Cumulative co2 land use in Namibia
Namibia: Cumulative co2 land use was 359.14 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
359.14 million
Change on year
up 1.3%
World rank
123rd
of 197 countries
All-time high
359.14 million
in 2024
All-time low
54,227
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Namibia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Namibia is 359.14 million, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 15.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Namibia peaked at 359.14 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 54,227, in 1850.
Namibia ranks 123rd of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Namibia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 54,227 | — |
| 1851 | 166,859 | +207.7% |
| 1852 | 325,253 | +94.9% |
| 1853 | 511,788 | +57.4% |
| 1854 | 722,577 | +41.2% |
| 1855 | 954,142 | +32.0% |
| 1856 | 1.20 million | +26.2% |
| 1857 | 1.47 million | +22.1% |
| 1858 | 1.75 million | +19.0% |
| 1859 | 2.05 million | +17.0% |
| 1860 | 2.37 million | +15.7% |
| 1861 | 2.71 million | +14.3% |
| 1862 | 3.06 million | +13.1% |
| 1863 | 3.43 million | +12.0% |
| 1864 | 3.80 million | +11.0% |
| 1865 | 4.19 million | +10.1% |
| 1866 | 4.58 million | +9.4% |
| 1867 | 4.98 million | +8.8% |
| 1868 | 5.40 million | +8.4% |
| 1869 | 5.82 million | +7.8% |
| 1870 | 6.24 million | +7.3% |
| 1871 | 6.68 million | +7.0% |
| 1872 | 7.12 million | +6.6% |
| 1873 | 7.57 million | +6.3% |
| 1874 | 8.02 million | +5.9% |
| 1875 | 8.47 million | +5.6% |
| 1876 | 8.93 million | +5.4% |
| 1877 | 9.39 million | +5.1% |
| 1878 | 9.85 million | +4.9% |
| 1879 | 10.31 million | +4.7% |
| 1880 | 10.80 million | +4.7% |
| 1881 | 11.30 million | +4.6% |
| 1882 | 11.81 million | +4.5% |
| 1883 | 12.33 million | +4.4% |
| 1884 | 12.85 million | +4.2% |
| 1885 | 13.38 million | +4.1% |
| 1886 | 13.91 million | +4.0% |
| 1887 | 14.44 million | +3.8% |
| 1888 | 14.98 million | +3.7% |
| 1889 | 15.52 million | +3.6% |
| 1890 | 16.06 million | +3.5% |
| 1891 | 16.60 million | +3.3% |
| 1892 | 17.13 million | +3.2% |
| 1893 | 17.66 million | +3.1% |
| 1894 | 18.19 million | +3.0% |
| 1895 | 18.71 million | +2.9% |
| 1896 | 19.23 million | +2.8% |
| 1897 | 19.75 million | +2.7% |
| 1898 | 20.27 million | +2.6% |
| 1899 | 20.79 million | +2.5% |
| 1900 | 21.42 million | +3.0% |
| 1901 | 22.12 million | +3.3% |
| 1902 | 22.86 million | +3.4% |
| 1903 | 23.63 million | +3.4% |
| 1904 | 24.44 million | +3.4% |
| 1905 | 25.26 million | +3.4% |
| 1906 | 26.09 million | +3.3% |
| 1907 | 26.94 million | +3.3% |
| 1908 | 27.80 million | +3.2% |
| 1909 | 28.68 million | +3.1% |
| 1910 | 29.59 million | +3.2% |
| 1911 | 30.54 million | +3.2% |
| 1912 | 31.51 million | +3.2% |
| 1913 | 32.51 million | +3.2% |
| 1914 | 33.51 million | +3.1% |
| 1915 | 34.53 million | +3.0% |
| 1916 | 35.56 million | +3.0% |
| 1917 | 36.59 million | +2.9% |
| 1918 | 37.64 million | +2.9% |
| 1919 | 38.69 million | +2.8% |
| 1920 | 39.99 million | +3.4% |
| 1921 | 41.45 million | +3.6% |
| 1922 | 43.01 million | +3.8% |
| 1923 | 44.68 million | +3.9% |
| 1924 | 46.41 million | +3.9% |
| 1925 | 48.21 million | +3.9% |
| 1926 | 50.08 million | +3.9% |
| 1927 | 51.99 million | +3.8% |
| 1928 | 53.96 million | +3.8% |
| 1929 | 55.97 million | +3.7% |
| 1930 | 58.12 million | +3.8% |
| 1931 | 60.38 million | +3.9% |
| 1932 | 62.70 million | +3.8% |
| 1933 | 65.08 million | +3.8% |
| 1934 | 67.53 million | +3.8% |
| 1935 | 70.02 million | +3.7% |
| 1936 | 72.57 million | +3.6% |
| 1937 | 75.16 million | +3.6% |
| 1938 | 77.80 million | +3.5% |
| 1939 | 80.47 million | +3.4% |
| 1940 | 83.37 million | +3.6% |
| 1941 | 86.43 million | +3.7% |
| 1942 | 89.60 million | +3.7% |
| 1943 | 92.86 million | +3.6% |
| 1944 | 96.20 million | +3.6% |
| 1945 | 99.62 million | +3.6% |
| 1946 | 103.09 million | +3.5% |
| 1947 | 106.63 million | +3.4% |
| 1948 | 110.24 million | +3.4% |
| 1949 | 113.88 million | +3.3% |
| 1950 | 117.45 million | +3.1% |
| 1951 | 121.05 million | +3.1% |
| 1952 | 124.74 million | +3.0% |
| 1953 | 128.53 million | +3.0% |
| 1954 | 132.45 million | +3.1% |
| 1955 | 136.42 million | +3.0% |
| 1956 | 140.50 million | +3.0% |
| 1957 | 144.74 million | +3.0% |
| 1958 | 149.11 million | +3.0% |
| 1959 | 153.66 million | +3.1% |
| 1960 | 160.43 million | +4.4% |
| 1961 | 164.86 million | +2.8% |
| 1962 | 168.28 million | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 171.41 million | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 174.12 million | +1.6% |
| 1965 | 176.59 million | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 179.17 million | +1.5% |
| 1967 | 181.59 million | +1.3% |
| 1968 | 183.91 million | +1.3% |
| 1969 | 186.25 million | +1.3% |
| 1970 | 188.60 million | +1.3% |
| 1971 | 190.80 million | +1.2% |
| 1972 | 192.90 million | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 194.94 million | +1.1% |
| 1974 | 196.91 million | +1.0% |
| 1975 | 198.84 million | +1.0% |
| 1976 | 200.68 million | +0.9% |
| 1977 | 202.49 million | +0.9% |
| 1978 | 204.22 million | +0.9% |
| 1979 | 205.99 million | +0.9% |
| 1980 | 207.72 million | +0.8% |
| 1981 | 209.44 million | +0.8% |
| 1982 | 211.49 million | +1.0% |
| 1983 | 213.41 million | +0.9% |
| 1984 | 215.28 million | +0.9% |
| 1985 | 217.13 million | +0.9% |
| 1986 | 218.97 million | +0.8% |
| 1987 | 220.82 million | +0.8% |
| 1988 | 222.69 million | +0.8% |
| 1989 | 224.57 million | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 226.49 million | +0.9% |
| 1991 | 228.41 million | +0.8% |
| 1992 | 232.50 million | +1.8% |
| 1993 | 238.58 million | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 247.41 million | +3.7% |
| 1995 | 253.19 million | +2.3% |
| 1996 | 257.53 million | +1.7% |
| 1997 | 261.05 million | +1.4% |
| 1998 | 264.03 million | +1.1% |
| 1999 | 266.62 million | +1.0% |
| 2000 | 269.18 million | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 271.76 million | +1.0% |
| 2002 | 274.35 million | +1.0% |
| 2003 | 276.71 million | +0.9% |
| 2004 | 279.18 million | +0.9% |
| 2005 | 281.74 million | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 284.02 million | +0.8% |
| 2007 | 286.56 million | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 290.17 million | +1.3% |
| 2009 | 293.88 million | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 297.98 million | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 301.61 million | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 305.25 million | +1.2% |
| 2013 | 308.83 million | +1.2% |
| 2014 | 312.35 million | +1.1% |
| 2015 | 316.11 million | +1.2% |
| 2016 | 319.79 million | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 323.38 million | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 327.08 million | +1.1% |
| 2019 | 331.38 million | +1.3% |
| 2020 | 336.41 million | +1.5% |
| 2021 | 341.99 million | +1.7% |
| 2022 | 348.51 million | +1.9% |
| 2023 | 354.49 million | +1.7% |
| 2024 | 359.14 million | +1.3% |
Namibia compared with similar countries
- Namibia's 359.14 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 19% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Namibia's 359.14 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 23% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Namibia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +207.7% | 54,227 | 166,859 |
| 1852 | +94.9% | 166,859 | 325,253 |
| 1853 | +57.4% | 325,253 | 511,788 |
| 1854 | +41.2% | 511,788 | 722,577 |
| 1855 | +32.0% | 722,577 | 954,142 |
| 1856 | +26.2% | 954,142 | 1.20 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 920,324 | 54,227 | 2.05 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 4.03 million | 2.37 million | 5.82 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 8.26 million | 6.24 million | 10.31 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 13.13 million | 10.80 million | 15.52 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 18.44 million | 16.06 million | 20.79 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 24.92 million | 21.42 million | 28.68 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 34.07 million | 29.59 million | 38.69 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 47.57 million | 39.99 million | 55.97 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 68.98 million | 58.12 million | 80.47 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 98.19 million | 83.37 million | 113.88 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 134.86 million | 117.45 million | 153.66 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 174.66 million | 160.43 million | 186.25 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 197.64 million | 188.60 million | 205.99 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 216.15 million | 207.72 million | 224.57 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 247.58 million | 226.49 million | 266.62 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 280.75 million | 269.18 million | 293.88 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 314.37 million | 297.98 million | 331.38 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 348.11 million | 336.41 million | 359.14 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
- 120 Kyrgyzstan 371.81 million compare
- 121 Jamaica 363.32 million compare
- 122 South Korea 362.63 million compare
- 124 Guinea-Bissau 314.21 million compare
- 125 Eswatini 297.29 million compare
- 126 Botswana 286.35 million compare
More climate change data for Namibia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 5.64 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,137 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,753 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,384 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 6.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 120.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 57.2 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 54.43 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2054 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Namibia?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Namibia was 359.14 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 359.14 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 54,227 in 1850.
- How does Namibia rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Namibia ranks 123rd out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).