Cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini
Eswatini: Cumulative co2 land use was 297.29 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
297.29 million
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
125th
of 197 countries
All-time high
297.29 million
in 2024
All-time low
272,968
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Eswatini recorded 297.29 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024. That is the highest value across all 175 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 1.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini peaked at 297.29 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 272,968, in 1850.
Eswatini ranks 125th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 272,968 | — |
| 1851 | 606,319 | +122.1% |
| 1852 | 957,293 | +57.9% |
| 1853 | 1.31 million | +37.3% |
| 1854 | 1.68 million | +28.0% |
| 1855 | 2.06 million | +22.4% |
| 1856 | 2.44 million | +18.7% |
| 1857 | 2.83 million | +15.9% |
| 1858 | 3.24 million | +14.3% |
| 1859 | 3.65 million | +12.7% |
| 1860 | 4.10 million | +12.4% |
| 1861 | 4.56 million | +11.3% |
| 1862 | 5.01 million | +9.9% |
| 1863 | 5.48 million | +9.4% |
| 1864 | 5.95 million | +8.6% |
| 1865 | 6.42 million | +7.9% |
| 1866 | 6.90 million | +7.4% |
| 1867 | 7.38 million | +7.0% |
| 1868 | 7.86 million | +6.4% |
| 1869 | 8.33 million | +6.0% |
| 1870 | 8.88 million | +6.6% |
| 1871 | 9.47 million | +6.7% |
| 1872 | 10.10 million | +6.6% |
| 1873 | 10.72 million | +6.1% |
| 1874 | 11.35 million | +5.9% |
| 1875 | 12.01 million | +5.8% |
| 1876 | 12.68 million | +5.6% |
| 1877 | 13.34 million | +5.2% |
| 1878 | 14.00 million | +4.9% |
| 1879 | 14.66 million | +4.7% |
| 1880 | 15.28 million | +4.2% |
| 1881 | 15.87 million | +3.9% |
| 1882 | 16.48 million | +3.8% |
| 1883 | 17.06 million | +3.5% |
| 1884 | 17.63 million | +3.4% |
| 1885 | 18.22 million | +3.3% |
| 1886 | 18.78 million | +3.1% |
| 1887 | 19.33 million | +3.0% |
| 1888 | 19.89 million | +2.8% |
| 1889 | 20.48 million | +3.0% |
| 1890 | 21.14 million | +3.2% |
| 1891 | 21.82 million | +3.2% |
| 1892 | 22.50 million | +3.1% |
| 1893 | 23.19 million | +3.1% |
| 1894 | 23.88 million | +3.0% |
| 1895 | 24.61 million | +3.0% |
| 1896 | 25.33 million | +2.9% |
| 1897 | 26.05 million | +2.9% |
| 1898 | 26.77 million | +2.8% |
| 1899 | 27.49 million | +2.7% |
| 1900 | 28.42 million | +3.4% |
| 1901 | 29.47 million | +3.7% |
| 1902 | 30.57 million | +3.7% |
| 1903 | 31.69 million | +3.7% |
| 1904 | 32.84 million | +3.6% |
| 1905 | 34.01 million | +3.6% |
| 1906 | 35.25 million | +3.6% |
| 1907 | 36.47 million | +3.5% |
| 1908 | 37.74 million | +3.5% |
| 1909 | 38.98 million | +3.3% |
| 1910 | 40.33 million | +3.4% |
| 1911 | 41.72 million | +3.5% |
| 1912 | 43.16 million | +3.4% |
| 1913 | 44.62 million | +3.4% |
| 1914 | 46.11 million | +3.3% |
| 1915 | 47.62 million | +3.3% |
| 1916 | 49.13 million | +3.2% |
| 1917 | 50.64 million | +3.1% |
| 1918 | 52.12 million | +2.9% |
| 1919 | 53.64 million | +2.9% |
| 1920 | 55.51 million | +3.5% |
| 1921 | 57.60 million | +3.8% |
| 1922 | 59.78 million | +3.8% |
| 1923 | 62.02 million | +3.7% |
| 1924 | 64.34 million | +3.7% |
| 1925 | 66.71 million | +3.7% |
| 1926 | 69.09 million | +3.6% |
| 1927 | 71.51 million | +3.5% |
| 1928 | 73.99 million | +3.5% |
| 1929 | 76.46 million | +3.3% |
| 1930 | 78.08 million | +2.1% |
| 1931 | 79.30 million | +1.6% |
| 1932 | 80.27 million | +1.2% |
| 1933 | 81.09 million | +1.0% |
| 1934 | 81.78 million | +0.9% |
| 1935 | 82.39 million | +0.7% |
| 1936 | 82.93 million | +0.7% |
| 1937 | 83.41 million | +0.6% |
| 1938 | 83.84 million | +0.5% |
| 1939 | 84.23 million | +0.5% |
| 1940 | 87.45 million | +3.8% |
| 1941 | 92.00 million | +5.2% |
| 1942 | 97.38 million | +5.9% |
| 1943 | 103.33 million | +6.1% |
| 1944 | 109.80 million | +6.3% |
| 1945 | 116.61 million | +6.2% |
| 1946 | 123.73 million | +6.1% |
| 1947 | 131.08 million | +5.9% |
| 1948 | 138.50 million | +5.7% |
| 1949 | 146.09 million | +5.5% |
| 1950 | 152.33 million | +4.3% |
| 1951 | 158.15 million | +3.8% |
| 1952 | 164.00 million | +3.7% |
| 1953 | 169.66 million | +3.5% |
| 1954 | 175.46 million | +3.4% |
| 1955 | 181.29 million | +3.3% |
| 1956 | 187.31 million | +3.3% |
| 1957 | 193.23 million | +3.2% |
| 1958 | 199.15 million | +3.1% |
| 1959 | 206.00 million | +3.4% |
| 1960 | 210.75 million | +2.3% |
| 1961 | 215.21 million | +2.1% |
| 1962 | 218.36 million | +1.5% |
| 1963 | 221.08 million | +1.2% |
| 1964 | 224.05 million | +1.3% |
| 1965 | 227.24 million | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 230.29 million | +1.3% |
| 1967 | 232.71 million | +1.0% |
| 1968 | 234.49 million | +0.8% |
| 1969 | 236.03 million | +0.7% |
| 1970 | 237.66 million | +0.7% |
| 1971 | 240.81 million | +1.3% |
| 1972 | 243.54 million | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 244.97 million | +0.6% |
| 1974 | 246.28 million | +0.5% |
| 1975 | 247.23 million | +0.4% |
| 1976 | 247.65 million | +0.2% |
| 1977 | 251.33 million | +1.5% |
| 1978 | 253.13 million | +0.7% |
| 1979 | 254.09 million | +0.4% |
| 1980 | 252.34 million | -0.7% |
| 1981 | 251.73 million | -0.2% |
| 1982 | 251.46 million | -0.1% |
| 1983 | 254.11 million | +1.1% |
| 1984 | 255.19 million | +0.4% |
| 1985 | 257.30 million | +0.8% |
| 1986 | 260.03 million | +1.1% |
| 1987 | 262.82 million | +1.1% |
| 1988 | 266.32 million | +1.3% |
| 1989 | 268.69 million | +0.9% |
| 1990 | 270.92 million | +0.8% |
| 1991 | 272.75 million | +0.7% |
| 1992 | 274.38 million | +0.6% |
| 1993 | 275.83 million | +0.5% |
| 1994 | 277.17 million | +0.5% |
| 1995 | 278.45 million | +0.5% |
| 1996 | 279.70 million | +0.4% |
| 1997 | 280.76 million | +0.4% |
| 1998 | 281.64 million | +0.3% |
| 1999 | 282.59 million | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 283.50 million | +0.3% |
| 2001 | 284.44 million | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 285.29 million | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 286.12 million | +0.3% |
| 2004 | 286.97 million | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 287.58 million | +0.2% |
| 2006 | 288.23 million | +0.2% |
| 2007 | 288.87 million | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 289.47 million | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 290.05 million | +0.2% |
| 2010 | 290.64 million | +0.2% |
| 2011 | 291.26 million | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 291.77 million | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 292.24 million | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 292.61 million | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 292.96 million | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 293.58 million | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 294.32 million | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 295.06 million | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 295.85 million | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 296.28 million | +0.1% |
| 2021 | 296.59 million | +0.1% |
| 2022 | 296.85 million | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 297.08 million | +0.1% |
| 2024 | 297.29 million | +0.1% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 297.29 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 16% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 297.29 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.56 billion, 19% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +122.1% | 272,968 | 606,319 |
| 1852 | +57.9% | 606,319 | 957,293 |
| 1853 | +37.3% | 957,293 | 1.31 million |
| 1854 | +28.0% | 1.31 million | 1.68 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 1.91 million | 272,968 | 3.65 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 6.20 million | 4.10 million | 8.33 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 11.72 million | 8.88 million | 14.66 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 17.90 million | 15.28 million | 20.48 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 24.28 million | 21.14 million | 27.49 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 33.54 million | 28.42 million | 38.98 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 46.91 million | 40.33 million | 53.64 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 65.70 million | 55.51 million | 76.46 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 81.73 million | 78.08 million | 84.23 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 114.60 million | 87.45 million | 146.09 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 178.66 million | 152.33 million | 206.00 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 225.02 million | 210.75 million | 236.03 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 246.67 million | 237.66 million | 254.09 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 258.00 million | 251.46 million | 268.69 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 277.42 million | 270.92 million | 282.59 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 287.05 million | 283.50 million | 290.05 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 293.03 million | 290.64 million | 295.85 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 296.82 million | 296.28 million | 297.29 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 122 South Korea 362.63 million compare
- 123 Namibia 359.14 million compare
- 124 Guinea-Bissau 314.21 million compare
- 126 Botswana 286.35 million compare
- 127 Switzerland 284.29 million compare
- 128 Eritrea 258.77 million compare
More climate change data for Eswatini
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 10.39 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,459 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 469.92 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 988.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 35.32 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 77.58 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 66.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2521 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Eswatini was 297.29 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 297.29 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 272,968 in 1850.
- How does Eswatini rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Eswatini ranks 125th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).