Cumulative co2 land use in Botswana
Botswana: Cumulative co2 land use was 286.35 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
286.35 million
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
126th
of 197 countries
All-time high
289.92 million
in 2014
All-time low
292,497
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Botswana, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cumulative co2 land use in Botswana is 286.35 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 1.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Botswana peaked at 289.92 million in 2014 and was at its lowest, 292,497, in 1850.
That places Botswana 126th out of 197 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Botswana, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 292,497 | — |
| 1851 | 618,740 | +111.5% |
| 1852 | 967,662 | +56.4% |
| 1853 | 1.33 million | +37.7% |
| 1854 | 1.71 million | +28.3% |
| 1855 | 2.10 million | +22.6% |
| 1856 | 2.49 million | +18.8% |
| 1857 | 2.89 million | +16.0% |
| 1858 | 3.29 million | +14.0% |
| 1859 | 3.70 million | +12.4% |
| 1860 | 4.13 million | +11.7% |
| 1861 | 4.58 million | +10.9% |
| 1862 | 5.04 million | +10.1% |
| 1863 | 5.51 million | +9.3% |
| 1864 | 5.99 million | +8.6% |
| 1865 | 6.47 million | +8.0% |
| 1866 | 6.96 million | +7.5% |
| 1867 | 7.45 million | +7.0% |
| 1868 | 7.94 million | +6.6% |
| 1869 | 8.44 million | +6.2% |
| 1870 | 8.94 million | +6.0% |
| 1871 | 9.45 million | +5.7% |
| 1872 | 9.97 million | +5.4% |
| 1873 | 10.48 million | +5.2% |
| 1874 | 11.01 million | +5.0% |
| 1875 | 11.53 million | +4.8% |
| 1876 | 12.05 million | +4.6% |
| 1877 | 12.58 million | +4.4% |
| 1878 | 13.11 million | +4.2% |
| 1879 | 13.64 million | +4.0% |
| 1880 | 14.16 million | +3.8% |
| 1881 | 14.68 million | +3.7% |
| 1882 | 15.20 million | +3.5% |
| 1883 | 15.72 million | +3.4% |
| 1884 | 16.23 million | +3.3% |
| 1885 | 16.75 million | +3.2% |
| 1886 | 17.26 million | +3.1% |
| 1887 | 17.78 million | +3.0% |
| 1888 | 18.29 million | +2.9% |
| 1889 | 18.81 million | +2.8% |
| 1890 | 19.35 million | +2.9% |
| 1891 | 19.92 million | +2.9% |
| 1892 | 20.50 million | +2.9% |
| 1893 | 21.09 million | +2.9% |
| 1894 | 21.68 million | +2.8% |
| 1895 | 22.28 million | +2.8% |
| 1896 | 22.88 million | +2.7% |
| 1897 | 23.49 million | +2.6% |
| 1898 | 24.10 million | +2.6% |
| 1899 | 24.71 million | +2.5% |
| 1900 | 25.40 million | +2.8% |
| 1901 | 26.14 million | +2.9% |
| 1902 | 26.91 million | +3.0% |
| 1903 | 27.71 million | +3.0% |
| 1904 | 28.52 million | +2.9% |
| 1905 | 29.35 million | +2.9% |
| 1906 | 30.18 million | +2.8% |
| 1907 | 31.02 million | +2.8% |
| 1908 | 31.87 million | +2.7% |
| 1909 | 32.73 million | +2.7% |
| 1910 | 33.61 million | +2.7% |
| 1911 | 34.50 million | +2.7% |
| 1912 | 35.40 million | +2.6% |
| 1913 | 36.31 million | +2.6% |
| 1914 | 37.23 million | +2.5% |
| 1915 | 38.16 million | +2.5% |
| 1916 | 39.09 million | +2.4% |
| 1917 | 40.02 million | +2.4% |
| 1918 | 40.95 million | +2.3% |
| 1919 | 41.89 million | +2.3% |
| 1920 | 42.96 million | +2.6% |
| 1921 | 44.13 million | +2.7% |
| 1922 | 45.36 million | +2.8% |
| 1923 | 46.66 million | +2.9% |
| 1924 | 48.00 million | +2.9% |
| 1925 | 49.39 million | +2.9% |
| 1926 | 50.83 million | +2.9% |
| 1927 | 52.30 million | +2.9% |
| 1928 | 53.81 million | +2.9% |
| 1929 | 55.35 million | +2.9% |
| 1930 | 56.99 million | +3.0% |
| 1931 | 58.70 million | +3.0% |
| 1932 | 60.47 million | +3.0% |
| 1933 | 62.28 million | +3.0% |
| 1934 | 64.14 million | +3.0% |
| 1935 | 66.04 million | +3.0% |
| 1936 | 67.98 million | +2.9% |
| 1937 | 69.95 million | +2.9% |
| 1938 | 71.96 million | +2.9% |
| 1939 | 74.00 million | +2.8% |
| 1940 | 76.42 million | +3.3% |
| 1941 | 79.07 million | +3.5% |
| 1942 | 81.90 million | +3.6% |
| 1943 | 84.86 million | +3.6% |
| 1944 | 87.93 million | +3.6% |
| 1945 | 91.09 million | +3.6% |
| 1946 | 94.33 million | +3.6% |
| 1947 | 97.64 million | +3.5% |
| 1948 | 101.03 million | +3.5% |
| 1949 | 104.48 million | +3.4% |
| 1950 | 108.06 million | +3.4% |
| 1951 | 111.56 million | +3.2% |
| 1952 | 114.97 million | +3.1% |
| 1953 | 118.31 million | +2.9% |
| 1954 | 121.58 million | +2.8% |
| 1955 | 124.83 million | +2.7% |
| 1956 | 128.08 million | +2.6% |
| 1957 | 131.37 million | +2.6% |
| 1958 | 134.72 million | +2.5% |
| 1959 | 138.16 million | +2.6% |
| 1960 | 141.76 million | +2.6% |
| 1961 | 145.01 million | +2.3% |
| 1962 | 148.09 million | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 151.06 million | +2.0% |
| 1964 | 153.97 million | +1.9% |
| 1965 | 156.81 million | +1.8% |
| 1966 | 159.81 million | +1.9% |
| 1967 | 162.83 million | +1.9% |
| 1968 | 165.86 million | +1.9% |
| 1969 | 168.85 million | +1.8% |
| 1970 | 171.78 million | +1.7% |
| 1971 | 174.71 million | +1.7% |
| 1972 | 177.51 million | +1.6% |
| 1973 | 180.17 million | +1.5% |
| 1974 | 182.71 million | +1.4% |
| 1975 | 185.17 million | +1.4% |
| 1976 | 187.55 million | +1.3% |
| 1977 | 189.82 million | +1.2% |
| 1978 | 192.12 million | +1.2% |
| 1979 | 194.35 million | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 196.57 million | +1.1% |
| 1981 | 198.89 million | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 201.16 million | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 203.40 million | +1.1% |
| 1984 | 205.65 million | +1.1% |
| 1985 | 207.88 million | +1.1% |
| 1986 | 210.16 million | +1.1% |
| 1987 | 212.44 million | +1.1% |
| 1988 | 215.11 million | +1.3% |
| 1989 | 218.07 million | +1.4% |
| 1990 | 218.45 million | +0.2% |
| 1991 | 218.08 million | -0.2% |
| 1992 | 224.20 million | +2.8% |
| 1993 | 230.57 million | +2.8% |
| 1994 | 233.66 million | +1.3% |
| 1995 | 236.61 million | +1.3% |
| 1996 | 238.13 million | +0.6% |
| 1997 | 238.02 million | -0.0% |
| 1998 | 240.17 million | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 248.96 million | +3.7% |
| 2000 | 250.69 million | +0.7% |
| 2001 | 253.75 million | +1.2% |
| 2002 | 253.97 million | +0.1% |
| 2003 | 255.51 million | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 256.00 million | +0.2% |
| 2005 | 255.98 million | -0.0% |
| 2006 | 256.29 million | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 262.07 million | +2.3% |
| 2008 | 267.77 million | +2.2% |
| 2009 | 270.72 million | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 275.94 million | +1.9% |
| 2011 | 277.61 million | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 280.25 million | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 288.64 million | +3.0% |
| 2014 | 289.92 million | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 289.85 million | -0.0% |
| 2016 | 289.71 million | -0.0% |
| 2017 | 289.35 million | -0.1% |
| 2018 | 288.75 million | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 288.16 million | -0.2% |
| 2020 | 287.61 million | -0.2% |
| 2021 | 287.14 million | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 286.80 million | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 286.55 million | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 286.35 million | -0.1% |
Botswana compared with similar countries
- Botswana's 286.35 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 629.27 million, 46% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Botswana's 286.35 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 18% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Botswana changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +111.5% | 292,497 | 618,740 |
| 1852 | +56.4% | 618,740 | 967,662 |
| 1853 | +37.7% | 967,662 | 1.33 million |
| 1854 | +28.3% | 1.33 million | 1.71 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 1.94 million | 292,497 | 3.70 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 6.25 million | 4.13 million | 8.44 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 11.28 million | 8.94 million | 13.64 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 16.49 million | 14.16 million | 18.81 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 22.00 million | 19.35 million | 24.71 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 28.98 million | 25.40 million | 32.73 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 37.72 million | 33.61 million | 41.89 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 48.88 million | 42.96 million | 55.35 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 65.25 million | 56.99 million | 74.00 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 89.88 million | 76.42 million | 104.48 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 123.16 million | 108.06 million | 138.16 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 155.41 million | 141.76 million | 168.85 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 183.59 million | 171.78 million | 194.35 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 206.93 million | 196.57 million | 218.07 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 232.69 million | 218.08 million | 248.96 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 258.27 million | 250.69 million | 270.72 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 285.82 million | 275.94 million | 289.92 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 286.89 million | 286.35 million | 287.61 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More climate change data for Botswana
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 17.55 million kg (2023)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,640 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,795 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,846 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 6.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 137.34 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 17.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 14.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0531 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Botswana?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Botswana was 286.35 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 289.92 million in 2014.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 292,497 in 1850.
- How does Botswana rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Botswana ranks 126th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).