Cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica
Jamaica: Cumulative co2 land use was 363.32 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
363.32 million
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
121st
of 197 countries
All-time high
366.01 million
in 2017
All-time low
382,815
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Jamaica recorded 363.32 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024.
The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica peaked at 366.01 million in 2017 and was at its lowest, 382,815, in 1850.
Jamaica ranks 121st of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 382,815 | — |
| 1851 | 878,920 | +129.6% |
| 1852 | 1.31 million | +48.6% |
| 1853 | 1.79 million | +37.1% |
| 1854 | 2.29 million | +28.1% |
| 1855 | 2.82 million | +22.7% |
| 1856 | 3.21 million | +13.8% |
| 1857 | 3.66 million | +14.3% |
| 1858 | 4.23 million | +15.4% |
| 1859 | 4.66 million | +10.3% |
| 1860 | 5.46 million | +17.1% |
| 1861 | 6.29 million | +15.1% |
| 1862 | 7.15 million | +13.7% |
| 1863 | 8.09 million | +13.2% |
| 1864 | 9.07 million | +12.1% |
| 1865 | 10.09 million | +11.2% |
| 1866 | 11.42 million | +13.2% |
| 1867 | 12.40 million | +8.6% |
| 1868 | 13.41 million | +8.2% |
| 1869 | 14.56 million | +8.6% |
| 1870 | 15.67 million | +7.6% |
| 1871 | 16.78 million | +7.1% |
| 1872 | 17.89 million | +6.6% |
| 1873 | 19.06 million | +6.5% |
| 1874 | 20.30 million | +6.5% |
| 1875 | 21.58 million | +6.3% |
| 1876 | 22.89 million | +6.0% |
| 1877 | 24.19 million | +5.7% |
| 1878 | 25.56 million | +5.6% |
| 1879 | 26.87 million | +5.1% |
| 1880 | 28.27 million | +5.2% |
| 1881 | 29.78 million | +5.3% |
| 1882 | 31.20 million | +4.8% |
| 1883 | 32.62 million | +4.5% |
| 1884 | 34.14 million | +4.6% |
| 1885 | 35.67 million | +4.5% |
| 1886 | 37.14 million | +4.1% |
| 1887 | 38.65 million | +4.0% |
| 1888 | 40.18 million | +4.0% |
| 1889 | 41.76 million | +3.9% |
| 1890 | 42.44 million | +1.6% |
| 1891 | 42.63 million | +0.4% |
| 1892 | 42.39 million | -0.6% |
| 1893 | 41.70 million | -1.6% |
| 1894 | 40.87 million | -2.0% |
| 1895 | 39.84 million | -2.5% |
| 1896 | 38.58 million | -3.1% |
| 1897 | 37.03 million | -4.0% |
| 1898 | 35.19 million | -5.0% |
| 1899 | 33.30 million | -5.4% |
| 1900 | 32.46 million | -2.5% |
| 1901 | 32.02 million | -1.4% |
| 1902 | 31.87 million | -0.5% |
| 1903 | 31.92 million | +0.2% |
| 1904 | 32.37 million | +1.4% |
| 1905 | 32.77 million | +1.2% |
| 1906 | 33.38 million | +1.9% |
| 1907 | 34.01 million | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 34.77 million | +2.2% |
| 1909 | 35.69 million | +2.7% |
| 1910 | 36.84 million | +3.2% |
| 1911 | 38.04 million | +3.2% |
| 1912 | 39.40 million | +3.6% |
| 1913 | 40.76 million | +3.4% |
| 1914 | 42.31 million | +3.8% |
| 1915 | 44.02 million | +4.1% |
| 1916 | 45.82 million | +4.1% |
| 1917 | 47.77 million | +4.3% |
| 1918 | 49.74 million | +4.1% |
| 1919 | 51.73 million | +4.0% |
| 1920 | 54.44 million | +5.2% |
| 1921 | 57.56 million | +5.7% |
| 1922 | 60.86 million | +5.7% |
| 1923 | 64.41 million | +5.8% |
| 1924 | 67.85 million | +5.4% |
| 1925 | 71.35 million | +5.2% |
| 1926 | 75.02 million | +5.1% |
| 1927 | 78.73 million | +4.9% |
| 1928 | 82.48 million | +4.8% |
| 1929 | 86.27 million | +4.6% |
| 1930 | 90.66 million | +5.1% |
| 1931 | 95.27 million | +5.1% |
| 1932 | 99.98 million | +4.9% |
| 1933 | 104.99 million | +5.0% |
| 1934 | 110.03 million | +4.8% |
| 1935 | 114.93 million | +4.5% |
| 1936 | 119.90 million | +4.3% |
| 1937 | 124.94 million | +4.2% |
| 1938 | 129.96 million | +4.0% |
| 1939 | 134.96 million | +3.8% |
| 1940 | 140.25 million | +3.9% |
| 1941 | 145.62 million | +3.8% |
| 1942 | 151.10 million | +3.8% |
| 1943 | 156.71 million | +3.7% |
| 1944 | 162.24 million | +3.5% |
| 1945 | 167.63 million | +3.3% |
| 1946 | 173.11 million | +3.3% |
| 1947 | 178.63 million | +3.2% |
| 1948 | 184.14 million | +3.1% |
| 1949 | 189.66 million | +3.0% |
| 1950 | 194.25 million | +2.4% |
| 1951 | 198.24 million | +2.1% |
| 1952 | 202.13 million | +2.0% |
| 1953 | 205.71 million | +1.8% |
| 1954 | 209.57 million | +1.9% |
| 1955 | 213.21 million | +1.7% |
| 1956 | 216.74 million | +1.7% |
| 1957 | 220.30 million | +1.6% |
| 1958 | 223.90 million | +1.6% |
| 1959 | 227.74 million | +1.7% |
| 1960 | 229.61 million | +0.8% |
| 1961 | 230.75 million | +0.5% |
| 1962 | 231.77 million | +0.4% |
| 1963 | 232.54 million | +0.3% |
| 1964 | 232.08 million | -0.2% |
| 1965 | 232.11 million | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 232.02 million | -0.0% |
| 1967 | 231.90 million | -0.0% |
| 1968 | 232.08 million | +0.1% |
| 1969 | 231.81 million | -0.1% |
| 1970 | 231.82 million | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 231.97 million | +0.1% |
| 1972 | 232.06 million | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 232.22 million | +0.1% |
| 1974 | 232.42 million | +0.1% |
| 1975 | 232.66 million | +0.1% |
| 1976 | 232.99 million | +0.1% |
| 1977 | 233.47 million | +0.2% |
| 1978 | 233.37 million | -0.0% |
| 1979 | 233.59 million | +0.1% |
| 1980 | 233.98 million | +0.2% |
| 1981 | 233.87 million | -0.0% |
| 1982 | 233.49 million | -0.2% |
| 1983 | 233.40 million | -0.0% |
| 1984 | 233.42 million | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 233.81 million | +0.2% |
| 1986 | 234.27 million | +0.2% |
| 1987 | 234.89 million | +0.3% |
| 1988 | 235.61 million | +0.3% |
| 1989 | 236.28 million | +0.3% |
| 1990 | 238.75 million | +1.0% |
| 1991 | 242.43 million | +1.5% |
| 1992 | 253.55 million | +4.6% |
| 1993 | 258.33 million | +1.9% |
| 1994 | 263.15 million | +1.9% |
| 1995 | 265.67 million | +1.0% |
| 1996 | 269.85 million | +1.6% |
| 1997 | 272.52 million | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 275.09 million | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 291.98 million | +6.1% |
| 2000 | 300.73 million | +3.0% |
| 2001 | 305.48 million | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 311.28 million | +1.9% |
| 2003 | 314.86 million | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 318.50 million | +1.2% |
| 2005 | 321.10 million | +0.8% |
| 2006 | 329.82 million | +2.7% |
| 2007 | 339.86 million | +3.0% |
| 2008 | 350.76 million | +3.2% |
| 2009 | 354.48 million | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 356.57 million | +0.6% |
| 2011 | 359.60 million | +0.8% |
| 2012 | 361.96 million | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 363.74 million | +0.5% |
| 2014 | 364.48 million | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 365.14 million | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 365.47 million | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 366.01 million | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 365.91 million | -0.0% |
| 2019 | 365.57 million | -0.1% |
| 2020 | 365.11 million | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 364.56 million | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 364.12 million | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 363.71 million | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 363.32 million | -0.1% |
Jamaica compared with similar countries
- Jamaica's 363.32 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 58% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Jamaica's 363.32 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1.63 billion, 22% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +129.6% | 382,815 | 878,920 |
| 1852 | +48.6% | 878,920 | 1.31 million |
| 1853 | +37.1% | 1.31 million | 1.79 million |
| 1854 | +28.1% | 1.79 million | 2.29 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.52 million | 382,815 | 4.66 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 9.79 million | 5.46 million | 14.56 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 21.08 million | 15.67 million | 26.87 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 34.94 million | 28.27 million | 41.76 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 39.40 million | 33.30 million | 42.63 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 33.12 million | 31.87 million | 35.69 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 43.64 million | 36.84 million | 51.73 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 69.90 million | 54.44 million | 86.27 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 112.56 million | 90.66 million | 134.96 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 164.91 million | 140.25 million | 189.66 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 211.18 million | 194.25 million | 227.74 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 231.67 million | 229.61 million | 232.54 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 232.66 million | 231.82 million | 233.59 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 234.30 million | 233.40 million | 236.28 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 263.13 million | 238.75 million | 291.98 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 324.69 million | 300.73 million | 354.48 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 363.44 million | 356.57 million | 366.01 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 364.16 million | 363.32 million | 365.11 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Jamaica
- 118 East Timor 383.76 million compare
- 119 Egypt 377.65 million compare
- 120 Kyrgyzstan 371.81 million compare
- 122 South Korea 362.63 million compare
- 123 Namibia 359.14 million compare
- 124 Guinea-Bissau 314.21 million compare
More climate change data for Jamaica
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 6.29 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 927.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 280.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 647.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.06 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 23.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 37.75 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 35.64 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.1345 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Jamaica was 363.32 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Jamaica?
- The highest recorded value was 366.01 million in 2017.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Jamaica?
- The lowest recorded value was 382,815 in 1850.
- How does Jamaica rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Jamaica ranks 121st out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Jamaica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Jamaica data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).