Cumulative co2 land use in East Timor
East Timor: Cumulative co2 land use was 383.76 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
383.76 million
Change on year
up 1.0%
World rank
118th
of 197 countries
All-time high
383.76 million
in 2024
All-time low
1.11 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in East Timor, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in East Timor is 383.76 million, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
The figure is up 1.0% on the previous year and up 11.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in East Timor peaked at 383.76 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 1.11 million, in 1850.
East Timor ranks 118th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in East Timor, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 1.11 million | — |
| 1851 | 2.33 million | +109.4% |
| 1852 | 3.48 million | +49.0% |
| 1853 | 4.91 million | +41.2% |
| 1854 | 6.13 million | +24.8% |
| 1855 | 7.41 million | +20.9% |
| 1856 | 8.92 million | +20.5% |
| 1857 | 10.48 million | +17.4% |
| 1858 | 11.90 million | +13.5% |
| 1859 | 13.40 million | +12.6% |
| 1860 | 15.34 million | +14.5% |
| 1861 | 16.52 million | +7.7% |
| 1862 | 17.47 million | +5.7% |
| 1863 | 18.30 million | +4.8% |
| 1864 | 19.48 million | +6.4% |
| 1865 | 20.34 million | +4.5% |
| 1866 | 21.11 million | +3.8% |
| 1867 | 21.98 million | +4.1% |
| 1868 | 22.73 million | +3.4% |
| 1869 | 23.87 million | +5.0% |
| 1870 | 24.70 million | +3.5% |
| 1871 | 25.45 million | +3.0% |
| 1872 | 26.15 million | +2.8% |
| 1873 | 27.16 million | +3.9% |
| 1874 | 27.93 million | +2.9% |
| 1875 | 28.64 million | +2.5% |
| 1876 | 29.32 million | +2.4% |
| 1877 | 29.98 million | +2.3% |
| 1878 | 30.99 million | +3.4% |
| 1879 | 31.76 million | +2.5% |
| 1880 | 32.52 million | +2.4% |
| 1881 | 33.27 million | +2.3% |
| 1882 | 34.02 million | +2.2% |
| 1883 | 34.76 million | +2.2% |
| 1884 | 35.67 million | +2.6% |
| 1885 | 36.46 million | +2.2% |
| 1886 | 37.23 million | +2.1% |
| 1887 | 37.98 million | +2.0% |
| 1888 | 38.73 million | +2.0% |
| 1889 | 39.48 million | +1.9% |
| 1890 | 40.23 million | +1.9% |
| 1891 | 40.98 million | +1.9% |
| 1892 | 41.74 million | +1.9% |
| 1893 | 42.99 million | +3.0% |
| 1894 | 43.92 million | +2.2% |
| 1895 | 44.77 million | +1.9% |
| 1896 | 45.59 million | +1.8% |
| 1897 | 46.39 million | +1.8% |
| 1898 | 47.89 million | +3.2% |
| 1899 | 48.92 million | +2.1% |
| 1900 | 49.82 million | +1.8% |
| 1901 | 50.67 million | +1.7% |
| 1902 | 51.49 million | +1.6% |
| 1903 | 52.29 million | +1.6% |
| 1904 | 53.09 million | +1.5% |
| 1905 | 53.88 million | +1.5% |
| 1906 | 54.66 million | +1.5% |
| 1907 | 55.45 million | +1.4% |
| 1908 | 56.23 million | +1.4% |
| 1909 | 57.01 million | +1.4% |
| 1910 | 57.99 million | +1.7% |
| 1911 | 58.85 million | +1.5% |
| 1912 | 59.67 million | +1.4% |
| 1913 | 60.48 million | +1.4% |
| 1914 | 61.29 million | +1.3% |
| 1915 | 62.10 million | +1.3% |
| 1916 | 62.90 million | +1.3% |
| 1917 | 63.70 million | +1.3% |
| 1918 | 64.51 million | +1.3% |
| 1919 | 65.31 million | +1.2% |
| 1920 | 66.18 million | +1.3% |
| 1921 | 67.08 million | +1.4% |
| 1922 | 68.02 million | +1.4% |
| 1923 | 69.00 million | +1.4% |
| 1924 | 70.02 million | +1.5% |
| 1925 | 71.29 million | +1.8% |
| 1926 | 72.46 million | +1.6% |
| 1927 | 73.64 million | +1.6% |
| 1928 | 74.85 million | +1.6% |
| 1929 | 76.09 million | +1.7% |
| 1930 | 77.47 million | +1.8% |
| 1931 | 78.93 million | +1.9% |
| 1932 | 80.69 million | +2.2% |
| 1933 | 82.35 million | +2.1% |
| 1934 | 84.28 million | +2.3% |
| 1935 | 86.08 million | +2.1% |
| 1936 | 87.89 million | +2.1% |
| 1937 | 90.00 million | +2.4% |
| 1938 | 91.96 million | +2.2% |
| 1939 | 94.23 million | +2.5% |
| 1940 | 96.22 million | +2.1% |
| 1941 | 98.17 million | +2.0% |
| 1942 | 100.10 million | +2.0% |
| 1943 | 102.05 million | +1.9% |
| 1944 | 104.02 million | +1.9% |
| 1945 | 106.02 million | +1.9% |
| 1946 | 108.04 million | +1.9% |
| 1947 | 110.09 million | +1.9% |
| 1948 | 112.17 million | +1.9% |
| 1949 | 113.57 million | +1.2% |
| 1950 | 114.48 million | +0.8% |
| 1951 | 115.63 million | +1.0% |
| 1952 | 117.54 million | +1.6% |
| 1953 | 118.71 million | +1.0% |
| 1954 | 120.22 million | +1.3% |
| 1955 | 122.73 million | +2.1% |
| 1956 | 124.38 million | +1.3% |
| 1957 | 125.80 million | +1.1% |
| 1958 | 127.14 million | +1.1% |
| 1959 | 126.07 million | -0.8% |
| 1960 | 125.19 million | -0.7% |
| 1961 | 124.51 million | -0.5% |
| 1962 | 123.99 million | -0.4% |
| 1963 | 123.60 million | -0.3% |
| 1964 | 123.33 million | -0.2% |
| 1965 | 123.19 million | -0.1% |
| 1966 | 123.93 million | +0.6% |
| 1967 | 124.38 million | +0.4% |
| 1968 | 125.08 million | +0.6% |
| 1969 | 129.11 million | +3.2% |
| 1970 | 131.12 million | +1.6% |
| 1971 | 133.95 million | +2.2% |
| 1972 | 138.72 million | +3.6% |
| 1973 | 142.84 million | +3.0% |
| 1974 | 148.34 million | +3.8% |
| 1975 | 153.49 million | +3.5% |
| 1976 | 158.90 million | +3.5% |
| 1977 | 166.18 million | +4.6% |
| 1978 | 172.71 million | +3.9% |
| 1979 | 179.08 million | +3.7% |
| 1980 | 184.86 million | +3.2% |
| 1981 | 190.00 million | +2.8% |
| 1982 | 195.26 million | +2.8% |
| 1983 | 200.37 million | +2.6% |
| 1984 | 206.32 million | +3.0% |
| 1985 | 212.50 million | +3.0% |
| 1986 | 219.09 million | +3.1% |
| 1987 | 225.48 million | +2.9% |
| 1988 | 230.62 million | +2.3% |
| 1989 | 239.11 million | +3.7% |
| 1990 | 250.97 million | +5.0% |
| 1991 | 259.05 million | +3.2% |
| 1992 | 266.50 million | +2.9% |
| 1993 | 274.59 million | +3.0% |
| 1994 | 280.24 million | +2.1% |
| 1995 | 285.17 million | +1.8% |
| 1996 | 289.26 million | +1.4% |
| 1997 | 292.28 million | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 294.94 million | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 298.08 million | +1.1% |
| 2000 | 301.02 million | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 303.82 million | +0.9% |
| 2002 | 306.93 million | +1.0% |
| 2003 | 309.81 million | +0.9% |
| 2004 | 312.38 million | +0.8% |
| 2005 | 314.64 million | +0.7% |
| 2006 | 316.95 million | +0.7% |
| 2007 | 320.50 million | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 323.48 million | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 326.13 million | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 330.05 million | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 334.15 million | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 337.60 million | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 341.07 million | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 344.31 million | +1.0% |
| 2015 | 347.33 million | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 350.35 million | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 355.18 million | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 358.59 million | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 362.26 million | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 366.62 million | +1.2% |
| 2021 | 372.19 million | +1.5% |
| 2022 | 376.20 million | +1.1% |
| 2023 | 380.00 million | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 383.76 million | +1.0% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 383.76 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 20% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 383.76 million is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1.03 billion, 37% of the median. (30 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in East Timor changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +109.4% | 1.11 million | 2.33 million |
| 1852 | +49.0% | 2.33 million | 3.48 million |
| 1853 | +41.2% | 3.48 million | 4.91 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 7.01 million | 1.11 million | 13.40 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 19.71 million | 15.34 million | 23.87 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 28.21 million | 24.70 million | 31.76 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 36.01 million | 32.52 million | 39.48 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 44.34 million | 40.23 million | 48.92 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 53.46 million | 49.82 million | 57.01 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 61.68 million | 57.99 million | 65.31 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 70.86 million | 66.18 million | 76.09 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 85.39 million | 77.47 million | 94.23 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 105.05 million | 96.22 million | 113.57 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 121.27 million | 114.48 million | 127.14 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 124.63 million | 123.19 million | 129.11 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 152.53 million | 131.12 million | 179.08 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 210.36 million | 184.86 million | 239.11 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 279.11 million | 250.97 million | 298.08 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 313.56 million | 301.02 million | 326.13 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 346.09 million | 330.05 million | 362.26 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 375.75 million | 366.62 million | 383.76 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
More climate change data for East Timor
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 934.91 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 229.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 704.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.8677 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 259.51 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 20.09 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 239.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 8.55 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in East Timor?
- Cumulative co2 land use in East Timor was 383.76 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 383.76 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.11 million in 1850.
- How does East Timor rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- East Timor ranks 118th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).