +0.1% |
| 1987 | 449.72 million | +0.1% |
| 1988 | 449.23 million | -0.1% |
| 1989 | 448.43 million | -0.2% |
| 1990 | 447.89 million | -0.1% |
| 1991 | 448.23 million | +0.1% |
| 1992 | 448.35 million | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 448.24 million | -0.0% |
| 1994 | 448.33 million | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 448.44 million | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 448.42 million | -0.0% |
| 1997 | 448.27 million | -0.0% |
| 1998 | 448.08 million | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 447.81 million | -0.1% |
| 2000 | 447.45 million | -0.1% |
| 2001 | 447.36 million | -0.0% |
| 2002 | 446.51 million | -0.2% |
| 2003 | 445.01 million | -0.3% |
| 2004 | 443.25 million | -0.4% |
| 2005 | 440.98 million | -0.5% |
| 2006 | 438.22 million | -0.6% |
| 2007 | 435.19 million | -0.7% |
| 2008 | 431.91 million | -0.8% |
| 2009 | 428.39 million | -0.8% |
| 2010 | 424.54 million | -0.9% |
| 2011 | 420.83 million | -0.9% |
| 2012 | 416.83 million | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 413.44 million | -0.8% |
| 2014 | 411.31 million | -0.5% |
| 2015 | 409.38 million | -0.5% |
| 2016 | 407.52 million | -0.5% |
| 2017 | 405.96 million | -0.4% |
| 2018 | 404.40 million | -0.4% |
| 2019 | 403.07 million | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 401.89 million | -0.3% |
| 2021 | 400.78 million | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 399.78 million | -0.2% |
| 2023 | 398.89 million | -0.2% |
| 2024 | 398.10 million | -0.2% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 398.10 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 21% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 398.10 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 93% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +101.0% | 1.81 million | 3.63 million |
| 1852 | +50.6% | 3.63 million | 5.46 million |
| 1853 | +33.7% | 5.46 million | 7.31 million |
| 1854 | +25.3% | 7.31 million | 9.16 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 10.11 million | 1.81 million | 18.48 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 29.14 million | 20.38 million | 37.97 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 49.23 million | 39.97 million | 58.57 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 70.47 million | 60.70 million | 80.33 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 92.93 million | 82.58 million | 103.36 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 116.71 million | 105.74 million | 127.76 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 141.84 million | 130.28 million | 153.49 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 168.37 million | 156.15 million | 180.69 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 196.04 million | 183.47 million | 208.60 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 225.31 million | 211.52 million | 239.33 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 315.18 million | 248.27 million | 395.96 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 429.66 million | 408.86 million | 439.29 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 443.46 million | 440.21 million | 445.63 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 448.16 million | 446.15 million | 449.72 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 448.20 million | 447.81 million | 448.44 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 440.43 million | 428.39 million | 447.45 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 411.73 million | 403.07 million | 424.54 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 399.89 million | 398.10 million | 401.89 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More climate change data for Uzbekistan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 974.02 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 23,306 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,291 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 18,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 643.38 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 6,140 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,778 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 362.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 21.8 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Uzbekistan was 398.10 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 449.72 million in 1987.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.81 million in 1850.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Uzbekistan ranks 115th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).