Cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Cumulative co2 land use was 371.81 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
371.81 million
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
120th
of 197 countries
All-time high
375.38 million
in 2005
All-time low
1.51 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 371.81 million for cumulative co2 land use in 2024.
That represents a change of down 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 375.38 million in 2005 and was at its lowest, 1.51 million, in 1850.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 120th of 197 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 1.51 million | — |
| 1851 | 3.03 million | +101.0% |
| 1852 | 4.56 million | +50.6% |
| 1853 | 6.10 million | +33.8% |
| 1854 | 7.65 million | +25.4% |
| 1855 | 9.21 million | +20.4% |
| 1856 | 10.78 million | +17.0% |
| 1857 | 12.35 million | +14.6% |
| 1858 | 13.93 million | +12.8% |
| 1859 | 15.52 million | +11.4% |
| 1860 | 17.11 million | +10.3% |
| 1861 | 18.72 million | +9.4% |
| 1862 | 20.33 million | +8.6% |
| 1863 | 21.95 million | +8.0% |
| 1864 | 23.59 million | +7.4% |
| 1865 | 25.23 million | +6.9% |
| 1866 | 26.87 million | +6.5% |
| 1867 | 28.52 million | +6.1% |
| 1868 | 30.18 million | +5.8% |
| 1869 | 31.84 million | +5.5% |
| 1870 | 33.53 million | +5.3% |
| 1871 | 35.23 million | +5.1% |
| 1872 | 36.94 million | +4.9% |
| 1873 | 38.65 million | +4.7% |
| 1874 | 40.38 million | +4.5% |
| 1875 | 42.11 million | +4.3% |
| 1876 | 43.86 million | +4.1% |
| 1877 | 45.60 million | +4.0% |
| 1878 | 47.36 million | +3.8% |
| 1879 | 49.12 million | +3.7% |
| 1880 | 50.90 million | +3.6% |
| 1881 | 52.78 million | +3.7% |
| 1882 | 54.64 million | +3.5% |
| 1883 | 56.50 million | +3.4% |
| 1884 | 58.36 million | +3.3% |
| 1885 | 60.22 million | +3.2% |
| 1886 | 62.08 million | +3.1% |
| 1887 | 63.95 million | +3.0% |
| 1888 | 65.81 million | +2.9% |
| 1889 | 67.68 million | +2.8% |
| 1890 | 69.57 million | +2.8% |
| 1891 | 71.48 million | +2.7% |
| 1892 | 73.39 million | +2.7% |
| 1893 | 75.32 million | +2.6% |
| 1894 | 77.25 million | +2.6% |
| 1895 | 79.19 million | +2.5% |
| 1896 | 81.14 million | +2.5% |
| 1897 | 83.10 million | +2.4% |
| 1898 | 85.06 million | +2.4% |
| 1899 | 87.02 million | +2.3% |
| 1900 | 89.01 million | +2.3% |
| 1901 | 91.00 million | +2.2% |
| 1902 | 93.01 million | +2.2% |
| 1903 | 95.02 million | +2.2% |
| 1904 | 97.05 million | +2.1% |
| 1905 | 99.08 million | +2.1% |
| 1906 | 101.13 million | +2.1% |
| 1907 | 103.18 million | +2.0% |
| 1908 | 105.23 million | +2.0% |
| 1909 | 107.29 million | +2.0% |
| 1910 | 109.39 million | +2.0% |
| 1911 | 111.51 million | +1.9% |
| 1912 | 113.65 million | +1.9% |
| 1913 | 115.80 million | +1.9% |
| 1914 | 117.95 million | +1.9% |
| 1915 | 120.11 million | +1.8% |
| 1916 | 122.28 million | +1.8% |
| 1917 | 124.46 million | +1.8% |
| 1918 | 126.64 million | +1.8% |
| 1919 | 128.83 million | +1.7% |
| 1920 | 131.02 million | +1.7% |
| 1921 | 133.22 million | +1.7% |
| 1922 | 135.41 million | +1.6% |
| 1923 | 137.62 million | +1.6% |
| 1924 | 139.83 million | +1.6% |
| 1925 | 142.04 million | +1.6% |
| 1926 | 144.26 million | +1.6% |
| 1927 | 146.48 million | +1.5% |
| 1928 | 148.71 million | +1.5% |
| 1929 | 150.94 million | +1.5% |
| 1930 | 153.13 million | +1.5% |
| 1931 | 155.30 million | +1.4% |
| 1932 | 157.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1933 | 159.57 million | +1.4% |
| 1934 | 161.68 million | +1.3% |
| 1935 | 163.77 million | +1.3% |
| 1936 | 165.85 million | +1.3% |
| 1937 | 167.91 million | +1.2% |
| 1938 | 169.96 million | +1.2% |
| 1939 | 171.99 million | +1.2% |
| 1940 | 174.18 million | +1.3% |
| 1941 | 176.45 million | +1.3% |
| 1942 | 178.79 million | +1.3% |
| 1943 | 181.20 million | +1.3% |
| 1944 | 183.66 million | +1.4% |
| 1945 | 186.17 million | +1.4% |
| 1946 | 188.72 million | +1.4% |
| 1947 | 191.31 million | +1.4% |
| 1948 | 193.93 million | +1.4% |
| 1949 | 196.58 million | +1.4% |
| 1950 | 200.27 million | +1.9% |
| 1951 | 204.73 million | +2.2% |
| 1952 | 209.92 million | +2.5% |
| 1953 | 215.74 million | +2.8% |
| 1954 | 222.27 million | +3.0% |
| 1955 | 229.71 million | +3.3% |
| 1956 | 237.94 million | +3.6% |
| 1957 | 246.91 million | +3.8% |
| 1958 | 256.75 million | +4.0% |
| 1959 | 267.54 million | +4.2% |
| 1960 | 275.81 million | +3.1% |
| 1961 | 283.12 million | +2.7% |
| 1962 | 289.15 million | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 294.36 million | +1.8% |
| 1964 | 299.19 million | +1.6% |
| 1965 | 303.18 million | +1.3% |
| 1966 | 306.88 million | +1.2% |
| 1967 | 310.18 million | +1.1% |
| 1968 | 313.45 million | +1.1% |
| 1969 | 316.31 million | +0.9% |
| 1970 | 318.99 million | +0.8% |
| 1971 | 321.51 million | +0.8% |
| 1972 | 324.00 million | +0.8% |
| 1973 | 326.54 million | +0.8% |
| 1974 | 328.56 million | +0.6% |
| 1975 | 330.57 million | +0.6% |
| 1976 | 332.56 million | +0.6% |
| 1977 | 334.22 million | +0.5% |
| 1978 | 335.63 million | +0.4% |
| 1979 | 337.07 million | +0.4% |
| 1980 | 338.39 million | +0.4% |
| 1981 | 339.81 million | +0.4% |
| 1982 | 341.13 million | +0.4% |
| 1983 | 342.27 million | +0.3% |
| 1984 | 343.42 million | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 344.64 million | +0.4% |
| 1986 | 345.71 million | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 346.61 million | +0.3% |
| 1988 | 347.21 million | +0.2% |
| 1989 | 347.74 million | +0.2% |
| 1990 | 348.28 million | +0.2% |
| 1991 | 349.03 million | +0.2% |
| 1992 | 351.62 million | +0.7% |
| 1993 | 354.21 million | +0.7% |
| 1994 | 357.72 million | +1.0% |
| 1995 | 360.83 million | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 363.32 million | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 365.60 million | +0.6% |
| 1998 | 368.30 million | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 369.96 million | +0.5% |
| 2000 | 371.43 million | +0.4% |
| 2001 | 372.64 million | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 373.98 million | +0.4% |
| 2003 | 375.27 million | +0.3% |
| 2004 | 375.33 million | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 375.38 million | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 375.30 million | -0.0% |
| 2007 | 375.17 million | -0.0% |
| 2008 | 374.92 million | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 374.60 million | -0.1% |
| 2010 | 374.19 million | -0.1% |
| 2011 | 373.91 million | -0.1% |
| 2012 | 373.73 million | -0.0% |
| 2013 | 373.59 million | -0.0% |
| 2014 | 373.50 million | -0.0% |
| 2015 | 373.67 million | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 373.69 million | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 373.59 million | -0.0% |
| 2018 | 373.42 million | -0.0% |
| 2019 | 373.21 million | -0.1% |
| 2020 | 373.01 million | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 372.74 million | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 372.45 million | -0.1% |
| 2023 | 372.14 million | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 371.81 million | -0.1% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 371.81 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.89 billion, 20% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 371.81 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 425.87 million, 87% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1851 | +101.0% | 1.51 million | 3.03 million |
| 1852 | +50.6% | 3.03 million | 4.56 million |
| 1853 | +33.8% | 4.56 million | 6.10 million |
| 1854 | +25.4% | 6.10 million | 7.65 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 8.46 million | 1.51 million | 15.52 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 24.43 million | 17.11 million | 31.84 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 41.28 million | 33.53 million | 49.12 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 59.29 million | 50.90 million | 67.68 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 78.25 million | 69.57 million | 87.02 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 98.10 million | 89.01 million | 107.29 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 119.06 million | 109.39 million | 128.83 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 140.95 million | 131.02 million | 150.94 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 162.66 million | 153.13 million | 171.99 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 185.10 million | 174.18 million | 196.58 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 229.18 million | 200.27 million | 267.54 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 299.17 million | 275.81 million | 316.31 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 328.96 million | 318.99 million | 337.07 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 343.69 million | 338.39 million | 347.74 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 358.89 million | 348.28 million | 369.96 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 374.40 million | 371.43 million | 375.38 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 373.65 million | 373.21 million | 374.19 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 372.43 million | 371.81 million | 373.01 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More climate change data for Kyrgyzstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 50.11 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,659 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,143 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,517 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.31 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 125.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 456.99 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 404.1 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 52.89 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.52 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan?
- Cumulative co2 land use in Kyrgyzstan was 371.81 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 375.38 million in 2005.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 land use recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.51 million in 1850.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for cumulative co2 land use?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 120th out of 197 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 land use rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).