Food Processing — Energy Use in Belarus
Belarus: Food Processing — Energy Use was 199.94 TJ in 2009. ▲ Rising
Food Processing — Energy Use in Belarus, 1993–2009
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in TJ.
Analysis
In 2009, food processing — energy use in Belarus stood at 199.94 TJ.
The figure is up 32.2% on the previous year and up 39.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, food processing — energy use in Belarus peaked at 299.69 TJ in 2005 and was at its lowest, 51.34 TJ, in 2001.
Belarus ranks 39th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 124.68 TJ | 102.68 TJ | 154.02 TJ | 7 |
| 2000s | 195.15 TJ | 51.34 TJ | 299.69 TJ | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 36 Georgia 306.88 TJ
- 37 Finland 262.46 TJ compare
- 38 Tajikistan 258 TJ
- 40 Serbia 105.08 TJ
- 41 Bulgaria 84.52 TJ compare
- 42 Montenegro 63.07 TJ
More climate change data for Belarus
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 12,124 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO 2,377 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO 9,748 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 8.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 348.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 4,092 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 4,078 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — FAO TIER 1 14.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (N2O) — FAO TIER 1 15.39 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 0.513 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is food processing — energy use in Belarus?
- Food processing — energy use in Belarus was 199.94 TJ in 2009, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest food processing — energy use recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 299.69 TJ in 2005.
- What is the lowest food processing — energy use recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 51.34 TJ in 2001.
- How does Belarus rank for food processing — energy use?
- Belarus ranks 39th out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is food processing — energy use rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Food Processing — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.